Children's use of addition to solve two-digit subtraction problems.

Subtraction problems of the type M - S = ? can be solved with various mental calculation strategies. We investigated fourth- to sixth-graders' use of the subtraction by addition strategy, first by fitting regression models to the reaction times of 32 two-digit subtractions. These models represented three different strategy use patterns: the use of direct subtraction, subtraction by addition, and switching between the two strategies based on the magnitude of the subtrahend. Additionally, we compared performance on problems presented in two presentation formats, i.e., a subtraction format (81 - 37 = .) and an addition format (37 + . = 81). Both methods converged to the conclusion that children of all three grades switched between direct subtraction and subtraction by addition based on the combination of two features of the subtrahend: If the subtrahend was smaller than the difference, direct subtraction was the dominant strategy; if the subtrahend was larger than the difference, subtraction by addition was mainly used. However, this performance pattern was only observed when the numerical distance between subtrahend and difference was large. These findings indicate that theoretical models of children's strategy choices in subtraction should include the nature of the subtrahend as an important factor in strategy selection.

[1]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Solving subtractions adaptively by means of indirect addition: influence of task, subject, and instructional factors , 2009 .

[2]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Whole number concepts and operations , 2007 .

[3]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Flexibility in Problem Solving: The Case of Equation Solving. , 2008 .

[4]  A. W. Blöte,et al.  Mental computation and conceptual understanding , 2000 .

[5]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction , 2007, Nature.

[6]  R. Siegler Implications of Cognitive Science Research for Mathematics Education , 2003 .

[7]  Koeno Gravemeijer,et al.  The role of contexts and models in the development of mathematical strategies and procedures , 1997 .

[8]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Solving Subtraction Problems by Means of Indirect Addition , 2009 .

[9]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Adults' use of subtraction by addition. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[10]  Mary S. Riley,et al.  Development of Children's Problem-Solving Ability in Arithmetic. , 1984 .

[11]  Alexander Robitzsch,et al.  Special education students’ use of indirect addition in solving subtraction problems up to 100—A proof of the didactical potential of an ignored procedure , 2012 .

[12]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Children’s use of subtraction by addition on large single-digit subtractions , 2012 .

[13]  E. Corte,et al.  The Effect of Semantic Structure on First Graders' Strategies for Solving Addition and Subtraction Word Problems. , 1987 .

[14]  Meindert Beishuizen,et al.  Mental Strategies and Materials or Models for Addition and Subtraction Up to 100 in Dutch Second Grades. , 1993 .

[15]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Using addition to solve large subtractions in the number domain up to 20. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[16]  Patrick Lemaire,et al.  Strategy switch costs in arithmetic problem solving , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[17]  L. Verschaffel,et al.  Use of indirect addition in adults' mental subtraction in the number domain up to 1,000. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[18]  Guy J. Groen,et al.  Subtraction and the solution of open sentence problems , 1973 .

[19]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Frequency, efficiency and flexibility of indirect addition in two learning environments , 2010 .

[20]  A. Dowker Use of derived fact strategies by children with mathematical difficulties , 2009 .

[21]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Acquisition and use of shortcut strategies by traditionally schooled children , 2009 .

[22]  Pierre Barrouillet,et al.  Strategies in subtraction problem solving in children. , 2008, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[23]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  It pays to compare: an experimental study on computational estimation. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[24]  Jane Hurry,et al.  Basic calculation proficiency and mathematics achievement in elementary school children. , 2011 .

[25]  Susan B. Empson,et al.  A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children's multidigit addition and subtraction , 1998 .

[26]  Flexibility in strategy use: Adaptation of numerosity judgement strategies to task characteristics , 2003 .

[27]  R. Lesh,et al.  Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes , 1983 .

[28]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Do numerical magnitude comparison skills predict individual differences in mathematical achievement , 2009 .

[29]  L. Verschaffel,et al.  Conceptualizing, investigating, and enhancing adaptive expertise in elementary mathematics education , 2009 .

[30]  Christoph Selter,et al.  Addition and Subtraction of Three-digit Numbers: German Elementary Children's Success, Methods and Strategies , 2001 .

[31]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Strengths and Weaknesses of the Choice/No-Choice Method in Research on Strategy Use , 2009 .

[32]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Efficiency and flexibility of indirect addition in the domain of multi-digit subtraction , 2009 .

[33]  Jeremy Kilpatrick,et al.  Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics , 2013 .

[34]  M. Ashcraft,et al.  Telling stories: the perils and promise of using verbal reports to study math strategies. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Meindert Beishuizen,et al.  MENTAL ARITHMETIC AND STRATEGY USE WITH INDIRECT NUMBER PROBLEMS UP TO ONE HUNDRED , 1997 .

[36]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[37]  D. McDowell Foreword , 1999 .

[38]  Jo-Anne LeFevre,et al.  Selection of procedures in mental subtraction. , 2006, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[39]  Ann Dowker,et al.  The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise , 2003 .

[40]  P. Cobb,et al.  Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in Mathematics. , 1996 .

[41]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The validity of verbal protocols , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[42]  Instruction,et al.  Learning and Instruction : European Research in an International Context / , 1991 .

[43]  Roberto Araya,et al.  A computational model of conscious and unconscious strategy discovery. , 2005, Advances in child development and behavior.

[44]  Karen C. Fuson,et al.  Research on whole number addition and subtraction. , 1992 .

[45]  Guy J. Groen,et al.  An Experimental Test of Five Process Models for Subtraction. , 1975 .

[46]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Do nonsemantic factors also influence the solution process of addition and subtraction word problems , 1990 .

[47]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Subtraction by addition , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[48]  R. Brissiaud,et al.  Teaching and development: Solving “missing addend” problems using subtraction , 1994 .

[49]  Patrick Lemaire,et al.  Children's strategies in computational estimation. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[50]  Katherine M. Robinson,et al.  The validity of verbal reports in children's subtraction , 2001 .