Development of dynamic centrifuge models of underground structures near tall buildings

Abstract A series of six centrifuge experiments was designed and conducted to assess the seismic influence of a mid to highrise building on adjacent shallow underground structures. The buildings modeled in this study (12 and 42 stories) were the tallest structures tested in centrifuge to date. In designing these experiments, it was important to represent the modal frequencies, base shear, base moment, and yield characteristics of realistic mid and highrise structures, in order to transmit realistic seismic demands onto the underground structures. For the midrise structure, it was possible to simulate the height, mass, and three primary modes of response with a simplified, scaled model in centrifuge. For the highrise structure, additional simplifications were necessary due to a limited overhead space. A scaled, single-degree-of-freedom structure could capture the fundamental frequency, mass, and therefore base shear of a representative 42-story highrise building, while other properties were sacrificed. The six experiments with varied payloads required similar base motions to experimentally evaluate the seismic impact of buildings on underground structures. The heavy structures applied an unprecedented demand on the shaking table under increased gravity, which was expected to adversely affect the repeatability of motions. Even though the achieved base motions were significantly de-amplified compared to those desired, their coefficient of variation among six experiments was less than 0.2 in the frequency range of interest (0.2–5 Hz), indicating acceptable repeatability. The buildings were instrumented during the centrifuge tests to measure their base shear and roof drifts. The results were consistent with pushover analyses and design requirements, indicating realistic overall stiffness, yielding characteristics, and shear forces transmitted to the foundation. The overall response of the system indicates that, with reasonable approximations, the seismic forces transferred from tall buildings to the foundation soil and an adjacent underground structure can be successfully modeled and evaluated in centrifuge.

[1]  Henry Benjamin Mason Seismic Performance Assessment in Dense Urban Environments , 2011 .

[2]  Ross W. Boulanger,et al.  Mitigation of Earthquake Liquefaction Hazards: A Review of Physical Modelling Studies , 1999 .

[3]  Jonathan D. Bray,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic foundation and frame structure response observed in geotechnical centrifuge experiments , 2013 .

[4]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Seismic Design Considerations for Underground Box Structures , 2010 .

[5]  A. Elgamal,et al.  Computational modeling of cyclic mobility and post-liquefaction site response , 2002 .

[6]  H. Seed Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses , 1970 .

[7]  Alain Pecker,et al.  Earthquake Resistant Design Of Foundations:New Construction , 2000 .

[8]  Geoffrey R. Martin,et al.  Earthquake Resistant Design Of Foundations-Retrofit Of Existing Foundations , 2000 .

[9]  Bill Thornton,et al.  Connection Design in the 2005 AISC Specification and the 13th Edition Manual of Steel Construction , 2006 .

[10]  V. Drnevich,et al.  SHEAR MODULUS AND DAMPING IN SOILS: DESIGN EQUATIONS AND CURVES , 1972 .

[11]  Ronald F. Scott,et al.  Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems : proceedings of the International Conference on the Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems, Davis, California, USA, 17-20 October 1993 , 1993 .

[12]  Mehmet Baris Darendeli,et al.  Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves , 2001 .

[13]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Evaluation of 1-D seismic site response modeling of sand using centrifuge experiments , 2015 .

[14]  Birger Schmidt,et al.  SEISMIC DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES , 2001 .

[15]  Rv Whitman,et al.  Effect of boundary conditions upon centrifuge experiments using ground motion simulation , 1986 .

[16]  Bolton,et al.  Validation by centrifuge testing of numerical simulations for soil-foundation-structure systems , 2004 .

[17]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Dynamic Calibration of Tactile Sensors for Measurement of Soil Pressures in Centrifuge , 2015 .

[18]  V. Drnevich,et al.  Shear Modulus and Damping in Soils: Measurement and Parameter Effects (Terzaghi Leture) , 1972 .

[19]  Jonathan D. Bray,et al.  Seismic soil–foundation–structure interaction observed in geotechnical centrifuge experiments , 2013 .

[20]  Jonathan D. Bray,et al.  Seismic System Identification Using Centrifuge-based Soil-Structure Interaction Test Data , 2013 .

[21]  Christina Louise Jones Interpretation of centrifuge test results of the seismic response of temporary braced excavations near tall buildings , 2015 .

[22]  Jonathan D. Bray,et al.  Mechanisms of Seismically Induced Settlement of Buildings with Shallow Foundations on Liquefiable Soil , 2010 .