The role of suppression in resolving interference: evidence for an age-related deficit.

Difficulty with memory retrieval is a salient feature of cognitive aging and may be related to a reduction in the ability to suppress items that compete for retrieval. To test this hypothesis directly, we presented a series of words for shallow coding that included pairs of orthographically similar words (e.g., ALLERGY and ANALOGY). After a delay, participants solved word fragments (e.g., A _ L _ _ GY) that resembled both words in a pair but could only be completed by one. We measured the consequence of having successfully resolved competition by having participants read a list of words including the rejected competitors as quickly as possible. Response time was compared with control conditions that did not require resolving competition. Older adults showed no evidence of suppression; instead they showed priming for the competitors, in sharp contrast to strong suppression effects previously observed in younger adults. Whereas previous studies have provided clear evidence for suppression deficits by examining the ability to produce targets in high interference situations, here we provide direct evidence for a suppression deficit by examining the accessibility of rejected competitors.

[1]  Simon Hanslmayr,et al.  Binding and inhibition in episodic memory—Cognitive, emotional, and neural processes , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[2]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  In Opposition to Inhibition , 2003 .

[3]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Hyper-Binding , 2010, Psychological science.

[4]  R. Zacks,et al.  Is retrieval-induced forgetting an inhibitory process? , 2001, The American journal of psychology.

[5]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  Memory Changes in Normal Aging , 1994 .

[6]  L Hasher,et al.  Age and the availability of inferences. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[7]  G. Radvansky,et al.  The fan effect: a tale of two theories. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  B. Underwood,et al.  Critical issues in interference theory , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[9]  B. Underwood Interference and forgetting. , 1957, Psychological review.

[10]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .

[11]  John Jonides,et al.  Common and distinct neural correlates of perceptual and memorial selection , 2009, NeuroImage.

[12]  U. Lindenberger,et al.  Cognitive and sensory declines in old age: gauging the evidence for a common cause. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[13]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  The role of item strength in retrieval-induced forgetting. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  D. Balota,et al.  Conscious and unconscious lexical retrieval blocking in younger and older adults. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[15]  L Hasher,et al.  Implicit Memory is Vulnerable to Proactive Interference , 2001, Psychological science.

[16]  D. Balota,et al.  Failures to find suppression of episodic memories in the think/no-think paradigm , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[17]  B. McElree,et al.  Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011 .

[18]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[19]  L. Hasher,et al.  Age differences in implicit interference. , 2006, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[20]  Benjamin C. Storm,et al.  When intended remembering leads to unintended forgetting , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[22]  Retrieval-induced forgetting without competition: Testing the retrieval specificity assumption of the inhibition theory , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[23]  L. Hasher,et al.  Cognitive ageing: A positive perspective , 2011 .

[24]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[25]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: memory retrieval as a model case. , 1995, Psychological review.

[26]  Hauke R. Heekeren,et al.  Age-Related Decline in Brain Resources Modulates Genetic Effects on Cognitive Functioning , 2008, Front. Neurosci..

[27]  Ehren L. Newman,et al.  A neural network model of retrieval-induced forgetting. , 2007, Psychological review.

[28]  Cheryl L Grady,et al.  Changes in memory processing with age , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[29]  D. Balota,et al.  Memory changes in healthy young and older adults , 2000 .

[30]  C. Lustig,et al.  Implicit memory is not immune to interference. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Cognitive aging and increased distractibility: costs and potential benefits. , 2008, Progress in brain research.

[32]  R. Knight,et al.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  G. Radvansky,et al.  Memory retrieval and suppression: the inhibition of situation models. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  H. P. Bahrick Two-phase model for prompted recall. , 1970 .

[35]  Brice A. Kuhl,et al.  Intentional suppression of unwanted memories grows more difficult as we age. , 2011, Psychology and aging.

[36]  J R Anderson,et al.  Interference in memory for multiple contexts , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[37]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Age and inhibition: the retrieval of situation models. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[38]  Benjamin C. Storm,et al.  A progress report on the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting , 2012, Memory & Cognition.

[39]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Implicit Proactive Interference, Age, and Automatic Versus Controlled Retrieval Strategies , 2008, Psychological science.

[40]  M. Bajo,et al.  Memory inhibition, aging, and the executive deficit hypothesis. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  J. Nigg On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Age differences in visuospatial working memory. , 2008, Psychology and aging.

[43]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Age-related Deficits in Associative Memory: the Influence of Impaired Strategic Retrieval Binding Hypothesis and Retrieval Failure , 2022 .

[44]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  I. Hulicka Age differences in retention as a function of interference. , 1967, Journal of gerontology.

[46]  B. Underwood,et al.  Extraexperimental sources of interference in forgeting. , 1960, Psychological review.

[47]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Aging and Long-Term Memory: Deficits Are Not Inevitable. , 2006 .

[48]  Eddy J Davelaar,et al.  An interference account of cue-independent forgetting in the no-think paradigm , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Anthony J Bishara,et al.  Aging, subjective experience, and cognitive control: dramatic false remembering by older adults. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  F. Craik,et al.  Age differences in recall and recognition , 1987 .

[51]  J. V. Van Dyke Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[52]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  The role of interference in memory span , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[53]  C. Lustig,et al.  Inhibitory Mechanisms and the Control of Attention , 2007 .

[54]  D. Schacter,et al.  Two types of recollection-based monitoring in younger and older adults: Recall-to-reject and the distinctiveness heuristic , 2006, Memory.

[55]  M. Kahana,et al.  Is memory search governed by universal principles or idiosyncratic strategies? , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[56]  K. Campbell,et al.  Direct Evidence for the Role of Inhibition in Resolving Interference in Memory , 2010, Psychological science.

[57]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : General Neural Mechanisms of Interference Control Underlie the Relationship Between Fluid Intelligence and Working Memory Span , 2011 .

[58]  M Moscovitch,et al.  Paired-associate learning in institutionalized and noninstitutionalized old people: an analysis of interference and context effects. , 1983, Journal of gerontology.

[59]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  Age Differences in Depth of Retrieval: Memory for Foils. , 2005 .

[60]  Deborah E. Hannula,et al.  The hippocampus reevaluated in unconscious learning and memory: at a tipping point? , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[61]  L. Light Memory and aging: four hypotheses in search of data. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[62]  U. Mayr Inhibition of action rules , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[63]  David M Erceg-Hurn,et al.  Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. , 2008, The American psychologist.

[64]  M. Naveh-Benjamin Adult age differences in memory performance: tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[65]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Effects of frontal lobe damage on interference effects in working memory , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.