Ensemble of ESA/AATSR Aerosol Optical Depth Products Based on the Likelihood Estimate Method With Uncertainties

Within the European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative (CCI) project Aerosol_cci, there are three aerosol optical depth (AOD) data sets of Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) data. These are obtained using the ATSR-2/ATSR dual-view aerosol retrieval algorithm (ADV) by the Finnish Meteorological Institute, the Oxford-Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (RAL) Retrieval of Aerosol and Cloud (ORAC) algorithm by the University of Oxford/RAL, and the Swansea algorithm (SU) by the University of Swansea. The three AOD data sets vary widely. Each has unique characteristics: the spatial coverage of ORAC is greater, but the accuracy of ADV and SU is higher, so none is significantly better than the others, and each has shortcomings that limit the scope of its application. To address this, we propose a method for converging these three products to create a single data set with higher spatial coverage and better accuracy. The fusion algorithm consists of three parts: the first part is to remove the systematic errors; the second part is to calculate the uncertainty and fusion of data sets using the maximum likelihood estimate method; and the third part is to mask outliers with a threshold of 0.12. The ensemble AOD results show that the spatial coverage of fused data set after mask is 148%, 13%, and 181% higher than those of ADV, ORAC, and SU, respectively, and the root-mean-square error, mean absolute error, mean bias error, and relative mean bias are superior to those of the three original data sets. Thus, the accuracy and spatial coverage of the fused AOD data set masked with a threshold of 0.12 are improved compared to the original data set. Finally, we discuss the selection of mask thresholds.

[1]  C. Varotsos,et al.  Impacts of climate warming on atmospheric phase transition mechanisms , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[2]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Evaluation of seven European aerosol optical depth retrieval algorithms for climate analysis , 2015 .

[3]  R. J. Flowerdew,et al.  Retrieval of aerosol optical thickness over land using the ATSR‐2 Dual‐Look Satellite Radiometer , 1996 .

[4]  M. Nirala,et al.  Technical Note: Multi‐sensor data fusion of aerosol optical thickness , 2008 .

[5]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Cloud-Screening and Quality Control Algorithms for the AERONET Database , 2000 .

[6]  Linlu Mei,et al.  Retrieval of aerosol optical properties using MERIS observations: Algorithm and some first results. , 2017, Remote sensing of environment.

[7]  Sundar A. Christopher,et al.  Multisensor Data Product Fusion for Aerosol Research , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Ralph A. Kahn,et al.  A geostatistical data fusion technique for merging remote sensing and ground‐based observations of aerosol optical thickness , 2010 .

[9]  Peter R. J. North,et al.  Retrieval of land surface bidirectional reflectance and aerosol opacity from ATSR-2 multiangle imagery , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  N. Cressie,et al.  Spatial Statistical Data Fusion for Remote Sensing Applications , 2012 .

[11]  Zhengqiang Li,et al.  Remote sensing of atmospheric fine particulate matter (PM2.5) mass concentration near the ground from satellite observation , 2015 .

[12]  T. Eck,et al.  Accuracy assessments of aerosol optical properties retrieved from Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Sun and sky radiance measurements , 2000 .

[13]  B. Holben,et al.  Validation of MODIS aerosol retrieval over ocean , 2002 .

[14]  Yanchen Bo,et al.  Spatiotemporal fusion of multiple‐satellite aerosol optical depth (AOD) products using Bayesian maximum entropy method , 2016 .

[15]  P. Goloub,et al.  Comparison of the aerosol optical properties and size distribution retrieved by sun photometer with in situ measurements at midlatitude , 2016 .

[16]  Jinyuan Xin,et al.  The empirical correlations between PM2.5, PM10 and AOD in the Beijing metropolitan region and the PM2.5, PM10 distributions retrieved by MODIS. , 2016, Environmental pollution.

[17]  Yong Xue,et al.  Technical note: Intercomparison of three AATSR Level 2 (L2) AOD products overChina , 2016 .

[18]  A. Cracknell,et al.  Remote sounding of minor constituents in the stratosphere and heterogeneous reactions of gases at solid interfaces , 1994 .

[19]  Dorit Hammerling,et al.  Geostatistical inverse modeling for super-resolution mapping of continuous spatial processes , 2013 .

[20]  Yuehua Wu,et al.  Penalized Maximal t Test for Detecting Undocumented Mean Change in Climate Data Series , 2007 .

[21]  Y. Kaufman,et al.  Passive remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol and atmospheric , 1997 .

[22]  Yong Xue,et al.  Observation of an agricultural biomass burning in central and east China using merged aerosol optical depth data from multiple satellite missions , 2014 .

[23]  Gerrit de Leeuw,et al.  Retrieval of aerosol optical depth over land using two‐angle view satellite radiometry during TARFOX , 1998 .

[24]  Roy G. Grainger,et al.  Atmospheric Measurement Techniques A sea surface reflectance model for ( A ) ATSR , and application to aerosol retrievals , 2010 .

[25]  Yunmei Li,et al.  An Improved Land Target-Based Atmospheric Correction Method for Lake Taihu , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[26]  Robert C. Levy,et al.  MODIS Collection 6 aerosol products: Comparison between Aqua's e‐Deep Blue, Dark Target, and “merged” data sets, and usage recommendations , 2014 .

[27]  A. Kokhanovsky,et al.  Aerosol remote sensing over land: A comparison of satellite retrievals using different algorithms and instruments , 2007, Atmospheric Research.

[28]  M. Lianou,et al.  Long-term visibility variation in Athens (1931–2013): a proxy forlocal and regional atmospheric aerosol loads , 2016 .

[29]  Yang Liu,et al.  Statistical data fusion of multi-sensor AOD over the Continental United States , 2014 .

[30]  Yong Xue,et al.  A consistent aerosol optical depth (AOD) dataset over mainland China by integration of several AOD products , 2015 .

[31]  Yan Yin,et al.  Long-term (2002–2014) evolution and trend in Collection 5.1 Level-2 aerosol products derived from the MODIS and MISR sensors over the Chinese Yangtze River Delta , 2016 .

[32]  Costas A. Varotsos,et al.  New aspects of global climate-dynamics research and remote sensing , 2011 .

[33]  Sietse O. Los,et al.  A global dataset of atmospheric aerosol optical depth and surface reflectance from AATSR , 2012 .

[34]  J. Luvall,et al.  Optimal temporal scale for the correlation of AOD and ground measurements of PM2.5 in a real-time air quality estimation system , 2009 .

[35]  Lei Yan,et al.  Analysis of Aerosol Radiative Forcing over Beijing under Different Air Quality Conditions Using Ground-Based Sun-Photometers between 2013 and 2015 , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[36]  G. Leeuw,et al.  Aerosol Climate Time Series in ESA Aerosol_cci , 2016 .

[37]  Yong Xue,et al.  China Collection 2.0: The aerosol optical depth dataset from the synergetic retrieval of aerosol properties algorithm , 2014 .

[38]  Richard Siddans,et al.  Oxford-RAL Aerosol and Cloud (ORAC): aerosol retrievals from satellite radiometers , 2009 .

[39]  Zengzhou Hao,et al.  A Unified Algorithm for the Atmospheric Correction of Satellite Remote Sensing Data over Land and Ocean , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[40]  Xiaoyan Ma,et al.  Can MODIS AOD be employed to derive PM2.5 in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei over China? , 2016 .

[41]  Gerrit de Leeuw,et al.  The ADV/ASV AATSR aerosol retrieval algorithm: current status and presentation of a full-mission AOD dataset , 2016, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[42]  Carsten Brockmann,et al.  Synergistic use of MERIS and AATSR as a proxy for estimating Land Surface Temperature from Sentinel-3 data , 2016 .

[43]  B. Holben,et al.  A spatio‐temporal approach for global validation and analysis of MODIS aerosol products , 2002 .