A Study of Technical Engineering Peer Reviews at NASA
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Kosuke Ishii,et al. Design Process Error-Proofing: Development of Automated Error-Proofing Information Systems , 2003, DAC 2003.
[2] James R. Wertz,et al. Space Mission Analysis and Design , 1992 .
[3] Françoise Détienne,et al. Quantitative Measurements of the Influence of Participant Roles during Peer Review Meetings , 2001, Empirical Software Engineering.
[4] Elaine J. Weyuker. Predicting project risk from architecture reviews , 1999, Proceedings Sixth International Software Metrics Symposium (Cat. No.PR00403).
[5] Lesley Trenner. Prototyping for usability: the benefits of peer group review , 1995 .
[6] J. O'Reilly. Risk, adventure and the tyranny of peer review , 2002 .
[7] J. R. Friedman. An experiment in processing electronic documents , 1997, Proceedings of IPCC 97. Communication.
[8] Nancy G. Leveson. Intent Specifications: An Approach to Building Human-Centered Specifications , 2000, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..
[9] D. Dörner. The logic of failure. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[10] P. Eibeck. Criteria for peer-review of engineering courseware on the NEEDS database , 1996 .
[11] Kosuke Ishii,et al. Design Process Error Proofing: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis of the Design Process , 2007 .
[12] Edward F. Gehringer,et al. Strategies and mechanisms for electronic peer review , 2000, 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135).