Life cycle assessment of sisal fibre – Exploring how local practices can influence environmental performance

Sisal fibre can potentially replace glass fibre in natural fibre composites. This study focuses on the environmental performance of sisal fibre production by quantifying the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy use of producing sisal fibre in Tanzania and Brazil using life cycle assessment (LCA), based on region-specific inventory data. The results show that sisal fibre production has much lower GHG emissions (75–95%) and non-renewable energy use (85–95%) compared to glass fibre on a kg-basis, which is in line with published LCAs on natural fibres. Sisal fibre's GHG emissions are strongly influenced by potential methane emissions arising from the wet disposal of sisal leaf residues. Furthermore, because the direct energy and material requirements of sisal fibre production are low, its environmental performance is shown to vary strongly based on local practices such as residue disposal and fertiliser use, and is also sensitive to transportation distances. Several improvement options are explored to understand potential improvements in environmental sustainability. The most attractive option is limiting inadvertent methane emissions occurring at residue disposal sites, for instance by using them for the production of biogas.

[1]  M. John,et al.  Sisal – Cultivation, Processing and Products , 2010 .

[2]  R. Frischknecht,et al.  Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. ecoinvent report No. 3, v2.2 , 2010 .

[3]  S. Joshi,et al.  Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites , 2004 .

[4]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[5]  D. Mmari.  Institutional Innovations and Competitiveness of Smallholders in Tanzania , 2012 .

[6]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Commission Recommendation on the use ofcommon methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performanceof products and organisations , 2013 .

[7]  P. Davies,et al.  Environmental Impact Analysis of the Production of Flax Fibres to be Used as Composite Material Reinforcement , 2011 .

[8]  S.N.C. Dellaert,et al.  Sustainability assessment of the production of sisal fiber in Brazil , 2014 .

[9]  Amelia K. Kivaisi,et al.  The potential of agro-industrial residues for production of biogas and electricity in Tanzania , 1996 .

[10]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products? , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Sara González-García,et al.  Life cycle assessment of raw materials for non-wood pulp mills: Hemp and flax , 2010 .

[12]  K. Pickering,et al.  A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance , 2016 .

[13]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biofibres replacing glass fibres as reinforcement in plastics , 2001 .

[14]  Julia C. Terrapon-Pfaff,et al.  Energy potentials and sustainability—the case of sisal residues in Tanzania , 2012 .

[15]  Libo Yan,et al.  Flax fibre and its composites – A review , 2014 .

[16]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance , 2010 .

[17]  B. Mattiasson,et al.  Effect of particle size on biogas yield from sisal fibre waste , 2006 .

[18]  M. Aldaya,et al.  The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard , 2011 .

[19]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp) , 2005 .

[20]  Giovanni Dotelli,et al.  Life cycle assessment of hemp cultivation and use of hemp-based thermal insulator materials in buildings. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.