Noise enhancement of information transfer in crayfish mechanoreceptors by stochastic resonance

IN linear information theory, electrical engineering and neurobiology, random noise has traditionally been viewed as a detriment to information transmission. Stochastic resonance (SR) is a nonlinear, statistical dynamics whereby information flow in a multistate system is enhanced by the presence of optimized, random noise1–4. A major consequence of SR for signal reception is that it makes possible substantial improvements in the detection of weak periodic signals. Although SR has recently been demonstrated in several artificial physical systems5,6, it may also occur naturally, and an intriguing possibility is that biological systems have evolved the capability to exploit SR by optimizing endogenous sources of noise. Sensory systems are an obvious place to look for SR, as they excel at detecting weak signals in a noisy environment. Here we demonstrate SR using external noise applied to crayfish mechanoreceptor cells. Our results show that individual neurons can provide a physiological substrate for SR in sensory systems.

[1]  Santucci,et al.  Stochastic resonance in bistable systems. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[2]  S. Fauve,et al.  Stochastic resonance in a bistable system , 1983 .

[3]  R. Stein.  A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF NEURONAL VARIABILITY. , 1965, Biophysical journal.

[4]  G. P. Moore,et al.  Statistical analysis and functional interpretation of neuronal spike data. , 1966, Annual review of physiology.

[5]  Bruce W. Knight,et al.  Dynamics of Encoding in a Population of Neurons , 1972, The Journal of general physiology.

[6]  Dante R. Chialvo,et al.  Modulated noisy biological dynamics: Three examples , 1993 .

[7]  A. Harreveld,et al.  A Physiological Solution for Freshwater Crustaceans , 1936 .

[8]  B. Mandelbrot,et al.  RANDOM WALK MODELS FOR THE SPIKE ACTIVITY OF A SINGLE NEURON. , 1964, Biophysical journal.

[9]  Catherine Nicolis,et al.  Stochastic aspects of climatic transitions—response to a periodic forcing , 1982 .

[10]  K. Purpura,et al.  Response variability in retinal ganglion cells of primates. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  B. Knight.  The Relationship between the Firing Rate of a Single Neuron and the Level of Activity in a Population of Neurons , 1972, The Journal of general physiology.

[12]  Bulsara,et al.  Time-interval sequences in bistable systems and the noise-induced transmission of information by sensory neurons. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[13]  L. Glass,et al.  Unstable dynamics of a periodically driven oscillator in the presence of noise. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  D. Bliss.  The Biology of Crustacea , 1982 .

[15]  Peter Hänggi,et al.  Stochastic Nonlinear Dynamics Modulated by External Periodic Forces , 1989 .

[16]  L. Glass,et al.  A simple model for phase locking of biological oscillators , 1979, Journal of mathematical biology.

[17]  K. Wiese,et al.  Mechanoreceptors for near-field water displacements in crayfish. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  P M Narins,et al.  Noise susceptibility and immunity of phase locking in amphibian auditory-nerve fibers. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  G. Parisi,et al.  Stochastic resonance in climatic change , 1982 .

[20]  DeForest Mellon,et al.  ELECTRICAL RESPONSES FROM DUALLY INNERVATED TACTILE RECEPTORS ON THE THORAX OF THE CRAYFISH , 1963 .

[21]  Wiesenfeld,et al.  Theory of stochastic resonance. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[22]  R. Barlow,et al.  Circadian clock in Limulus brain increases response and decreases noise of retinal photoreceptors , 1980, Nature.

[23]  Tyler B. Coplen,et al.  Continuous 500,000-Year Climate Record from Vein Calcite in Devils Hole, Nevada , 1992, Science.

[24]  J. E. Rose,et al.  Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.