My pipes say I am powerful: belonging and class as constructed through our sewers

This review examines the social and political roots and ongoing implications of centralized, waterborne sewerage. This system has served as a marker of class, a signal of wealth and political power, and a mechanism of social reform. As sewerage networks ballooned in the mid-19th century throughout Europe and North America in response to a growing public health movement, their use and attendant hygiene practices served to intertwine physical and moral hygiene. The new infrastructure prioritized a felt distance between the user and their excreta, particularly signaled by the absence of odor, access to privacy, and the disassociation of users from any part of the management process beyond the flush of the toilet. Furthermore, the resource intensive system advertised affluence, and emphasized emerging notions of the networked urban space, which had the potential to tame and control Nature. This infrastructure model and its social and political underpinnings were exported to many cities under colonial influence throughout much of the 19th and 20th centuries, and were used to justify class differentiation and racialized agendas. Differential sewerage access in municipal centers of the Global South today continues to serve as a marker of class distinction, and many modern scholars explore how lack of sewerage renders the urban poor politically invisible. Ultimately, consideration of the social and political legacy of the linear sewerage system may offer new ways forward in addressing urban sanitation crises faced across the globe today, including problems posed by aging, unsustainable, and insufficient infrastructure. WIREs Water 2016, 3:63–73. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1108 This article is categorized under: Human Water > Value of Water

[1]  C Hamlin,et al.  Edwin Chadwick and the Engineers, 1842—1854: Systems and Antisystems in the Pipe-and-Brick Sewers War , 1992, Technology and culture.

[2]  Colin Mcfarlane Governing the Contaminated City: Infrastructure and Sanitation in Colonial and Post-Colonial Bombay , 2008 .

[3]  B. Agarwal,et al.  Participatory Exclusions, Community Forestry, and Gender: An Analysis for South Asia and a Conceptual Framework , 2001 .

[4]  Leila M. Harris,et al.  Citizenshit: The Right to Flush and the Urban Sanitation Imaginary , 2014 .

[5]  W. Anderson Excremental Colonialism: Public Health and the Poetics of Pollution , 1995, Critical Inquiry.

[6]  G. Öberg,et al.  The notion of sewage as waste: a study of infrastructure change and institutional inertia in Buenos Aires, Argentina and Vancouver, Canada , 2014 .

[7]  A. Roy Civic Governmentality: The Politics of Inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai , 2009 .

[8]  O. Obianwu Getting Real with Youth-Friendly Services in Africa: Report of a satellite session at the 2012 International HIV/AIDS Conference. , 2012, African journal of reproductive health.

[9]  M. Gandy Rethinking urban metabolism: water, space and the modern city , 2004 .

[10]  Jonathan Rutherford,et al.  Symposium on Political Infrastructures : governing and experiencing the fabric of the city , 2008 .

[11]  J. Sundberg ‘Trash-talk’ and the production of quotidian geopolitical boundaries in the USA–Mexico borderlands , 2008 .

[12]  Colin McFarlane,et al.  Sanitation in Mumbai's Informal Settlements: State, ‘Slum’, and Infrastructure , 2008 .

[13]  Adam Pine The Performativity of Urban Citizenship , 2010 .

[14]  S. Burn,et al.  A pathway to a more sustainable water sector: sustainability-based asset management. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[15]  M. Tanner,et al.  Interconnected Slums: Water, Sanitation and Health in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire , 2006 .

[16]  Leila M. Harris Gender and emergent water governance: comparative overview of neoliberalized natures and gender dimensions of privatization, devolution and marketization , 2009 .

[17]  A. Appadurai Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics , 2001 .

[18]  Mary Galvin,et al.  Talking shit: is Community‐Led Total Sanitation a radical and revolutionary approach to sanitation? , 2015 .

[19]  D. Watson,et al.  The Sociology of Odors , 1972, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Leila M. Harris Modernizing the nation: Postcolonialism, postdevelopmentalism, and ambivalent spaces of difference in southeastern Turkey , 2008 .

[21]  S. van der Geest,et al.  Akan shit: getting rid of dirt in Ghana , 1998 .

[22]  Sharon Zukin,et al.  From Coney Island to Las Vegas in the Urban Imaginary , 1998 .

[23]  M. Gandy Planning, Anti-planning and the Infrastructure Crisis Facing Metropolitan Lagos , 2006 .

[24]  Maria Kaika,et al.  Fetishising the Modern City: the Phantasmagoria of Urban Technological Networks , 2000 .

[25]  Steve Graham,et al.  Informal Urban Sanitation: Everyday Life, Poverty, and Comparison , 2014 .

[26]  S. Craddock Sewers and scapegoats: spatial metaphors of smallpox in nineteenth century San Francisco. , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[27]  Barbara Penner,et al.  Flush with Inequality: Sanitation in South Africa , 2010 .

[28]  Thomas P. Curtis,et al.  Pro-poor sanitation technologies , 2007 .

[29]  M. Cope,et al.  Empowering women's citizenship , 1994 .

[30]  Barbara Evans,et al.  Commentary on community-led total sanitation and human rights: should the right to community-wide health be won at the cost of individual rights? , 2012, Journal of water and health.

[31]  M. Gandy Landscapes of Disaster: Water, Modernity, and Urban Fragmentation in Mumbai , 2008 .

[32]  Matthew Gandy,et al.  The Paris Sewers and the Rationalization of Urban Space , 1999 .

[33]  Sarah Jewitt,et al.  Geographies of shit , 2011 .

[34]  S. Marston,et al.  Citizenship, Struggle, and Political and Economic Restructuring , 1994 .

[35]  Guenter Langergraber,et al.  Ecological Sanitation--a way to solve global sanitation problems? , 2005, Environment international.

[36]  F. Cunningham The virtues of urban citizenship , 2011 .