A Modified Directional Flame Thermometer: Development, Calibration, and Uncertainty Quantification

The directional flame thermometer (DFT) is a robust device used to measure heat fluxes in harsh environments such as fire scenarios but is large when compared to other standard heat flux measurement devices. To better understand the uncertainties associated with heat flux measurements in these environments, a Bayesian framework is utilized to propagate uncertainties of both known and unknown parameters describing the thermal model of a modified, smaller DFT. Construction of the modified DFT is described along with a derivation of the thermal model used to predict the incident heat flux to its sensing surface. Parameters of the model are calibrated to data collected using a Schmidt–Boelter (SB) gauge with an accuracy of ±3% at incident heat fluxes of 5 kW/m2, 10 kW/m2, and 15 kW/m2. Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations were used to obtain posterior distributions for the free parameters of the thermal model as well as the modeling uncertainty. The parameter calibration process produced values for the free parameters that were similar to those presented in the literature with relative uncertainties at 5 kW/m2, 10 kW/m2, and 15 kW/m2 of 17%, 9%, and 7%, respectively. The derived model produced root-mean-squared errors between the prediction and SB gauge output of 0.37, 0.77, and 1.13 kW/m2 for the 5, 10, and 15 kW/m2 cases, respectively, compared to 0.53, 1.12, and 1.66 kW/m2 for the energy storage method (ESM) described in ASTM E3057.

[1]  Thomas K. Blanchat,et al.  Sandia Heat Flux Gauge Thermal Response and Uncertainty Models , 2000 .

[2]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[3]  J. Berger.  The case for objective Bayesian analysis , 2006 .

[4]  James Thomas Nakos,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of steady state incident heat flux measurements in hydrocarbon fuel fires. , 2005 .

[5]  James V. Beck,et al.  Using Directional Flame Thermometers for Measuring Thermal Exposure , 2010 .

[6]  Lixing Han,et al.  Implementing the Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm with adaptive parameters , 2010, Computational Optimization and Applications.

[7]  Elizabeth J. Weckman,et al.  Steady-state heat flux measurements in radiative and mixed radiative–convective environments , 2009 .

[8]  Frank P. Incropera,et al.  Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer , 1981 .

[9]  S. Geisser,et al.  Posterior Distributions for Multivariate Normal Parameters , 1963 .

[10]  V. F. Nicolette,et al.  UNCERTAINTY IN PROPELLANT FIRE HEAT FLUX--AN EXPERIMENTAL AND MODELING APPROACH. , 2008 .

[11]  R. T. Cox.  Probability, frequency and reasonable expectation , 1990 .

[12]  H. Jeffreys.  An invariant form for the prior probability in estimation problems , 1946, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[13]  E. Iso,et al.  Measurement Uncertainty and Probability: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement , 1995 .

[14]  P. Laplace.  Théorie analytique des probabilités , 1995 .

[15]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[16]  Edwin T. Jaynes.  Prior Probabilities , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[17]  G. D'Agostini.  Probability and Measurement Uncertainty in Physics - a Bayesian Primer , 1995 .

[18]  James O. Berger,et al.  Objective Bayesian Analysis for the Multivariate Normal Model , 2006 .

[19]  A. Gelman,et al.  Weak convergence and optimal scaling of random walk Metropolis algorithms , 1997 .

[20]  Thomas J. Ohlemiller,et al.  Estimates of the Uncertainty of Radiative Heat Flux Caclulated From Total Heat Flux Measurements | NIST , 2001 .