Independent Versus Nonindependent Mate Choice: Do Females Copy Each Other?

There is increasing evidence from both observational and experimental studies that females may copy each other's mating decisions. Female copying can be defined as a type of nonindependent choice in which the probability that a female chooses a given male increases if other females have chosen that male and decreases if they have not. The important characteristic of copying behavior that separates it from other similar processes is that the change in the probability of choice is strictly because of the actions of other females and not the consequences of those actions (e.g., a male's behavior changing as a result of successful matings). A gametheory model suggests that the adaptive significance of female copying may depend primarily on the ratio of the costs to the benefits of active mate choice. Copying behavior, and more generally conspecific cueing, may be important in many behavioral processes beyond mate choice.

[1]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1967 .

[2]  S. Pruett-Jones,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION THROUGH FEMALE CHOICE IN LAWES' PAROTIA, A LEK‐MATING BIRD OF PARADISE , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE “HANDICAP” PRINCIPLE , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  M. Gross,et al.  Costs and Benefits of Female Mate Choice: Is There a Lek Paradox? , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[5]  A. Lill,et al.  Sexual behavior of the lek-forming white-bearded manakin (Manacus manacus trinitatis Hartert). , 2010, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[6]  A. Balmford Mate choice on leks. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  J. Höglund,et al.  Copying the Mate Choice of Others? Observations On Female Black Grouse , 1990 .

[8]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[9]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Sexual Selection and Imitation: Females Copy the Mate Choice of Others , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[10]  J. Bradbury,et al.  Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display , 1991 .

[11]  J. Seger UNIFYING GENETIC MODELS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  A. Pomiankowski The costs of choice in sexual selection. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  Andrew Pomiankowski,et al.  How to find the top male , 1990, Nature.

[14]  M. Ridley,et al.  Female Sticklebacks Prefer To Spawn With Males Whose Nests Contain Eggs , 1981 .

[15]  R. Lande Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  A R Kiester,et al.  A strategy of movement and resource utilization. , 1974, Theoretical population biology.

[17]  R. H. Wiley Lekking in Birds and Mammals: Behavioral and Evolutionary Issues , 1991 .

[18]  M. Wade,et al.  Female copying and sexual selection in a marine isopod crustacean, Paracerceis sculpta , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Feller William,et al.  An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications , 1950 .

[20]  J. Lifjeld,et al.  On the cost of searching for a mate in female pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  M. Kirkpatrick SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  A. Bisazza,et al.  Males whose nests contain eggs are preferred by female Cottus gobio L. (Pisces, Cottidae) , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  P. Colgan,et al.  Eggs in the nests of males and their effect on mate choice in the three-spined stickleback , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  S. Rohwer Parent Cannibalism of Offspring and Egg Raiding as a Courtship Strategy , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[25]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Mate choice on fallow deer leks , 1989, Nature.

[26]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Optimization Theory in Evolution , 1978 .

[27]  Rh. Wiley,et al.  Territoriality and non-random mating in sage grouse , 1973 .

[28]  M J Wade,et al.  Female copying increases the variance in male mating success. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  J. G. van Rhijn,et al.  Behavioural dimorphism in male ruffs Philomachus pugnax (L.) , 1973 .

[30]  Hans Landel A study of female and male mating behavior and female mate choice in the sharp-tailed grouse, Tympanuchus phasianellus jamesi , 1989 .

[31]  P. O'donald A general model of sexual and natural selection , 1967, Heredity.

[32]  A. J. Hogan-Warburg Social Behavior of the Ruff, Philomachus Pugnax (L.) , 1965 .

[33]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[34]  Andrew Pomiankowski,et al.  The evolution of female mating preferences for male genetic quality , 1988 .

[35]  UDO M. SAVALLI,et al.  Female choice , 1989, Nature.

[36]  L. Real Search Theory and Mate Choice. I. Models of Single-Sex Discrimination , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[37]  T. Telecky,et al.  Copying Others, an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy for Mate Choice: A Model , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[38]  Allen J Moore,et al.  FEMALE STRATEGY DURING MATE CHOICE: THRESHOLD ASSESSMENT , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  I. L. Heisler A QUANTITATIVE GENETIC MODEL FOR THE ORIGIN OF MATING PREFERENCES , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[40]  T. Wolski Social behavior of the cat. , 1982, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.