A Critique of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lymph Node Map: A Radiation Oncology Perspective

Accurate assessment of nodal involvement is essential in the management of lung cancer. Recently, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Lung Cancer Staging Project published a new lymph node map with the aim of creating an internationally agreed framework that would allow precise and uniform determination of lymph node status by centers around the globe.1 This new map contains important changes to the previously used Mountain-Dresler2 and Naruke3 maps. Conformal radiotherapy planning requires accurate delineation of target volumes. Although there is debate regarding the merits of elective versus involved mediastinal nodal irradiation,4–6 accurate outlining of nodal groups is essential regardless for both prognostication and treatment delivery. Nodal stations are usually outlined as contiguous volumes on computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest, and this generally requires complete and precise descriptions of the anatomical limits to be outlined. Atlases have been created to assist with this task and aim to provide comprehensive guides regarding station boundaries (e.g., Chapet7). We feel that the new IASLC map contains some ambiguities from the viewpoint of radiotherapy planning and outline these here in the hope of promoting discussion that clarifies how radiation oncologists should implement the IASLC map.

[1]  Randall K Ten Haken,et al.  CT-based definition of thoracic lymph node stations: an atlas from the University of Michigan. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  T. Naruke,et al.  Lymph node mapping and curability at various levels of metastasis in resected lung cancer. , 1978, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  Hisao Asamura,et al.  The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: A Proposal for a New International Lymph Node Map in the Forthcoming Seventh Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer , 2009, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[4]  C. Mountain,et al.  Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging. , 1997, Chest.

[5]  D. de Ruysscher,et al.  Variations in target volume definition for postoperative radiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of an international contouring study. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Jinming Yu,et al.  A Randomized Study of Involved-Field Irradiation Versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Combination With Concurrent Chemotherapy for Inoperable Stage III Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer , 2007, American journal of clinical oncology.

[7]  A. Bitencourt,et al.  Conformal radiotherapy for lung cancer: interobservers' variability in the definition of gross tumor volume between radiologists and radiotherapists , 2009, Radiation oncology.

[8]  Hiroichi Ishikawa,et al.  Caudal border of level 2R in the new international lymph node map for lung cancer. , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[9]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Improving radiation conformality in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. , 2010, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[10]  Lawrence B Marks,et al.  Elective nodal irradiation for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: it's called cancer for a reason. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  R. Rami-Porta,et al.  Proposals for changes in the Mountain and Dresler mediastinal and pulmonary lymph node map. , 2007, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[12]  L. Haramati,et al.  Calcification of the ligamentum arteriosum in adults: CT features. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  Nandita Mitra,et al.  Elective nodal irradiation (ENI) vs. involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A comparative analysis of toxicities and clinical outcomes. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.