Ethnography and the disputes over validity

What counts as ethnography and what counts as good ethnographic methodology are both highly contested. Volume 6 of this expanding series of books draws together a collection of chapters presenting a diversity of views on some of the current debates and developments in ethnographic methodology. It does not try to present a single coherent view but, through its heterogeneity, illustrates the strength and liveliness of debate within this area. The chapters cover central topics such as the challenges to conventional views about validity in ethnographic work, feminist research, comparison within ethnographic research, the public identification of research sites, and the ethics and practice of research involving children. Other chapters deal with relatively newer topics such as the conduct of electronic ethnography, the development of the imagination and emotion within ethnographic writing, and the use of hypertext in the analysis and representation of ethnographic work. Together, the chapters bring to life current developments and debates in ethnographic research.

[1]  M. Hammersley The politics of social research , 1995 .

[2]  R. Stavenhagen Decolonializing Applied Social Sciences (includes comments and author's reply) , 1971 .

[3]  J. Smith The Problem of Criteria for Judging Interpretive Inquiry , 1984 .

[4]  N. Burbules,et al.  Postpositivism and educational research , 1986 .

[5]  M. Hammersley What's Wrong With Ethnography? , 1991 .

[6]  Patti Lather Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place , 1986 .

[7]  Patti Lather FERTILE OBSESSION: Validity After Poststructuralism , 1993 .

[8]  Howard S. Becker,et al.  Whose Side are we on , 1967 .

[9]  M. Hammersley,et al.  Constructing educational inequality : an assessment of research on school processes , 1996 .

[10]  M. Siegel,et al.  The politics of method: from leftist ethnography to educative research , 1989 .

[11]  N. Denzin Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century , 1996 .

[12]  J. Goldthorpe On Sociology: Numbers, Narratives, and the Integration of Research and Theory , 2000 .

[13]  I. Dey Grounding grounded theory : guidelines for qualitative inquiry , 1999 .

[14]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[15]  Ann Oakley,et al.  Experiments in Knowing: Gender and Method in the Social Sciences , 2001 .

[16]  C. Weiss The many meanings of research utilization. , 1979 .

[17]  C. Weiss,et al.  Social science research and decision-making , 1980 .

[18]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Varieties of social research: A typology , 2000 .

[19]  Paul Atkinson,et al.  ETHNOGRAPHY Post, Past, and Present , 1999 .

[20]  Varieties of social research , 1998 .

[21]  Paul Connolly,et al.  Researching Racism in Education: Politics, Theory and Practice , 1998 .

[22]  J. Potter Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction , 1996 .

[23]  J. Keeves Educational research, methodology, and measurement , 1988 .

[24]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Reading ethnographic research , 1991 .

[25]  M. Hammersley Educational Research, Policymaking and Practice , 2002 .

[26]  Thomas A. Schwandt Farewell to Criteriology , 1996 .

[27]  Kate Lenzo Validity and Self-Reflexivity Meet Poststructuralism: Scientific Ethos and the Transgressive Self , 1995 .

[28]  M. Hammersley NOT BRICOLAGE BUT BOATBUILDING , 1999 .

[29]  M. Hammersley,et al.  Case Studies as Spurious Evaluations: The Example of Research on Educatioal Inequalities , 2000 .

[30]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Bias in Social Research , 1997 .

[31]  Zygmunt Bauman,et al.  Legislators and interpreters , 1987 .