Human Wavelength Discrimination of Monochromatic Light Explained by Optimal Wavelength Decoding of Light of Unknown Intensity

We show that human ability to discriminate the wavelength of monochromatic light can be understood as maximum likelihood decoding of the cone absorptions, with a signal processing efficiency that is independent of the wavelength. This work is built on the framework of ideal observer analysis of visual discrimination used in many previous works. A distinctive aspect of our work is that we highlight a perceptual confound that observers should confuse a change in input light wavelength with a change in input intensity. Hence a simple ideal observer model which assumes that an observer has a full knowledge of input intensity should over-estimate human ability in discriminating wavelengths of two inputs of unequal intensity. This confound also makes it difficult to consistently measure human ability in wavelength discrimination by asking observers to distinguish two input colors while matching their brightness. We argue that the best experimental method for reliable measurement of discrimination thresholds is the one of Pokorny and Smith, in which observers only need to distinguish two inputs, regardless of whether they differ in hue or brightness. We mathematically formulate wavelength discrimination under this wavelength-intensity confound and show a good agreement between our theoretical prediction and the behavioral data. Our analysis explains why the discrimination threshold varies with the input wavelength, and shows how sensitively the threshold depends on the relative densities of the three types of cones in the retina (and in particular predict discriminations in dichromats). Our mathematical formulation and solution can be applied to general problems of sensory discrimination when there is a perceptual confound from other sensory feature dimensions.

[1]  H. Barlow,et al.  A method of determining the overall quantum efficiency of visual discriminations , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Vision: Coding and Efficiency , 1991 .

[3]  W. Geisler Sequential ideal-observer analysis of visual discriminations. , 1989, Psychological review.

[4]  D. Baylor,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of cones of the monkey Macaca fascicularis. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  P K Ahnelt,et al.  Identification of a subtype of cone photoreceptor, likely to be blue sensitive, in the human retina , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  D. Mollon,et al.  The two subsystems of colour vision and their roles in wavelength discrimination , 2011 .

[7]  R. L. Valois,et al.  Primate color vision. , 1968, Science.

[8]  D. Macleod,et al.  Spectral sensitivities of the human cones. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  D. Macleod,et al.  Isolation of the middle- and long-wavelength-sensitive cones in normal trichromats. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  Kang Chen,et al.  Visual Attention and Eye Movements , 2008 .

[11]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  The physical limits of grating visibility , 1987, Vision Research.

[12]  G. Wyszecki,et al.  Wavelength discrimination for point sources. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[13]  H B Barlow,et al.  Measurements of the quantum efficiency of discrimination in human scotopic vision , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  A. Stockman,et al.  The S-cone contribution to luminance depends on the M- and L-cone adaptation levels: silent surrounds? , 2009, Journal of vision.

[15]  W. D. Wright,et al.  Hue-discrimination in normal colour-vision , 1934 .

[16]  D. Pelli The quantum efficiency of vision , 1990 .

[17]  Gerald H. Jacobs Primate color vision , 2012 .

[18]  C. M. Cicerone,et al.  The density of cones in the fovea centralis of the human dichromat , 1989, Vision Research.

[19]  J. J. Vos,et al.  On the derivation of the foveal receptor primaries. , 1971, Vision research.

[20]  V C Smith,et al.  Wavelength discrimination in the presence of added chromatic fields. , 1970, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[21]  J. Bowmaker,et al.  Visual pigments of rods and cones in a human retina. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  K. Naka,et al.  S‐potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae) , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm , 1975, Vision Research.

[24]  K Knoblauch Theory of wavelength discrimination in tritanopia. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  David Williams,et al.  2 – Light, the Retinal Image, and Photoreceptors , 2003 .

[26]  W. D. Wright The characteristics of tritanopia. , 1952, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[27]  A. Stockman,et al.  The spectral sensitivities of the middle- and long-wavelength-sensitive cones derived from measurements in observers of known genotype , 2000, Vision Research.