Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria.

Although researchers have begun cataloging the incredible diversity of bacteria found in soil, we are largely unable to interpret this information in an ecological context, including which groups of bacteria are most abundant in different soils and why. With this study, we examined how the abundances of major soil bacterial phyla correspond to the biotic and abiotic characteristics of the soil environment to determine if they can be divided into ecologically meaningful categories. To do this, we collected 71 unique soil samples from a wide range of ecosystems across North America and looked for relationships between soil properties and the relative abundances of six dominant bacterial phyla (Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, alpha-Proteobacteria, and the beta-Proteobacteria). Of the soil properties measured, net carbon (C) mineralization rate (an index of C availability) was the best predictor of phylum-level abundances. There was a negative correlation between Acidobacteria abundance and C mineralization rates (r2 = 0.26, P < 0.001), while the abundances of beta-Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes were positively correlated with C mineralization rates (r2 = 0.35, P < 0.001 and r2 = 0.34, P < 0.001, respectively). These patterns were explored further using both experimental and meta-analytical approaches. We amended soil cores from a specific site with varying levels of sucrose over a 12-month period to maintain a gradient of elevated C availabilities. This experiment confirmed our survey results: there was a negative relationship between C amendment level and the abundance of Acidobacteria (r2 = 0.42, P < 0.01) and a positive relationship for both Bacteroidetes and beta-Proteobacteria (r2 = 0.38 and 0.70, respectively; P < 0.01 for each). Further support for a relationship between the relative abundances of these bacterial phyla and C availability was garnered from an analysis of published bacterial clone libraries from bulk and rhizosphere soils. Together our survey, experimental, and meta-analytical results suggest that certain bacterial phyla can be differentiated into copiotrophic and oligotrophic categories that correspond to the r- and K-selected categories used to describe the ecological attributes of plants and animals. By applying the copiotroph-oligotroph concept to soil microorganisms we can make specific predictions about the ecological attributes of various bacterial taxa and better understand the structure and function of soil bacterial communities.

[1]  Genbank,et al.  APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[2]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  J. Pernthaler,et al.  Bacterial communities associated with benthic organic matter in headwater stream microhabitats. , 2005, Environmental microbiology.

[4]  Jason D. Gans,et al.  Computational Improvements Reveal Great Bacterial Diversity and High Metal Toxicity in Soil , 2005, Science.

[5]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Assessment of Soil Microbial Community Structure by Use of Taxon-Specific Quantitative PCR Assays , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  Jane Tang,et al.  Captured Diversity in a Culture Collection: Case Study of the Geographic and Habitat Distributions of Environmental Isolates Held at the American Type Culture Collection , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[7]  N. Fierer,et al.  LITTER QUALITY AND THE TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY OF DECOMPOSITION , 2005 .

[8]  T. Vogel,et al.  Effect of carbon and nitrogen input on the bacterial community structure of Neocaledonian nickel mine spoils. , 2005, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[9]  Michael J. Rogers,et al.  Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming , 2005, Nature.

[10]  S. Tringe,et al.  Comparative Metagenomics of Microbial Communities , 2004, Science.

[11]  J. Handelsman.  Metagenomics: Application of Genomics to Uncultured Microorganisms , 2004, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[12]  T. Schmidt,et al.  New Strategies for Cultivation and Detection of Previously Uncultured Microbes , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  S. K. Schmidt,et al.  Seasonal Changes in an Alpine Soil Bacterial Community in the Colorado Rocky Mountains , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  L. Gu,et al.  Fast labile carbon turnover obscures sensitivity of heterotrophic respiration from soil to temperature: A model analysis , 2004 .

[15]  D. Button.  Nutrient-limited microbial growth kinetics: overview and recent advances , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[16]  J. Gottschal.  Some reflections on microbial competitiveness among heterotrophic bacteria , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[17]  P. Hugenholtz,et al.  Laboratory Cultivation of Widespread and Previously Uncultured Soil Bacteria , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[18]  C. Jackson.  Changes in community properties during microbial succession , 2003 .

[19]  Jo Handelsman,et al.  A Census of rRNA Genes and Linked Genomic Sequences within a Soil Metagenomic Library , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[20]  J. Snape,et al.  Respiration of 13C-Labeled Substrates Added to Soil in the Field and Subsequent 16S rRNA Gene Analysis of 13C-Labeled Soil DNA , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[21]  P. Hugenholtz,et al.  Cultivation of globally distributed soil bacteria from phylogenetic lineages previously only detected in cultivation-independent surveys. , 2002, Environmental microbiology.

[22]  M. L. Chow,et al.  Molecular characterization of bacterial diversity from British Columbia forest soils subjected to disturbance. , 2002, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[23]  H. Grossart,et al.  Microbial ecology of organic aggregates in aquatic ecosystems , 2002 .

[24]  Lawrence O. Ticknor,et al.  Empirical and Theoretical Bacterial Diversity in Four Arizona Soils , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[25]  David N. Reznick,et al.  r‐ AND K‐SELECTION REVISITED: THE ROLE OF POPULATION REGULATION IN LIFE‐HISTORY EVOLUTION , 2002 .

[26]  L. Øvreås,et al.  Prokaryotic Diversity--Magnitude, Dynamics, and Controlling Factors , 2002, Science.

[27]  P. Janssen,et al.  Improved Culturability of Soil Bacteria and Isolation in Pure Culture of Novel Members of the Divisions Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[28]  D. Kirchman.  The ecology of Cytophaga-Flavobacteria in aquatic environments. , 2002, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[29]  E. Smit,et al.  Diversity and Seasonal Fluctuations of the Dominant Members of the Bacterial Soil Community in a Wheat Field as Determined by Cultivation and Molecular Methods , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[30]  Charles T. Garten,et al.  Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: A review of methods and observations , 2000 .

[31]  T. Schmidt,et al.  rRNA Operon Copy Number Reflects Ecological Strategies of Bacteria , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[32]  G. Robertson,et al.  Decomposition and Soil Organic Matter Dynamics , 2000 .

[33]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Methods in Ecosystem Science , 2000, Springer New York.

[34]  M. Aragno,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity of bacterial communities differing in degree of proximity of Lolium perenne and Trifolium repens roots , 1999 .

[35]  John Dunbar,et al.  Levels of Bacterial Community Diversity in Four Arid Soils Compared by Cultivation and 16S rRNA Gene Cloning , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[36]  C. Kuske,et al.  Wide Distribution and Diversity of Members of the Bacterial Kingdom Acidobacterium in the Environment , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[37]  J. Prosser,et al.  Molecular Analysis of Bacterial Community Structure and Diversity in Unimproved and Improved Upland Grass Pastures , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[38]  T. Egli,et al.  Growth Kinetics of Suspended Microbial Cells: From Single-Substrate-Controlled Growth to Mixed-Substrate Kinetics , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[39]  J. Schimel,et al.  Moisture control over atmospheric CH4 consumption and CO2 production in diverse Alaskan soils , 1998 .

[40]  N. Pace.  A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. , 1997, Science.

[41]  O. Meyer.  Functional Groups of Microorganisms , 1994 .

[42]  R. Knowles,et al.  Physiology, biochemistry, and specific inhibitors of CH4, NH4+, and CO oxidation by methanotrophs and nitrifiers , 1989, Microbiological reviews.

[43]  J. Andrews,et al.  r- and K-Selection and Microbial Ecology , 1986 .

[44]  H. Caspers.  Strategies of Microbial Life in Extreme Environments. Edited by Moshe Shilo. = Life Sciences Research Report 13. – With 43 figs., 24 tab., 514 pp. Weinheim‐New York: Verlag Chemie 1979. ISBN 3‐527‐12002‐5 (Weinheim), 0‐89573‐082‐0 (New York). DM 72.– , 1981 .

[45]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[46]  Eric R. Pianka,et al.  On r- and K-Selection , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[47]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[48]  S. Goldhor.  Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[49]  C. W. Thornthwaite.  An Approach Toward a Rational Classification of Climate , 1948 .