LMX and Subordinate Performance: The Moderating Effects of Task Characteristics

Role conflict, role ambiguity, and intrinsic task satisfaction are found to moderate the relationship between leader–member exchange (LMX) and subordinate performance. Data from a field study of 146 supervisor–subordinate dyads indicate low conflict, high ambiguity, and high intrinsic satisfaction enhance the link between LMX and performance. Neutralizing effects are found when ambiguity and intrinsic satisfaction are low. High conflict appears to have a constraining effect, whereby the connection between LMX and performance is reduced but not neutralized. Results from the study call attention to the theoretical and practical benefits of examining the LMX/performance link from a contingency perspective, and offer a viable, albeit tentative, explanation for inconsistent findings reported in earlier studies.

[1]  Ronald J. Deluga,et al.  The Role of Subordinate Performance and Ingratiation in Leader-Member Exchanges , 1994 .

[2]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. , 1990 .

[3]  G. Graen,et al.  The effects of leader–member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. , 1982 .

[4]  A. S. Phillips,et al.  Leader-follower exchange quality: the role of personal and interpersonal attributes. , 1994, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[5]  Steve W. J. Kozlowski,et al.  Integration of climate and leadership: Examination of a neglected issue. , 1989 .

[6]  William R. Norris,et al.  Predicting employee turnover from performance, satisfaction, and leader-member exchange , 1996 .

[7]  P. Dorfman,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: test of a construct. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[8]  D. D. Steiner,et al.  The Role of the Initial Interaction in Leader-Member Exchange , 1990 .

[9]  Robert C. Liden,et al.  A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. , 1993 .

[10]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. , 1997 .

[11]  Robert P. Vecchio,et al.  The vertical dyad linkage model of leadership: Problems and prospects , 1984 .

[12]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[13]  R. Cardy,et al.  A Contingency Approach to Appraisal Satisfaction: An Initial Investigation of the Joint Effects of Organizational Variables and Appraisal Characteristics , 1990 .

[14]  William J. Haga,et al.  A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process , 1975 .

[15]  Steven Kerr,et al.  Moderator Variables in Leadership Research , 1986 .

[16]  J. Platt Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. , 1964, Science.

[17]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .

[18]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[19]  Mary Uhl-Bien,et al.  Examining the Link Between Leader Member Exchange and Subordinate Performance: The Role of Task Analyzability and Variety as Moderators , 1992 .

[20]  S. Lirtzman,et al.  Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. , 1970 .

[21]  A. Bedeian,et al.  A path-analytic study of the consequences of role conflict and ambiguity. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[22]  G. Graen,et al.  A Role-Making Model of Leadership in Formal Organizations: A Developmental Approach , 1975 .

[23]  R. Vecchio A further test of leadership effects due to between-group variation and within-group variation. , 1982 .

[24]  Joseph G. Rosse,et al.  Reconsidering the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. , 1983 .

[25]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership as Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors , 1996 .

[26]  H. Klein,et al.  A Field Study of the Influence of Situational Constraints Leader-Member Exchange, and Goal Commitment on Performance , 1998 .