Research on Simulation and Performance Optimization of Mach 4 Civil Aircraft Propulsion Concept

Supersonic civil aircraft is of a promising area in the development of future civil transport, and aircraft propulsion system is one of the key issues which determine the success of the aircraft. To get a good conceptual design and performance investigation of the supersonic civil aircraft engine, in this article, a fast, versatile as well as trust-worthy numerical simulation platform was established to analyze the Mach 4 turbine-based combined cycle (TBCC) engine concept so as to be applied to the supersonic civil aircraft. First, a quick and accurate task requirement analysis module was newly established to analyze the mission requirement of the Mach 4 supersonic civil aircraft. Second, the TBCC engine performance simulation model was briefly presented and the number of engines on the supersonic civil aircraft was analyzed, considering single engine inoperative. Third, the Stone model and the DLR method were investigated to estimate the engine jet noise and the NOx emission of the Mach 4 supersonic civil aircraft. Finally, a multiobjective optimization tool made up of a response surface method and a genetic algorithm was developed to optimize the design parameters and the control law of the TBCC engine, in order to make the Mach 4 supersonic civil aircraft engine with better performance, lower noise, and lower emissions. The uniqueness of the developed analysis tool lies in that it affords a numerical simulation platform capable of investigating the task requirement analysis module of the supersonic civil aircraft, engine jet noise prediction model, and the NOx emission prediction model, as well as a multiobjective performance optimization tool, which is beneficial for the conceptual design and performance research of Mach 4 supersonic civil aircraft’s propulsion system.

[1]  Sebastien Defoort,et al.  Achievements Obtained for Sustained Hypersonic Flight within the LAPCAT project. , 2008 .

[2]  Min Chen,et al.  Matching mechanism analysis on an adaptive cycle engine , 2017 .

[3]  J. H. Goodykoontz,et al.  Experimental study of coaxial nozzle exhaust noise , 1979 .

[4]  A. H. Lefebvre,et al.  Fuel effects on gas turbine combustion-liner temperature, pattern factor, and pollutant emissions , 1984 .

[5]  J. R. Stone,et al.  An improved prediction method for noise generated by conventional profile coaxial jets , 1981 .

[6]  James R. Stone,et al.  An improved prediction method for the noise generated in flight by circular jets , 1980 .

[7]  J. R. Stone,et al.  Interim prediction method for jet noise , 1974 .

[8]  Hailong Tang,et al.  Overall performance design of paralleled heat release and compression system for hypersonic aeroengine , 2018, Applied Energy.

[9]  James R. Stone,et al.  Jet Noise Modeling for Supersonic Business Jet Application , 2013 .

[10]  Min Chen,et al.  Performance Analysis of a Three-Stream Adaptive Cycle Engine during Throttling , 2018 .

[11]  J. Steelant,et al.  LAPCAT: High-Speed Propulsion Technology , 2008 .

[12]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[13]  Scott M. Jones,et al.  A Comparative Propulsion System Analysis for the High-Speed Civil Transport , 2013 .

[14]  K. Sakata,et al.  Supersonic Experimental Airplane (NEXST) for Next Generation SST Technology - Development and flight test plan for the Unmanned Scaled Supersonic Glider , 2002 .

[15]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[16]  John D. Saunders,et al.  Highlights From a Mach 4 Experimental Demonstration of Inlet Mode Transition for Turbine-Based Combined Cycle Hypersonic Propulsion , 2012 .

[17]  Min Chen,et al.  Turbine-based combined cycle propulsion system integration concept design , 2013 .

[18]  A. Döpelheuer,et al.  Influence of engine performance on emission characteristics , 1999 .

[19]  J. Stone,et al.  Conventional profile coaxial jet noise prediction , 1983 .

[20]  James R. Stone,et al.  An improved model for conventional and inverted-velocity-profile coannular jet noise , 1999 .

[21]  J. M. Ngundam,et al.  Prediction of emissions in turbojet engines exhausts: relationship between nitrogen oxides emission index (EINOx) and the operational parameters , 2007 .

[22]  Johan Steelant,et al.  Sustained Hypersonic Flight in Europe: Technology Drivers for LAPCAT II , 2009 .

[23]  N. Rizk,et al.  Semianalytical Correlations for NOx, CO, and UHC Emissions , 1992 .

[24]  Min Chen,et al.  Study on multi-cycle coupling mechanism of hypersonic precooled combined cycle engine , 2018 .

[25]  D. R. Reddy,et al.  Seventy Years of Aeropropulsion Research at NASA Glenn Research Center , 2013 .

[26]  Sebastien Defoort,et al.  Lapcat II : towards a Mach 8 civil aircraft concept , using advanced Rocket/Dual-mode ramjet propulsion system , 2009 .

[27]  N. K. Rizk,et al.  Semianalytical Correlations for NOx, CO, and UHC Emissions , 1993 .

[28]  Min Chen,et al.  Equilibrium running principle analysis on an adaptive cycle engine , 2018 .

[29]  John M. Morgenstern,et al.  Final Report for the Advanced Concept Studies for Supersonic Commercial Transports Entering Service in the 2030 to 2035 Period, N+3 Supersonic Program , 2010 .

[30]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[31]  Ryouma Nogami,et al.  Current status of low pressure turbine component research in HYPR program , 1998 .

[32]  Ronald Slingerland,et al.  Aerodynamic Design of Transport Aircraft , 2009 .