The Role of Fading and Peer-Monitoring in Systems for Online Argumentation: Results from Two Studies

The use of micro-scripts that support students develop argumentation skills has been proved to be effective in the domain of computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Researchers suggest that micro-scripts should also withdraw (fade out) allowing students to practice their skills; however, studies that explore the impact of fading are scarce in the current literature. In order to explore the influence of fading on argumentation-based learning outcomes, we implemented two experimental research studies, using iArgue, a web-based argumentation tool. In our studies we implemented fading and also peer-monitoring as an additional technique to enhance domain-specific learning outcomes. The results from both studies revealed the value of this latter technique as students implementing peer-monitoring outperformed those in the control and the fading groups in knowledge acquisition. Overall, this paper provides evidence that by implementing the peer-monitoring technique during online collaborative argumentation activities, instructors can substantially improve learning outcomes, while simply fading out the micro-script does not seem to have any beneficial impact.

[1]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[2]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials , 2006 .

[3]  Pierre Tchounikine,et al.  Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[4]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Scripting Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Computer-Supported Learning Environments , 2007 .

[5]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[6]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[7]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  The role of floor control and of ontology in argumentative activities with discussion-based tools , 2005, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[8]  M. Baker.  ARGUMENTATION AND CONSTRUCTIVE INTERACTION , 2009 .

[9]  M. Baker.  Argumentative Interactions and the Social Construction of Knowledge , 2009 .

[10]  M. Baker.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED ARGUMENTATIVE INTERACTIONS FOR THE CO-ELABORATION OF SCIENTIFIC NOTIONS , 2003 .

[11]  Christof Wecker,et al.  Fostering online search competence and domain-specific knowledge in inquiry classrooms: effects of continuous and fading collaboration scripts , 2010, ICLS.

[12]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning , 2007, Learning and Instruction.

[13]  J. H. McMillan.  Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research , 2001 .

[14]  N. Rummel,et al.  Learning to Collaborate: An Instructional Approach to Promoting Collaborative Problem Solving in Computer-Mediated Settings , 2005 .

[15]  Anastasios Karakostas,et al.  Fade-out and Peer Monitor Techniques in Tools for Scripted Argumentation: Evaluation Results from a Case Study , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[16]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[17]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2007 .

[18]  Selma Leitão,et al.  The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building , 2000, Human Development.

[19]  Regina Vollmeyer,et al.  A Surprising Effect of Feedback on Learning. , 2005 .

[20]  Detlev Leutner.  Double-fading support - a training approach to complex software systems , 2000, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[21]  Christof Wecker,et al.  Fading scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning: the role of distributed monitoring , 2007, CSCL.

[22]  A. King.  Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. , 1999 .

[23]  Niels Pinkwart,et al.  Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning DOI 10.1007/s11412-009-9080-x Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art , 2009 .

[24]  E. Cohen,et al.  Producing Equal-Status Interaction in the Heterogeneous Classroom , 1995 .

[25]  Philip Bell,et al.  Promoting Students' Argument Construction and Collaborative Debate in the Science Classroom , 2013 .

[26]  Stephen E. Toulmin,et al.  The Uses of Argument, Updated Edition , 2008 .

[27]  Stavros N. Demetriadis,et al.  Peer-monitoring vs. micro-script fading for enhancing knowledge acquisition when learning in computer-supported argumentation environments , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[28]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[29]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Designing Integrative Scripts , 2007 .

[30]  F. Fischer,et al.  Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis , 2006 .

[31]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .