Microscopic characterization of FO/PRO membranes--a comparative study of CLSM, TEM and SEM.

Osmotically driven membrane processes (including forward osmosis (FO) and pressure retarded osmosis (PRO)) have received increasing attention in recent decades. The performance of an FO/PRO membrane is significantly limited by internal concentration polarization, which is a strong function of the membrane support layer pore structure. The objective of the current study was to develop microscopic characterization methods for quantitative/semiquantitative analysis of membrane pore structure (both pore diameter and porosity distribution across membrane thickness). The use of confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) for noninvasive characterization of the internal pore structure of FO/PRO membranes is reported for the first time. By performing optical sectioning, information on pore diameter, porosity depth profile and pore connectivity can be obtained. The CLSM porosity results are further compared to those obtained using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and reasonably good agreement was observed. A comparison of these characterization methods reveals their complementary nature, and a combination of these techniques may allow a more comprehensive understanding of membrane structure. The current study also provided a comprehensive insight into the pore structure of commercially available FO/PRO membranes.

[1]  Menachem Elimelech.  Yale constructs forward osmosis desalination pilot plant , 2007 .

[2]  Kyung-Min Yeon,et al.  Characterization of biofilm structure and its effect on membrane permeability in MBR for dye wastewater treatment. , 2006, Water research.

[3]  M. Reinhard,et al.  Characterization of isolated polyamide thin films of RO and NF membranes using novel TEM techniques , 2010 .

[4]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[5]  Rong Wang,et al.  Modeling salt accumulation in osmotic membrane bioreactors: Implications for FO membrane selection a , 2011 .

[6]  Ngai Yin Yip,et al.  Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process , 2005 .

[8]  M. Ulbricht,et al.  Characterizing solute binding to macroporous ion exchange membrane adsorbers using confocal laser scanning microscopy , 2006 .

[9]  Emile R Cornelissen,et al.  Experimental studies and modeling on concentration polarization in forward osmosis. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Use of reverse osmosis membranes to remove perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) from semiconductor wastewater. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Rong Wang,et al.  A modeling investigation on optimizing the design of forward osmosis hollow fiber modules , 2012 .

[12]  C. D. Moody,et al.  Drinking water from sea water by forward osmosis , 1976 .

[13]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Network modeling for studying the effect of support structure on internal concentration polarization , 2011 .

[14]  S. Okayama,et al.  Penetration and energy-loss theory of electrons in solid targets , 1972 .

[15]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes , 2010 .

[16]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[17]  Anthony G Fane,et al.  Direct microscopic observation of forward osmosis membrane fouling. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Double-skinned forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly—FO performance and fouling behavior , 2012 .

[19]  L. Kong,et al.  3-Dimensional characterization of membrane with nanoporous structure using TEM tomography and image analysis , 2010 .

[20]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  A novel ammonia–carbon dioxide osmotic heat engine for power generation , 2007 .

[21]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Effect of draw solution concentration and operating conditions on forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis performance in a spiral wound module , 2010 .

[22]  Rong Wang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes , 2011 .

[23]  Jun Wang,et al.  Detailed analysis of membrane adsorber pore structure and protein binding by advanced microscopy , 2008 .

[24]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Thin-film composite hollow fiber membranes for Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO) process with high power density , 2012 .

[25]  C. Charcosset.  Comparison of microporous membrane morphologies using confocal scanning laser microscopy , 2000 .

[26]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration , 2010 .

[27]  Leyuan Shi,et al.  Effect of substrate structure on the performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes , 2011 .

[28]  Linda Zou,et al.  Recent developments in forward osmosis : opportunities and challenges. , 2012 .

[29]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Boric acid permeation in forward osmosis membrane processes: modeling, experiments, and implications. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Osmotic power production from salinity gradient resource by pressure retarded osmosis: Effects of operating conditions and reverse solute diffusion , 2012 .

[31]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Characterization of asymmetry in microporous membranes by cross-sectional confocal laser scanning mi , 2011 .

[32]  Ho Kyong Shon,et al.  Physicochemical pretreatment of seawater: fouling reduction and membrane characterization , 2009 .

[33]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characteristics and potential applications of a novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membrane , 2010 .

[34]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Synthesis of high flux forward osmosis membranes by chemically crosslinked layer-by-layer polyelectr , 2011 .

[35]  J. Lichtman,et al.  Optical sectioning microscopy , 2005, Nature Methods.

[36]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Study of integration of forward osmosis and biological process: Membrane performance under elevated salt environment , 2011 .

[37]  D.J.H. Harmsen,et al.  Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge , 2008 .

[38]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. , 2007, Water research.

[39]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes , 2009 .

[40]  Guy Z. Ramon,et al.  Membrane-based production of salinity-gradient power , 2011 .

[41]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance , 2006 .

[42]  Viatcheslav Freger,et al.  Swelling and morphology of the skin layer of polyamide composite membranes: an atomic force microscopy study. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[43]  S. Loeb,et al.  Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane , 1997 .