Making Reconstruction Work: Civil Society and Information after War’s End

This article develops and tests a general framework for explaining variations in the extent of postwar reconstruction. Existing studies point to the importance of economic resources and a coherent state apparatus in promoting effective reconstruction. This study argues that because reconstruction inherently requires coordination between numerous societal actors as well as between state and society, a full explanation for the extent of reconstruction must examine the linkages among those actors, especially civil society. By generating greater amounts of information, a more vibrant civil society leads to (a) better identification of needs, (b) more efficient implementation, and (c) more effective monitoring. Statistical analyses of newly assembled data from 46 Japanese prefectures lend support to the propositions advanced in the article.

[1]  Sheri Berman,et al.  Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic , 1997, World Politics.

[2]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  M. W. Foley,et al.  Social Capital Reconsidered , 2001 .

[4]  Lily L. Tsai Accountability without Democracy: Solidary Groups and Public Goods Provision in Rural China , 2007 .

[5]  Omar G Encarnación Civil Society Reconsidered , 2006 .

[6]  Stewart Patrick,et al.  Good intentions : pledges of aid for postconflict recovery , 2000 .

[7]  Bob Edwards,et al.  Civil Society and Social Capital: A Primer , 2001 .

[8]  Camilla Orjuela Building Peace in Sri Lanka: a Role for Civil Society? , 2003 .

[9]  Donald Rothchild,et al.  Stabilizing the Peace After Civil War: An Investigation of Some Key Variables , 2001, International Organization.

[10]  Mario Diani,et al.  Introduction: Social Movements, Contentious Actions, and Social Networks: ‘From Metaphor to Substance ’? , 2003 .

[11]  James L. Gibson,et al.  Social networks, civil society, and the prospects for consolidating Russia’s democratic transition , 2001 .

[12]  E. Clipp,et al.  Wartime losses and social bonding: influences across 40 years in men's lives. , 1988, Psychiatry.

[13]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Demobilization and Reintegration , 2007 .

[14]  Ruth Benedict,et al.  The Chrysanthemum and the Sword , 1946 .

[15]  V. P. Fortna Does Peacekeeping Keep Peace? International Intervention and the Duration of Peace After Civil War , 2004 .

[16]  T. Skocpol,et al.  The Tocqueville Problem: Civic Engagement in American Democracy , 1997, Social Science History.

[17]  J. Klein Democracy's discontent. , 2009, Time.

[18]  R. Putnam Making Democracy Work , 1993 .

[19]  Lucian W. Pye Communications and political development. , 1965 .

[20]  M. Haddad Civic Responsibility and Patterns of Voluntary Participation Around the World , 2006 .

[21]  Bear F. Braumoeller Hypothesis Testing and Multiplicative Interaction Terms , 2004, International Organization.

[22]  S. Werner,et al.  The Precarious Nature of Peace: Resolving the Issues, Enforcing the Settlement, and Renegotiating the Terms , 1999 .

[23]  S. Theron Post-Conflict Reconstruction , 2011 .

[24]  Nicholas Sambanis,et al.  Making War and Building Peace: United Nations Peace Operations , 2006 .

[25]  Bob Edwards,et al.  Beyond Tocqueville : civil society and the social capital debate in comparative perspective , 2002 .