Evaluation of a computer networking class in information technology

Information Technology (IT) is a rapidly-developing discipline. IT instructors often design new courses to meet changing needs. There is also a need to evaluate courses once they have been designed and implemented. Evaluation of courses leads to improvements in the learning experiences for students and better understanding of the educational process and outcomes for course designers and instructors. Evaluation and improvement of quality is a requirement for programs accredited under ABET (and other accrediting bodies). A networking class in IT was selected for evaluation. Networking was selected because it is one of the core required topics in the IT curriculum. The course was compared to national standards for curriculum in the networking area. A single class was evaluated but methods were developed which can be applied to other courses in the IT discipline. The evaluation study included evaluation of the course content and the course structure. Student input was obtained through a survey instrument and the validity of the input was considered. Several questions were identified for this evaluation: Did the networking class meet student needs and expectations in terms of content and teaching approach; What are the students preferred learning styles; What coursework should a networking class include compared to what was actually taught; Did success in the earlier foundation class lead to success in the networking class; How well did students perform in this class relative to their performance in the IT major as a whole? Pursuing these questions involved data gathering from students as well as researching student records. Appropriate mechanisms were developed to protect student privacy. The evaluation of this class led to a number of useful insights and recommendations into technical class content, teaching and learning styles, and into the evaluation process. The methods of the study can be used for other courses and for other IT programs.

[1]  Stephen J. Zilora,et al.  Take a WAC at writing in your course , 2007, SIGITE '07.

[2]  Pm Jenkinson,et al.  Cognitive , 2020, Definitions.

[3]  C. Richard G. Helps,et al.  Design of a flexible case-study instructional module for operating systems for information technology , 2004, CITC5 '04.

[4]  R. Schaller,et al.  Moore's law: past, present and future , 1997 .

[5]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[6]  G.E. Moore,et al.  Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Raymond A. Hansen,et al.  Laboratory modules for conducting comparative analysis of 802.11 frames , 2007, SIGITE '07.

[8]  C. Richard Helps,et al.  Uml And Design Layers Provide A Course Design Paradigm And Notation To Create Robust Technology Courses In Rapidly Changing Environments , 2005 .

[9]  Alessio Gaspar,et al.  Restoring "coding with intention" in introductory programming courses , 2007, SIGITE '07.

[10]  C.H.E. Kwakman,et al.  Conversational learning. An experiential approach to knowledge creation , 2004 .

[11]  Jill E. Courte Comparing student acceptance and performance of online activities to classroom activities , 2007, SIGITE '07.

[12]  Sandra Gorka,et al.  Developing realistic capstone projects in conjunction with industry , 2007, SIGITE '07.

[13]  Edward J. Mirielli,et al.  Student reflections on an academic service learning experience in a computer science classroom , 2007, SIGITE '07.

[14]  Lisa M. Frye Wireless sensor networks: learning and teaching , 2007, SIGITE '07.

[15]  R. Slavin Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .

[16]  Kay C. Bryant The Evaluation of Courses in Information Systems , 2004, ACE.

[17]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[18]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom , 2006 .

[19]  Michael D. Kane,et al.  Integrating bioinformatics, distributed data management, and distributed computing for applied training in high performance computing , 2007, SIGITE '07.

[20]  Stephen Renshaw,et al.  A multi-part lab exercise for analyzing the effect of peer-to-peer software on a university network , 2007, SIGITE '07.

[21]  Paul Strooper,et al.  Evaluation of a new assessment scheme for a third-year concurrency course , 2007 .