A modular and extensible RNA-based gene-regulatory platform for engineering cellular function

Engineered biological systems hold promise in addressing pressing human needs in chemical processing, energy production, materials construction, and maintenance and enhancement of human health and the environment. However, significant advancements in our ability to engineer biological systems have been limited by the foundational tools available for reporting on, responding to, and controlling intracellular components in living systems. Portable and scalable platforms are needed for the reliable construction of such communication and control systems across diverse organisms. We report an extensible RNA-based framework for engineering ligand-controlled gene-regulatory systems, called ribozyme switches, that exhibits tunable regulation, design modularity, and target specificity. These switch platforms contain a sensor domain, comprised of an aptamer sequence, and an actuator domain, comprised of a hammerhead ribozyme sequence. We examined two modes of standardized information transmission between these domains and demonstrate a mechanism that allows for the reliable and modular assembly of functioning synthetic RNA switches and regulation of ribozyme activity in response to various effectors. In addition to demonstrating examples of small molecule-responsive, in vivo functional, allosteric hammerhead ribozymes, this work describes a general approach for the construction of portable and scalable gene-regulatory systems. We demonstrate the versatility of the platform in implementing application-specific control systems for small molecule-mediated regulation of cell growth and noninvasive in vivo sensing of metabolite production.

[1]  A. L. Koch.  The metabolism of methylpurines by Escherichia coli. I. Tracer studies. , 1956, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[2]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[3]  N. Sonenberg,et al.  Insertion mutagenesis to increase secondary structure within the 5′ noncoding region of a eukaryotic mRNA reduces translational efficiency , 1985, Cell.

[4]  H. Sambrook.  Molecular cloning : a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY , 1989 .

[5]  L. Gold,et al.  Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. , 1990, Science.

[6]  J. Szostak,et al.  In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands , 1990, Nature.

[7]  M. Gossen,et al.  Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  G. Caponigro,et al.  A small segment of the MAT alpha 1 transcript promotes mRNA decay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a stimulatory role for rare codons , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[9]  A. Pardi,et al.  High-resolution molecular discrimination by RNA. , 1994, Science.

[10]  F. Eckstein,et al.  The structure, function and application of the hammerhead ribozyme. , 1997, European journal of biochemistry.

[11]  H. Bujard,et al.  Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  Ronald R. Breaker,et al.  Allosteric selection of ribozymes that respond to the second messengers cGMP and cAMP , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[13]  R. Breaker,et al.  Engineering precision RNA molecular switches. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  R R Breaker,et al.  Altering molecular recognition of RNA aptamers by allosteric selection. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  D. Patel,et al.  Adaptive recognition by nucleic acid aptamers. , 2000, Science.

[16]  S. Avery,et al.  Destabilized green fluorescent protein for monitoring dynamic changes in yeast gene expression with flow cytometry , 2000, Yeast.

[17]  C. Berens,et al.  A tetracycline-binding RNA aptamer. , 2001, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[18]  H. Hatanaka,et al.  Purification, Characterization, and Gene Cloning of Purine Nucleosidase from Ochrobactrum anthropi , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[19]  G. Soukup,et al.  A versatile communication module for controlling RNA folding and catalysis. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  Barbara Fink,et al.  Tetracycline‐aptamer‐mediated translational regulation in yeast , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[21]  Sequence elements outside the hammerhead ribozyme catalytic core enable intracellular activity , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[22]  R. D'Amato,et al.  Exogenous control of mammalian gene expression through modulation of RNA self-cleavage , 2004, Nature.

[23]  J. Collins,et al.  Programmable cells: interfacing natural and engineered gene networks. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Kiyoji Nishiwaki,et al.  Structure of the yeast HIS5 gene responsive to general control of amino acid biosynthesis , 1987, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[25]  R. Breaker,et al.  Gene regulation by riboswitches , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  D. Endy.  Foundations for engineering biology , 2005, Nature.

[27]  P. Marschall,et al.  Inhibition of gene expression with ribozymes , 1994, Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology.

[28]  Travis S. Bayer,et al.  Programmable ligand-controlled riboregulators of eukaryotic gene expression , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[29]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  RNA synthetic biology , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  Yohei Yokobayashi,et al.  Artificial control of gene expression in mammalian cells by modulating RNA interference through aptamer-small molecule interaction. , 2006, RNA.

[31]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Genetic parts to program bacteria. , 2006, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[32]  D. Bunka,et al.  Aptamers come of age – at last , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.