Attentional set interacts with perceptual load in visual search

In the present study, we examined the hypothesis that perceptual load is the primary factor that determines the efficiency of attentional selection. Participants performed a visual search task under conditions of high- and low-load. In line with the perceptual load hypothesis, presenting conditions of highand low-load in separate blocks of trials resulted in processing of to-be-ignored stimuli only in the lowload condition (Experiment 1). However when high- and low-load conditions were randomly mixed in blocks of trials, the participants showed processing of to-be-ignored stimuli in both conditions, suggesting that high perceptual load is not necessarily sufficient to obtain perceptual selectivity (Experiment 2). An analysis of intertrial transition effects showed that on high-load trials, processing of to-be-ignored stimuli occurred only when the previous trial was a low-load trial. The results suggest that low perceptual load can engender broad attentional processing. On the other hand, when a high-load trial was preceded by another high-load trial, little processing of task-irrelevant stimuli was observed. The present results are discussed in terms of the interaction between expectancies and bottom-up factors in the efficiency of attentional selection.

[1]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Decision and stress , 1971 .

[2]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[3]  N. Lavie.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. Theeuwes.  Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[7]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Attention and performance. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  N. Lavie,et al.  On the Efficiency of Visual Selective Attention: Efficient Visual Search Leads to Inefficient Distractor Rejection , 1997 .

[9]  S. Los,et al.  Identifying stimuli of different perceptual categories in pure and mixed blocks of trials: evidence for stimulus-driven switch costs. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[10]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Selective attention and cognitive control: dissociating attentional functions through different types of load , 1998 .

[13]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection , 2000 .

[14]  J. Theeuwes.  Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  B. Gibson,et al.  3 – Inattentional Blindness and Attentional Capture: Evidence for Attention-Based Theories of Visual Salience , 2001 .

[17]  Allison G. McGrath,et al.  Cuing Interacts with Perceptual Load in Visual Search , 2002, Psychological science.

[18]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[19]  D. Broadbent.  Task combination and selective intake of information. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[20]  W. Starbuck,et al.  Level of aspiration. , 1963, Psychological review.

[21]  J. Theeuwes.  Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  J Theeuwes,et al.  Visual selective attention: a theoretical analysis. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[23]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.