Bayesian inference applied to the electromagnetic inverse problem

We present a new approach to the electromagnetic inverse problem that explicitly addresses the ambiguity associated with its ill‐posed character. Rather than calculating a single “best” solution according to some criterion, our approach produces a large number of likely solutions that both fit the data and any prior information that is used. Whereas the range of the different likely results is representative of the ambiguity in the inverse problem even with prior information present, features that are common across a large number of the different solutions can be identified and are associated with a high degree of probability. This approach is implemented and quantified within the formalism of Bayesian inference, which combines prior information with that of measurement in a common framework using a single measure. To demonstrate this approach, a general neural activation model is constructed that includes a variable number of extended regions of activation and can incorporate a great deal of prior information on neural current such as information on location, orientation, strength, and spatial smoothness. Taken together, this activation model and the Bayesian inferential approach yield estimates of the probability distributions for the number, location, and extent of active regions. Both simulated MEG data and data from a visual evoked response experiment are used to demonstrate the capabilities of this approach. Hum. Brain Mapping 7:195–212, 1999 Published 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. This article is a US government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.

[1]  Aine Cj,et al.  A conceptual overview and critique of functional neuroimaging techniques in humans: I. MRI/FMRI and PET. , 1995 .

[2]  C C Wood,et al.  Retinotopic organization of human visual cortex: departures from the classical model. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Magnetic source images determined by a lead-field analysis: the unique minimum-norm least-squares estimation , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  U. Mitzdorf Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. , 1985, Physiological reviews.

[5]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[6]  Sylvain Baillet,et al.  A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  MEG-based imaging of focal neuronal current sources , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[8]  R. Leahy,et al.  Multiple Dipole Modeling and Localization from , 1992 .

[9]  C. Aine A conceptual overview and critique of functional neuroimaging techniques in humans: I. MRI/FMRI and PET. , 1995, Critical reviews in neurobiology.

[10]  John S. George,et al.  MRIVIEW: An interactive computational tool for investigation of brain structure and function , 1993, Proceedings Visualization '93.

[11]  L. Parkkonen,et al.  122-channel squid instrument for investigating the magnetic signals from the human brain , 1993 .

[12]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[13]  C. B. G. Campbell,et al.  The Central Nervous System , 1975 .

[14]  B. Efron Why Isn't Everyone a Bayesian? , 1986 .

[15]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Evaluation of Methods for Three-Dimensional Localization of Electrical Sources in the Human Brain , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  J. Horton,et al.  The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex. A revision of the classic Holmes map. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  M. Scherg,et al.  Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  A. Dale,et al.  Improved Localizadon of Cortical Activity by Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction: A Linear Approach , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  P. Brodal The Central Nervous System , 1992 .

[20]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[21]  J. Sarvas Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[23]  C C Wood,et al.  Mapping function in the human brain with magnetoencephalography, anatomical magnetic resonance imaging, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[24]  I F Gorodnitsky,et al.  Neuromagnetic source imaging with FOCUSS: a recursive weighted minimum norm algorithm. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  H. Helmholtz Ueber einige Gesetze der Vertheilung elektrischer Ströme in körperlichen Leitern mit Anwendung auf die thierisch‐elektrischen Versuche , 1853 .