The Perceived Potential of Business Social Networking Sites

Business social networking is a facilitator of several business activities, such as market studies, communication with clients, and identification of business partners. This paper traduces the results of a study undertaken with the purpose of getting to know how the potential of networking is perceived in the promotion of business by participants of the LinkedIn network, and presents two main contributions: 1 to disseminate within the business community which is the relevance given to social networking; and 2 which are the social networks best suitable to the promotion of business, to support the definition of strategies and approaches accordingly. The results confirm that LinkedIn is the most suitable network to answer the needs of those that look for professional contacts and for the promotion of business, while innovation is the most recognized factor in the promotion of business through social networking. This study contributes to a better understanding of the potential of different business social networking sites, to support organizations and professionals to align their strategies with the perceived potential of each network.

[1]  M. Quaddus,et al.  Future of e-business, success factors and e-business opportunities , 2009 .

[2]  Hugo Liu,et al.  Social Network Profiles as Taste Performances , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  B. Baltes,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[4]  Lisa Harris,et al.  Social networks: the future of marketing for small business , 2009 .

[5]  Hans Weigand,et al.  B2B Negotiation Support: The Need for a Communication Perspective , 2003 .

[6]  Srikanth Paruchuri,et al.  Intraorganizational Networks, Interorganizational Networks, and the Impact of Central Inventors: A Longitudinal Study of Pharmaceutical Firms , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[7]  N. Lee,et al.  Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network , 2007 .

[8]  E. Uehara,et al.  Dual Exchange Theory, Social Networks, and Informal Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld , 2009, New Media Soc..

[10]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[11]  Daniel Burrus,et al.  Social networks in the workplace: the risk and opportunity of Business 2.0 , 2010 .

[12]  Amy Y. Chou,et al.  The analysis of online social networking: how technology is changing e-commerce purchasing decision , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Chang. Manag..

[13]  K. Pauwels,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site , 2009 .

[14]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  A Theoretical Perspective of Negotiation Support Systems , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Ken A. Smith,et al.  Interfirm Alliances in the Small Business: The Role of Social Networks , 2002 .

[16]  Harold F. Koenig,et al.  The Effect of Social Networks on Resource Access and Business Start-ups , 2002 .

[17]  Norman A. Johnson,et al.  Power and Concession in Computer-Mediated Negotiations: An Examination of First Offers , 2009, MIS Q..

[18]  David Geerts,et al.  Innovation in Online Communities - Towards Community-Centric Design , 2009, UCMedia.

[19]  Annette N. Shelby,et al.  Organizational, Business, Management, and Corporate Communication: An Analysis of Boundaries and Relationships , 1993 .

[20]  Vladlena Benson,et al.  Online social networks: changing the face of business education and career planning , 2010 .

[21]  Can you see the writing on my wall? $FRQWHQWDQDO\VLVRIWKH)RUWXQH∂V)DFHERRNVRFLDOQHWZRUNLQJVLWHV , 2010 .

[22]  Jill M. Purdy,et al.  THE IMPACT OF COMMUNICATION MEDIA ON NEGOTIATION OUTCOMES , 2000 .

[23]  John G. Breslin,et al.  Online Social and Business Networking Communities , 2004, ECAI Workshop on Application of Semantic Web Technologies to Web Communities.

[24]  Nicholas Athanassiou,et al.  The Impact of the Top Management Team's International Business Experience on the Firm's Internationalization: Social Networks at Work , 2002 .

[25]  Weiguo Fan,et al.  Competitive Actions and Dynamics in the Digital Age: An Empirical Investigation of Social Networking Firms , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Wenpin Tsai Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[27]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[28]  Boudewijn F. van Dongen,et al.  Business process mining: An industrial application , 2007, Inf. Syst..

[29]  A. Greve,et al.  Social Networks and Entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[30]  G. Becker,et al.  A Theory of Social Interactions , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[32]  Harsha Gangadharbatla Facebook Me , 2008 .

[33]  C. Vogt,et al.  THE ANATOMY OF SOCIAL NETWORKS , 2008 .

[34]  James E. Rauch Business and Social Networks in International Trade , 2001 .

[35]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[36]  Mara Olekalns Negotiation as Social Interaction , 2002 .

[37]  Judy Chuan-Chuan Lin,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of trust in online product recommendation: An empirical study in social shopping , 2010, Online Inf. Rev..

[38]  Neil Woodcock,et al.  The evolving data architecture of social customer relationship management , 2011 .

[39]  Judith Donath,et al.  Signals in Social Supernets , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[40]  George A. Miller,et al.  On Human Communication: A Review, a Survey, and a Criticism. , 1957 .

[41]  Neng-Pai Lin,et al.  The effects of network embeddedness on service innovation performance , 2010 .

[42]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measurement and analysis of online social networks , 2007, IMC '07.