On the Use of Experiments in Design Science Research: A Proposition of an Evaluation Framework

Although experiments are considered a valid scientific method for evaluating the outcome of design science research (DSR), only minimal procedural guidelines or standards exist that help researchers in the setup and conduct. To take advantage of and encourage researchers to include design experiments as an inherent part of their build and test cycle, this study proposes a set of guidelines. In order to get a broad overview of how researchers currently apply the experimental method in DSR and to detect potential drawbacks, an extensive review of the extant literature was conducted. On this basis, we propose an evaluation framework that complements the general design science research guidelines of Hevner and colleagues. The purpose of this framework is to assist researchers, reviewers, editors, and readers in understanding possible pitfalls as well as to ask the right questions which need to be answered in the conduct of design experiments.

[1]  Robert Winter,et al.  Essential Layers, Artifacts, and Dependencies of Enterprise Architecture , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW'06).

[2]  Kentaro Toyama,et al.  Mobile phones and paper documents: evaluating a new approach for capturing microfinance data in rural India , 2006, CHI.

[3]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  DESIGN THEORIES IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS - A NEED FOR MULTI-GROUNDING , 2004 .

[4]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project , 2008 .

[5]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Pygmalion in the classroom , 1968 .

[6]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Management Design Theories , 2010, Human Benefit through the Diffusion of Information Systems Design Science Research.

[7]  John R. Venable,et al.  The role of theory and theorising in Design Science research , 2006 .

[8]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[9]  Imre Horváth,et al.  MODELING DESIGN PROCESSES AND DESIGNER DECISIONS WITH ADVANCED PETRI-NETS , 2000 .

[10]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  A Design Theory Approach to Building Strategic Network-Based Customer Service Systems , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[11]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Strategies for Design Science Research Evaluation , 2008, ECIS.

[12]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Building theory in the sciences of the artificial , 2009, DESRIST.

[13]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Being Proactive: Where Action Research Meets Design Research , 2005, ICIS.

[14]  Kamal Bhattacharya,et al.  Modeling Business Contexture and Behavior Using Business Artifacts , 2007, CAiSE.

[15]  Wojciech Tarnowski,et al.  The Structure of the Design Process , 1986 .

[16]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial - 3rd Edition , 1981 .

[17]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[18]  H. Simon The Sciences of the Artificial, (Third edition) , 1997 .

[19]  Juha-Pekka Tolvanen,et al.  Managing Evolutionary Method Engineering by Method Rationale , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Harry Budi Santoso,et al.  Measuring the user experience , 2008 .

[21]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[22]  Edwin G. Boring,et al.  The Physical Dimensions Of Consciousness , 2015 .

[23]  Marten Schönherr,et al.  Artifact Types in Information Systems Design Science - A Literature Review , 2010, DESRIST.

[24]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[25]  Sven A Carlsson,et al.  Design Science Research in Information Systems: A Critical Realist Perspective , 2006 .

[26]  Shari Lawrence Pfleeger,et al.  Preliminary Guidelines for Empirical Research in Software Engineering , 2002, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[27]  Richard Coyne,et al.  Logic models of design , 1988 .

[28]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Robert Winter Organisational design and engineering: proposal of a conceptual framework and comparison of business engineering with other approaches , 2010 .

[30]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Gilbert R. Fischer Search for Ethics , 1971, Ethics.

[32]  George M. Kasper,et al.  A Theory of Decision Support System Design for User Calibration , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Design Research in the Technology of Information Systems: Truth or Dare , 2002 .

[35]  Jane Davenport Platko Ma In Search of Ethics , 2009 .

[36]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Robert Winter,et al.  Design science research in Europe , 2008 .

[38]  Pertti Järvinen On Reviewing of Results in Design Research , 2007, ECIS.

[39]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[40]  Judy McKay,et al.  Science, Design, and Design Science: Seeking Clarity to Move Design Science Research Forward in Information Systems , 2007 .

[41]  Adam A. Porter,et al.  Empirical studies of software engineering: a roadmap , 2000, ICSE '00.

[42]  Leonard Adelman,et al.  Experiments, quasi-experiments, and case studies: A review of empirical methods for evaluating decision support systems , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[43]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  What design science is not , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Tobias Mettler,et al.  Maturity assessment models: a design science research approach , 2011 .

[45]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  An expert system for dynamic re-coordination of distributed workflows , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[46]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Promoting Relevance in IS Research: An Informing System for Design Science Research , 2011, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[47]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[48]  Pericles Loucopoulos,et al.  The time dimension in conceptual modelling , 1991, Inf. Syst..

[49]  David N. Chin Empirical Evaluation of User Models and User-Adapted Systems , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[50]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology , 2007 .

[51]  Roel Wieringa,et al.  Design science as nested problem solving , 2009, DESRIST.

[52]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Explanatory Design Theory , 2010, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[53]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Roberto Basili,et al.  Distributional lexical semantics: Toward uniform representation paradigms for advanced acquisition and processing tasks , 2010, Natural Language Engineering.

[56]  Claes Wohlin,et al.  Experimentation in software engineering: an introduction , 2000 .

[57]  Shui-Lung Chuang,et al.  Taxonomy generation for text segments: A practical web-based approach , 2005, TOIS.

[58]  Colette Rolland,et al.  An Assembly Process Model for Method Engineering , 2001, CAiSE.

[59]  Terje Brasethvik,et al.  Semantic enrichment for improving systems interoperability , 2004, SAC '04.

[60]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  The Design Theory Nexus , 2008, MIS Q..

[61]  C. Urquhart An encounter with grounded theory: tackling the practical and philosophical issues , 2001 .

[62]  Andrew C. Wicks,et al.  Organization Studies and the New Pragmatism: Positivism, Anti-Positivism, and the Search for Ethics , 1998 .

[63]  Paul Veerkamp,et al.  Modeling design processes , 1990 .

[64]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead ... long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan , 2000 .

[65]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[66]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Evaluation Risks in Design Science Research: A Framework , 2008 .

[67]  B. Chandrasekaran,et al.  Design Problem Solving: A Task Analysis , 1990, AI Mag..

[68]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools , 1996, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[69]  Graham Pervan,et al.  An assessment of DSS design science using the Hevner, March, Park, and Ram guidelines. , 2008 .

[70]  Tobias Mettler,et al.  Situational maturity models as instrumental artifacts for organizational design , 2009, DESRIST.

[71]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.