The Enhanced Restricted Focus Viewer

The Enhanced Restricted Focus Viewer (ERFV) is a unique software tool for tracking the visual attention of users in hyperlinked environments, such as Web sites. The software collects data, such as mouse clicks along with the path of users' visual attention, as they browse a site. Unlike traditional eye-tracking procedures, the ERFV requires no hardware to operate other than a personal computer. In addition to time and cost savings, the ERFV allows the administration of usability testing to groups of participants simultaneously. A laboratory test comparing the ERFV to a hardware-based eye-tracking system showed that the two methods compared favorably in terms of how well they track a user's visual attention. The value of the ERFV as a usability testing tool was demonstrated through an experiment that evaluated two Web sites that were equivalent in content but that differed in terms of design. Although several open issues concerning the ERFV still remain, some of these issues are being addressed through ongoing research efforts.

[1]  John R. Anderson,et al.  What can a mouse cursor tell us more?: correlation of eye/mouse movements on web browsing , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[2]  Anna Rumshisky,et al.  Discourse Structure of Text-Graphics Documents , 2001 .

[3]  Peter Tarasewich Designing Usable Web Sites , 2000 .

[4]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  Empirically validated web page design metrics , 2001, CHI.

[5]  Kim Marriott,et al.  A tool for tracking visual attention: The Restricted Focus Viewer , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[6]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The User Interface in a Hypertext, Multiwindow Program Browser , 1989, Interact. Comput..

[7]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Visual attention to repeated internet images: testing the scanpath theory on the world wide web , 2002, ETRA.

[8]  Michael Jenkin,et al.  Vision and Attention , 2001, Springer New York.

[9]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  Restricted Focus Viewer: A Tool for Tracking Visual Attention , 2000, Diagrams.

[10]  H. Ritter,et al.  Disambiguating Complex Visual Information: Towards Communication of Personal Views of a Scene , 1996, Perception.

[11]  Andrea Lockerd Thomaz,et al.  Cheese: tracking mouse movement activity on websites, a tool for user modeling , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  Barry D. Vaughan,et al.  Object-Based Visual Selection: Evidence From Perceptual Completion , 1998 .

[13]  Rico Fischer,et al.  Eye tracking and its application in usability and media research , 2003, MMI Interakt..

[14]  Peter Tarasewich An Investigation Into Web Site Design Complexity and Usability Metrics1 , 2002 .

[15]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Usability Engineering in Practice , 2002 .

[16]  Antoine Gagneux,et al.  Quality Approach of Web Documents by an Evaluation of Structure Relevance , 2001 .

[17]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual motion and attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  N. Moray Attention in Dichotic Listening: Affective Cues and the Influence of Instructions , 1959 .

[19]  Neville Drasdo,et al.  VISION RESEARCH: A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO LABORATORY METHODS. , 1999 .

[20]  Pablo Romero,et al.  Visual Attention and Representation Switching During Java Program Debugging: A Study Using the Restricted Focus Viewer , 2002, Diagrams.

[21]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Eye tracking the visual search of click-down menus , 1999, CHI '99.

[22]  Robert W. Reeder,et al.  Information scent as a driver of Web behavior graphs: results of a protocol analysis method for Web usability , 2001, CHI.

[23]  G. H. BYFORD Eye Movement Recording , 1959, Nature.

[24]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Eye tracking in web search tasks: design implications , 2002, ETRA.

[27]  Gregory A. Miller,et al.  Selective processing of superimposed objects: an electrophysiological analysis of object-based attentional selection , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[28]  Laurence R. Harris,et al.  Vision and Attention , 2001 .

[29]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  John Robson,et al.  Vision research : a practical guide to laboratory methods , 1998 .

[31]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Visual information foraging in a focus + context visualization , 2001, CHI.

[33]  Jeffrey J. Hendrickson,et al.  Performance, preference, and visual scan patterns on a menu-based system: implications for interface design , 1989, CHI '89.

[34]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Peter Faraday Attending to web pages , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[37]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Usability Engineering: Scenario-based Development of Human-Computer Interaction , 2001 .

[39]  P. McCormick Orienting attention without awareness. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Koichi Oda,et al.  Moving window generator for reading experiments , 1994 .