Scholarly misconduct and misinformation on the World Wide Web

The World Wide Web is a potentially powerful channel for misinformation. Focusing upon scholarly misconduct as a source of misinformation, examines the potential impact of misinformation on the Web. Floridi has suggested three methods of countering misinformation on the Web: quality certification of information sources; limiting monopolies controlling information resources on the Web; and greater information literacy among Web users. Focus groups composed of LIS faculty and research students in Singapore discussed this topic. Members of the groups felt that there was sufficient motivation for trying to publish the results of scholarly misconduct on the Web. Group members agreed that greater information literacy was a good way to counter misinformation. They did not believe that quality certification would stop misinformation, and that there was a danger that a certifying group would become a censoring body. Focus group members said that greater plurality would decrease misinformation. Some argued that large and prestigious publishers should be welcomed on to the Web rather than opposed.

[1]  Mary Ann Fitzgerald.  Misinformation on the Internet: Applying Evaluation Skills to Online information. , 1997 .

[2]  Stuart Hannabuss,et al.  Information ethics: a contemporary challenge for professionals and the community , 1998 .

[3]  D. Shenk.  Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut , 1997 .

[4]  Peter Hernon,et al.  Research Misconduct: Issues, Implications, and Strategies , 1997 .

[5]  N. Postman,et al.  "Mix a Little Folly with Your Wisdom"--Horace@@@Children and Television.@@@Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. , 1987 .

[6]  Lynda M. Baker,et al.  Healthcare information delivery in public libraries: implications for academic reference librarians , 2000 .

[7]  Angela E. Weaver,et al.  Personal Web Pages as Professional Activities: An Exploratory Study. , 2000 .

[8]  P. Hernon.  Disinformation and misinformation through the internet: Findings of an exploratory study , 1995 .

[9]  D. Morgan.  Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[10]  L. Floridi.  Brave.Net.World: The Internet as a Disinformation Superhighway? , 1996 .

[11]  Sacha Cohen.  Knowledge management's killer app: here's how an intranet can wire employees to information and knowledge without fragmenting a company's culture , 1998 .

[12]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  The connection between the research of a university and counts of links to its web pages: An investigation based upon a classification of the relationships of pages to the research of the host university , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Peter Hernon,et al.  Misconduct in academic research: Its implications for the service quality provided by university libraries , 1995 .