Supervised identification and reconstruction of near-planar geological surfaces from terrestrial laser scanning

Terrestrial laser scanning is an effective method for digitally capturing outcrops, enabling them to be visualized, analyzed, and revisited in an office environment without the limitations of fieldwork (such as time constraints, weather conditions, outcrop accessibility, repeatability, and poor resolution of measurements). It is common practice in geological interpretation of digital outcrops to use visual identification and manual digitization of pointsets or polylines in order to characterise geological features using 3D CAD-like modules. Other recent and less generic approaches have focused on automated extraction of geological features by using segmentation methods, mostly based on geometric parameters derived from the point cloud, but also aided by attributes captured from the outcrop (intensity, RGB). This paper presents a workflow for the supervised and automated identification and reconstruction of near-planar geological surfaces that have a three-dimensional exposure in the outcrop (typically bedding, fractures, or faults enhanced by differential erosion). The original point cloud is used without modifications, and thus no decimation, smoothing, intermediate triangulation, or gridding are required. The workflow is based on planar regressions carried out for each point in the point cloud, enabling subsequent filtering and classification to be based on orientation, quality of fit, and relative locations of points. A coarse grid preprocessing strategy is implemented to speed up the search for neighboring points, permitting analysis of multimillion point clouds. The surfaces identified are organized into classes according to their orientations and regression quality parameters. These can then be used as seeds for building outcrop reconstructions or further analyzed to investigate their characteristics (geometry, morphology, spacing, dimensions, intersections, etc.). The workflow is illustrated here using a synthetic example and a natural example from a limestone outcrop, in which surfaces corresponding to bedding and three fault orientations were reconstructed.

[1]  Evert Slob,et al.  Joint MSc programme in applied geophysics : a new concept in geophysics education , 2007 .

[2]  M. Ashton.  Advances in reservoir geology , 1993 .

[3]  O. Fernández,et al.  Obtaining a best fitting plane through 3D georeferenced data , 2005 .

[4]  A. Gruen,et al.  Least squares 3D surface and curve matching , 2005 .

[5]  T. Rabbani,et al.  SEGMENTATION OF POINT CLOUDS USING SMOOTHNESS CONSTRAINT , 2006 .

[6]  John B. Thurmond,et al.  Building simple multiscale visualizations of outcrop geology using virtual reality modeling language (VRML) , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[7]  S. Viseur.  Automated Methods for Fully Exploring and Interpreting LIDAR Data Points , 2010 .

[8]  F. Legros.  Can Dispersive Pressure Cause Inverse Grading in Grain Flows , 2002 .

[9]  George A. McMechan,et al.  Creating virtual 3-D outcrop , 2000 .

[10]  Louise H. Kellogg,et al.  Extracting and Visualizing Structural Features in Environmental Point Cloud LiDaR Data Sets , 2011, Topological Methods in Data Analysis and Visualization.

[11]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  S. Mitra,et al.  Remote surface mapping using orthophotos and geologic maps draped over digital elevation models: Application to the Sheep Mountain anticline, Wyoming , 2004 .

[13]  G. Sithole,et al.  Recognising structure in laser scanning point clouds , 2004 .

[14]  Charles Kerans,et al.  Three-dimensional geological and synthetic seismic model of Early Permian redeposited basinal carbonate deposits, Victorio Canyon, west Texas , 2007 .

[15]  James P. Evans,et al.  Fault zone architecture and permeability structure , 1996 .

[16]  George Miliaresis,et al.  Segmentation and object-based classification for the extraction of the building class from LIDAR DEMs , 2007, Comput. Geosci..

[17]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[18]  John P. Grotzinger,et al.  Digital characterization of thrombolite-stromatolite reef distribution in a carbonate ramp system (terminal Proterozoic, Nama Group, Namibia) , 2005 .

[19]  Stefano Girardi,et al.  Discrimination between marls and limestones using intensity data from terrestrial laser scanner , 2009 .

[20]  Nicholas K. Sommer,et al.  Sandstone-body dimensions in a lower coastal-plain depositional setting: Lower Williams Fork Formation, Coal Canyon, Piceance Basin, Colorado , 2009 .

[21]  Hierarchical geocellular facies modelling of a turbidite reservoir analogue from the Eocene of the Ainsa basin, NE Spain , 2006 .

[22]  J. A. Howell,et al.  Three-dimensional geological models from outcrop data using digital data collection techniques: an example from the Tanqua Karoo depocentre, South Africa , 2005, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[23]  Hamish Carr,et al.  Topological Methods in Data Analysis and Visualization III, Theory, Algorithms, and Applications , 2011 .

[24]  T. Awwad,et al.  An improved segmentation approach for planar surfaces from unstructured 3D point clouds , 2010 .

[25]  José Luis Lerma,et al.  Unsupervised robust planar segmentation of terrestrial laser scanner point clouds based on fuzzy clustering methods , 2008 .

[26]  Nicolas S. Holliman,et al.  Integration of regional to outcrop digital data: 3D visualisation of multi-scale geological models , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[27]  Pau Arbués,et al.  Modelling facies belt distribution in fan deltas coupling sequence stratigraphy and geostatistics: The Eocene Sant Llorenç del Munt example (Ebro foreland basin, NE Spain) , 2010 .

[28]  Richard R. Jones,et al.  Characterization of fluvial architectural elements using a three-dimensional outcrop data set: Escanilla braided system, South-Central Pyrenees, Spain , 2007 .

[29]  R. Holdsworth,et al.  Digital field data acquisition: towards increased quantification of uncertainty during geological mapping , 2004, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[30]  B. Maathuis,et al.  Stratal patterns and lithofacies of an intact seismic-scale Carboniferous carbonate platform (Asturias, northwestern Spain): a virtual outcrop model , 2004, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[31]  Gianfranco Forlani,et al.  EXTRACTION OF PLANAR PATCHES FROM POINT CLOUDS TO RETRIEVE DIP AND DIP DIRECTION OF ROCK DISCONTINUITIES , 2005 .

[32]  J. Alexander.  A discussion on the use of analogues for reservoir geology , 1993, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[33]  David R. Pyles,et al.  Concepts Learned from a 3D Outcrop of a Sinuous Slope Channel Complex: Beacon Channel Complex, Brushy Canyon Formation, West Texas, U.S.A. , 2010 .

[34]  X. Janson,et al.  Improving fractured carbonate-reservoir characterization with remote sensing of beds, fractures, and vugs , 2009 .

[35]  Immo Trinks,et al.  Mapping and analysing virtual outcrops , 2005 .

[36]  J. Muñoz,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of geological surfaces: An example of growth strata and turbidite systems from the Ainsa basin (Pyrenees, Spain) , 2004 .

[37]  Nigel Woodcock,et al.  Specification of fabric shapes using an eigenvalue method , 1977 .

[38]  Christian Carlsson,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanning for use in Virtual Outcrop Geology , 2010 .

[39]  Jamie K. Pringle,et al.  3D high-resolution digital models of outcrop analogue study sites to constrain reservoir model uncertainty: an example from Alport Castles, Derbyshire, UK , 2004, Petroleum Geoscience.

[40]  David Hodgetts,et al.  Digital analysis brings renaissance for petroleum geology outcrop studies in North Africa , 2007 .

[41]  David Hodgetts,et al.  Integration of digital outcrop models (DOMs) and high resolution sedimentology – workflow and implications for geological modelling: Oukaimeden Sandstone Formation, High Atlas (Morocco) , 2010 .

[42]  Tibor Steiner,et al.  Reconstruction of piecewise planar objects from point clouds , 2004, Comput. Aided Des..

[43]  David Hodgetts,et al.  A new approach for outcrop characterization and geostatistical analysis of a low-sinuosity fluvial-dominated succession using digital outcrop models: Upper Triassic Oukaimeden Sandstone Formation, central High Atlas, Morocco , 2009 .

[44]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[45]  Kenneth J. W. McCaffrey,et al.  Quantitative analysis and visualization of nonplanar fault surfaces using terrestrial laser scanning (LIDAR)—The Arkitsa fault, central Greece, as a case study , 2009 .

[46]  D. Sanderson,et al.  Fault damage zones , 2004 .

[47]  John A. Howell,et al.  From outcrop to reservoir simulation model: Workflow and procedures , 2007 .

[48]  C. Kerans,et al.  Digital Outcrop Models: Applications of Terrestrial Scanning Lidar Technology in Stratigraphic Modeling , 2005 .

[49]  Jamie K. Pringle,et al.  Topics: Virtual geological outcrops – fieldwork and analysis made less exhaustive? , 2004 .

[50]  K. McCaffrey,et al.  Visualization of folding in marble outcrops, Connemara, western Ireland: An application of virtual outcrop technology , 2008 .

[51]  Jamie K. Pringle,et al.  Virtual outcrop models of petroleum reservoir analogues: a review of the current state-of-the-art , 2006 .

[52]  K. S. Dueholm,et al.  Reservoir Analog Studies Using Multimodel Photogrammetry: A New Tool for the Petroleum Industry , 1993 .

[53]  Peter A. Kukla,et al.  Analogue and numerical modelling of sedimentary systems : from understanding to prediction , 2008 .

[54]  John A. Howell,et al.  Overlapping faults and their effect on fluid flow in different reservoir types: A LIDAR-based outcrop modeling and flow simulation study , 2009 .

[55]  S. Buckley,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning in geology: data acquisition, processing and accuracy considerations , 2008, Journal of the Geological Society.

[56]  I. Trinks,et al.  Unlocking the spatial dimension: digital technologies and the future of geoscience fieldwork , 2005, Journal of the Geological Society.

[57]  John F. Ferguson,et al.  Outcrop fracture characterization using terrestrial laser scanners: Deep-water Jackfork sandstone at big rock quarry, Arkansas , 2008 .

[58]  George Vosselman,et al.  Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraints , 2006 .