Biomechanical characterisation of fresh and cadaverous human small intestine: applications for abdominal trauma

Intestinal injuries are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality arising from trauma to the abdomen. The biomechanical characterisation of the small intestine allows for the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for these injuries. Studies reported in the literature focus principally on quasi-static tests, which do not take into account the stresses experienced during high kinetic trauma. In addition, the use of embalmed human tissue can alter the recorded response. The stress–strain curves from 43 tensile tests performed at 1 m/s were analysed. Samples were prepared from four fresh human intestines and from four embalmed cadaveric intestines. The data indicated a two-phase response, with each response consisting of a quasi-linear increase in the stress followed by an inflection in the curve before a peak preceding the loss of stress. The fresh tissue was more deformable than the embalmed tissue, and its first peak stress was lower (P = 0.034). A complementary histological analysis was performed. The results of the analysis enable an investigation of the response of the intestinal wall layers to stress as a two-layer structure and highlight the high sensitivity of the structure’s mechanical behaviour to the speed of loading and the method of preservation.

[1]  Suvranu De,et al.  An efficient soft tissue characterization algorithm from in vivo indentation experiments for medical simulation , 2008, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[2]  V. Egorov,et al.  Mechanical properties of the human gastrointestinal tract. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  T. Yambe,et al.  Passive mechanical properties of large intestine under in vivo and in vitro compression. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  G. Vekinis,et al.  Influence of growth factors erythropoietin and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor on mechanical strength and healing of colonic anastomoses in rats. , 1999, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[5]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Strength of biological materials , 1970 .

[6]  B. Hannaford,et al.  In-vivo and in-situ compressive properties of porcine abdominal soft tissues. , 2003, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[7]  C. Gao,et al.  Biomechanical and morphological properties in rat large intestine. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  E. Pan,et al.  Measurement of mechanical properties of rectal wall , 2005, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[9]  Pierre-Jean Arnoux,et al.  Inverse analysis and robustness evaluation for biological structure behaviour in FE simulation: application to the liver , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[10]  K H Yang,et al.  Development of a finite element model of the human abdomen. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[11]  H. Gregersen,et al.  Geometric and mechanosensory properties of the sigmoid colon evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society.

[12]  Daniel B. Jones,et al.  In situ measurement and modeling of biomechanical response of human cadaveric soft tissues for physics-based surgical simulation , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  Georges Winckler,et al.  Manuel d'anatomie topographique et fonctionnelle , 1974 .

[14]  A N Smith,et al.  Mechanical properties of the rat colon: the effect of age, sex and different conditions of storage. , 1985, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology.

[15]  J. Forman,et al.  Human surrogates for injury biomechanics research , 2011, Clinical anatomy.

[16]  N. Cheynel,et al.  Integration of liver behaviour in FE simulation , 2009 .

[17]  Giorgio Gabella,et al.  The cross-ply arrangement of collagen fibres in the submucosa of the mammalian small intestine , 1987, Cell and Tissue Research.

[18]  A N Smith,et al.  Mechanical properties of the colon: comparison of the features of the African and European colon in vitro. , 1985, Gut.

[19]  Alfred Cuschieri,et al.  Measurements and modelling of the compliance of human and porcine organs , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  T. M. Hughes,et al.  The pathophysiology and management of bowel and mesenteric injuries due to blunt trauma. , 2002, Injury.

[21]  S. Fakhry,et al.  Incidence of hollow viscus injury in blunt trauma: an analysis from 275,557 trauma admissions from the East multi-institutional trial. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[22]  A. Heimdal,et al.  Mechanical properties in the human gastric antrum using B-mode ultrasonography and antral distension. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.

[23]  D C Viano,et al.  Biomechanics of the human chest, abdomen, and pelvis in lateral impact. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Use of postmortem human subjects to describe injury responses and tolerances , 2011, Clinical anatomy.

[25]  Samir M Fakhry,et al.  Current diagnostic approaches lack sensitivity in the diagnosis of perforated blunt small bowel injury: analysis from 275,557 trauma admissions from the EAST multi-institutional HVI trial. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.