“Cost” of virginity in wild Drosophila melanogaster females

Laboratory studies have revealed a significant “cost of mating” to Drosophila melanogaster females in the form of reduced longevity. The effect is attributable to nonsperm components of the ejaculate. Female D. melanogaster are known to mate up to six times in nature, and given that they do not typically remate daily, it raises the question as to the extent to which the longevity of wild mated females is reduced. Here I addressed this question by comparing the longevity of wild virgin females, collected as they emerged from rotting fruit, to the longevity of randomly collected mature females at the same site. Because the randomly collected females all were inseminated and were fully pigmented at the time of collection, they already were older than the virgins when the experiment began. Contrary to expectations from laboratory studies, the older, mated females lived significantly longer than the virgins. Rather than a “cost of mating,” there appears to be a “cost of virginity” to female D. melanogaster in the wild.

[1]  J. Mensch,et al.  The effect of mating on starvation resistance in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster , 2011, Evolutionary Ecology.

[2]  T. Chapman,et al.  Adaptations to sexual selection and sexual conflict: insights from experimental evolution and artificial selection , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  W. Anderson,et al.  Polyandry increases offspring viability and mother productivity but does not decrease mother survival in Drosophila pseudoobscura , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  T. Chapman,et al.  Female nutritional status determines the magnitude and sign of responses to a male ejaculate signal in Drosophila melanogaster , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[5]  P. Innocenti,et al.  Immunogenic males: a genome‐wide analysis of reproduction and the cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[6]  W. Rice,et al.  Assessing the extent of genome‐wide intralocus sexual conflict via experimentally enforced gender‐limited selection , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[7]  F. W. Robertson Studies in quantitative inheritance X. Genetic variation of ovary size inDrosophila , 1957, Journal of Genetics.

[8]  Kyung-Jin Min,et al.  Counting calories in Drosophila diet restriction , 2007, Experimental Gerontology.

[9]  W. Rice,et al.  Assessing sexual conflict in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  T. Markow,et al.  Evolutionary genetics of reproductive behavior in Drosophila: connecting the dots. , 2005, Annual review of genetics.

[11]  W. Rice,et al.  Assessing putative interlocus sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster using experimental evolution , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  D. Hosken,et al.  Sexual conflict , 2005, Current Biology.

[13]  T. Chapman,et al.  Sex Peptide Causes Mating Costs in Female Drosophila melanogaster , 2005, Current Biology.

[14]  T. Markow,et al.  Nonantagonistic interactions between the sexes revealed by the ecological consequences of reproductive traits , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[15]  T. Chapman,et al.  FEMALE RESISTANCE TO MALE HARM EVOLVES IN RESPONSE TO MANIPULATION OF SEXUAL CONFLICT , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  R. Griffiths,et al.  Multiple mating and sperm displacement in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster , 1982, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[17]  J. David,et al.  Control of the adult reproductive potential by preimaginal thermal conditions , 2004, Oecologia.

[18]  E. Reeve,et al.  Studies in quantitative inheritance , 2004, Zeitschrift für Induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre.

[19]  T. Chapman,et al.  Response to Eberhard and Cordero, and Córdoba-Aguilar and Contreras-Garduño: sexual conflict and female choice , 2003 .

[20]  T. Markow,et al.  Comparative elemental stoichiometry of ecologically diverse Drosophila , 2003 .

[21]  R. Richmond,et al.  STUDIES OF ESTERASE 6 IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 2003 .

[22]  S. Pitnick,et al.  Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  L. Partridge,et al.  Laboratory Adaptation of Life History in Drosophila , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[24]  Brian H. Raphael,et al.  Elemental stoichiometry of Drosophila and their hosts , 1999 .

[25]  A. Clark,et al.  INFERENCE OF SPERM COMPETITION FROM BROODS OF FIELD‐CAUGHT DROSOPHILA , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  C. Schlötterer,et al.  Multiple mating in wild Drosophila melanogaster revisited by microsatellite analysis , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[27]  W. Rice Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution , 1996, Nature.

[28]  V. French,et al.  RAPID LABORATORY EVOLUTION OF ADULT LIFE‐HISTORY TRAITS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER IN RESPONSE TO TEMPERATURE , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  L. Partridge,et al.  Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products , 1995, Nature.

[30]  T. Markow,et al.  Courtship and remating in field populations of Drosophila , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  L. Partridge,et al.  A cost of mating in female fruitflies , 1989, Nature.

[32]  L. G. Barr,et al.  Local Ecology and Multiple Mating in a Natural Population of Drosophila melanogaster , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[33]  C. Tepper,et al.  Studies of esterase 6 in Drosophila melanogaster—XVI: Synthesis occurs in the male reproductive tract (anterior ejaculatory duct) and is modulated by juvenile hormone , 1984 .

[34]  D. Gilbert,et al.  STUDIES OF ESTERASE 6 IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. V. PROGENY PRODUCTION AND SPERM USE IN FEMALES INSEMINATED BY MALES HAVING ACTIVE OR NULL ALLELES , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  H. Stalker Chromosome Studies in Wild Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. II. Relationship of Inversion Frequencies to Latitude, Season, Wing-Loading and Flight Activity. , 1980, Genetics.

[36]  H. Stalker Chromosome studies in wild populations of D. melanogaster. , 1976, Genetics.

[37]  R. Milkmann,et al.  Concurrent multiple paternity in natural and laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1974, Genetics.

[38]  R. King Ovarian Development in Drosophila Melanogaster , 1970 .