Targets for maintenance of dead wood for biodiversity conservation based on extinction thresholds

Abstract Forestry decreases the amount of dead wood, thereby threatening the persistence of many saproxylic (wood-living) organisms. This article discusses how targets for efforts to maintain and restore dead wood in managed forest landscapes should be defined. Several studies suggest extinction thresholds for saproxylic organisms. However, because the thresholds differ among species, the relationship between species richness and habitat amount at the local scale is probably described by a smoothly increasing curve without any distinct threshold. The most demanding species require amounts of dead wood that are virtually impossible to reach in managed forests. This means that unmanaged protected forests are needed. In managed forests, conservation efforts should focus on the landscape scale and on certain types of dead wood, but it is impossible to come up with any particular amount of dead wood that is desirable at the forest stand level.

[1]  Andrew F. Bennett,et al.  Landscape-level thresholds of habitat cover for woodland-dependent birds , 2005 .

[2]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Native vegetation cover thresholds associated with species responses , 2005 .

[3]  A. Huggett.  The concept and utility of ecological thresholds in biodiversity conservation , 2005 .

[4]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Fecundity determines the extinction threshold in a Canadian assemblage of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) , 2005, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[5]  Therese Johansson,et al.  Effects of management on coarse woody debris volume and composition in boreal forests in northern Sweden , 2005 .

[6]  Per Angelstam,et al.  Dead wood threshold values for the three-toed woodpecker presence in boreal and sub-alpine forest , 2004 .

[7]  T. Ranius,et al.  Modelling the amount of coarse woody debris produced by the new biodiversity-oriented silvicultural practices in Sweden , 2004 .

[8]  J. Siitonen,et al.  Polypore diversity in managed and old-growth boreal Picea abies forests in southern Finland , 2004 .

[9]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Determining the Spatial Scale of Species' Response to Habitat , 2004 .

[10]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Estimating the consequences of habitat fragmentation on extinction risk in dynamic landscapes , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  B. Brown.  Science and management , 1995, Coral Reefs.

[12]  B. Økland,et al.  What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles? A multiscaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[13]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Giant Velvet Worm (Tasmanipatus barretti) in Tasmania, Australia - Effects of Planned Conversion of Native Forests to Plantations , 2004 .

[14]  P. Pechacek.  SPACING BEHAVIOR OF EURASIAN THREE-TOED WOODPECKERS (PICOIDES TRIDACTYLUS) DURING THE BREEDING SEASON IN GERMANY , 2004 .

[15]  H. Akçakaya,et al.  Population viability analyses in conservation planning : an overview , 2004 .

[16]  L. Fahrig.  Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity , 2003 .

[17]  P. Angelstam,et al.  Habitat thresholds for focal species at multiple scales and forest biodiversity conservation - dead wood as an example , 2003 .

[18]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Extinction threshold in metapopulation models , 2003 .

[19]  Simon J. Grove,et al.  Saproxylic Insect Ecology and the Sustainable Management of Forests , 2002 .

[20]  O. Ovaskainen,et al.  Extinction Debt at Extinction Threshold , 2002 .

[21]  Simon J. Grove,et al.  Tree basal area and dead wood as surrogate indicators of saproxylic insect faunal integrity: a case study from the Australian lowland tropics , 2002 .

[22]  T. Ranius.  Influence of stand size and quality of tree hollows on saproxylic beetles in Sweden , 2002 .

[23]  R. Muradian.  Ecological thresholds: a survey , 2001 .

[24]  L. Fahrig.  How much habitat is enough , 2001 .

[25]  S. Larsson,et al.  Science and the Management of Boreal Forest Biodiversity , 2001 .

[26]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Biodiversity and its Assessment in Boreal and Nemoral Forests , 2001 .

[27]  Juha Siitonen,et al.  Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example , 2001 .

[28]  Juha Siitonen,et al.  Species richness of Coleoptera in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland , 2000 .

[29]  A. Carlson.  The effect of habitat loss on a deciduous forest specialist species: the White-backed Woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos) , 2000 .

[30]  Jonas Fridman,et al.  Amount, structure, and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden , 2000 .

[31]  I. Hanski,et al.  Extinction debt and species credit in boreal forests: modelling the consequences of different approaches to biodiversity conservation. , 2000 .

[32]  A. King,et al.  Extinction Thresholds for Species in Fractal Landscapes , 1999 .

[33]  R. Lambeck,et al.  Focal Species: a Multi-species Umbrella for Nature Conservation Focal Species for Nature Conservation Lambeck , 2022 .

[34]  I. Turner.  Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence. , 1996 .

[35]  H. Andrén,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review , 1994 .

[36]  Robert McKelvey,et al.  A Dynamic Analysis of Northern Spotted Owl Viability in a Fragmented Forest Landscape , 1992 .

[37]  Martin C.D. Speight,et al.  Saproxylic Invertebrates and Their Conservation , 1989 .

[38]  R. Lande,et al.  Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial Populations , 1987, The American Naturalist.