Efficient gamma index calculation using fast Euclidean distance transform.

The gamma index is a tool for dose distribution comparison. It combines both dose difference (DD) and distance to agreement (DTA) into a single quantity. Though it is an effective measure, making up for the inadequacy of DD or DTA alone, its calculation can be very time-consuming. For a k-D space with N quantization levels in each dimension, the complexity of the exhaustive search is O(N(2k)). In this work, we proposed an efficient method that reduces the complexity from O(N(2k)) to O(N(k)M), where M is the number of discretized dose values and is comparable to N. More precisely, by embedding the reference dose distribution in a (k+1)-D spatial-dose space, we can use fast Euclidean distance transform with linear complexity to obtain a table of gamma indices evaluated over a range of the (k+1)-D spatial-dose space. Then, to obtain gamma indices for the test dose distribution, it requires only table lookup with complexity O(N(k)). Such a table can also be used for other test dose distributions as long as the reference dose distribution is the same. Simulations demonstrated the efficiency of our proposed method. The speedup for 3D gamma index calculation is expected to be on the order of tens of thousands (from O(N(6)) to O(N(3)M)) if N is a few hundreds, which makes clinical usage of the 3D gamma index feasible. A byproduct of the gamma index table is that the gradient of the gamma index with respect to either the spatial or dose dimension can be easily derived. The gradient can be used to identify the main causes of the discrepancy from the reference distribution at any dose point in the test distribution or incorporated in treatment planning and machine parameter optimization.

[1]  J. Cygler,et al.  Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  David G. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Linear Time Euclidean Distance Algorithms , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Shi-Jinn Horng,et al.  Parallel Computation of the Euclidean Distance Transform on the Mesh of Trees and the Hypercube Computer , 1997, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[4]  D. Low,et al.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[5]  D A Low,et al.  A software tool for the quantitative evaluation of 3D dose calculation algorithms. , 1998, Medical physics.

[6]  Benoit M. Macq,et al.  Fast and exact signed Euclidean distance transformation with linear complexity , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).

[7]  D. Huyskens,et al.  A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  J. Dempsey,et al.  Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method. , 2003, Medical physics.

[9]  Timothy D. Solberg,et al.  Patient specific quality assurance for the delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy , 2003, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[10]  M. Alber,et al.  A revision of the γ-evaluation concept for the comparison of dose distributions , 2003 .

[11]  Calvin R. Maurer,et al.  A Linear Time Algorithm for Computing Exact Euclidean Distance Transforms of Binary Images in Arbitrary Dimensions , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  M. Stock,et al.  Interpretation and evaluation of the γ index and the γ index angle for the verification of IMRT hybrid plans , 2005 .

[13]  Steve B Jiang,et al.  On dose distribution comparison. , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  A fast algorithm for gamma evaluation in 3D. , 2007, Medical physics.

[15]  J. Deasy,et al.  Geometric interpretation of the gamma dose distribution comparison technique: interpolation-free calculation. , 2008, Medical physics.