A proposed approach for setup time reduction through integrating conventional SMED method with multiple criteria decision-making techniques

Short setup time is an essential element for the effective implementation of many lean pillars, i.e., JIT, and Kanban. Most of the current setup reduction methodologies are based on Shingo's Single Minute Exchange of Dies (SMED) that suggests the conversion of internal setup operations to external operations. However, the conventional SMED approach - as proposed by Shingo - does not possess a systematic approach to accomplish this conversion. Thus, a new approach is proposed in order to aid the process engineers in implementing SMED. The proposed approach is based on the conventional SMED, but also it incorporates Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Techniques (MCDM) to the third implementation phase. The MCDM techniques used in this work are Analytical Hierarchal Process (AHP), Preference Selection Index (PSI) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The proposed approach provides a systematic procedure for selecting the best setup technique among the available alternatives, and takes also into consideration other factors that affect the decision-making process; including: cost, energy, facility layout, safety, life, quality and maintenance. A real example of PVC industry is used to exemplify the approach. The results demonstrate the capability of the proposed approach in setup time reduction, which in turn will improve machines' utilization, and increase the productivity and flexibility of the whole facility.

[1]  Ali Shanian,et al.  TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell , 2006 .

[2]  Alexandra Tenera Improving SMED in the Automotive Industry: A case study , 2009 .

[3]  Elizabeth A. Cudney,et al.  Model Development of a Virtual Learning Environment to Enhance Lean Education , 2011, Complex Adaptive Systems.

[4]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[5]  Ibrahim A. Baky,et al.  TOPSIS for bi-level MODM problems , 2013 .

[6]  Carmen Maxim,et al.  Leveraging new SEMI standard to reduce waste and improve flow for semicoductor manufacturing , 2010 .

[7]  Shi-Chung Chang,et al.  Scheduling flexible flow shops with sequence-dependent setup effects , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[8]  Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman,et al.  INTEGRATION OF SMED AND TRIZ IN IMPROVING PRODUCTIVITY AT SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY , 2011 .

[9]  Anand Nair,et al.  Relationship between just-in-time manufacturing practices and performance: A meta-analytic investigation , 2010 .

[10]  Berna Ulutas,et al.  An Application of SMED Methodology , 2011 .

[11]  S. Syath Abuthakeer,et al.  Implementation of Lean Tools and Techniques in an Automotive Industry , 2012 .

[12]  Serkan Yavuz,et al.  Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  新郷 重夫,et al.  A study of the Toyota production system from an industrial engineering viewpoint , 1989 .

[14]  K. Maniya,et al.  A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method , 2010 .

[15]  Steve J. Culley,et al.  Changeover Improvement: Reinterpreting Shingo's “SMED” Methodology , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[16]  R. Bohn,et al.  Setup Time Reduction for Electronics Assembly: Combining Simple (SMED) and IT‐Based Methods , 2005 .

[17]  Tarek Al-Hawari,et al.  Selection of Temperature Measuring Sensors Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2011 .

[18]  Chin-Tsai Lin,et al.  An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for selecting the best slicing machine , 2007, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[19]  Marko Starbek,et al.  Reduction of Machine Setup Time , 2010 .

[20]  新郷 重夫,et al.  A revolution in manufacturing : the SMED system , 1985 .

[21]  Ali Allahverdi,et al.  The significance of reducing setup times/setup costs , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Leonardo Rivera,et al.  Measuring the impact of Lean tools on the cost-time investment of a product using cost-time profiles , 2007 .

[23]  William G. Sullivan,et al.  EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DECISIONS AND LEAN MANUFACTURING , 2002 .

[24]  Yusuf Tansel İç,et al.  An experimental design approach using TOPSIS method for the selection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies , 2012 .

[25]  Ahmad Rasdan Ismail,et al.  Setup Time Reduction in an Automotive Battery Assembly Line , 2013 .

[26]  M. G. Bhatt,et al.  An alternative multiple attribute decision making methodology for solving optimal facility layout design selection problems , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[27]  A. Moreira,et al.  Single Minute Exchange of Die. A Case Study Implementation , 2011 .

[28]  Hendrik Van Landeghem,et al.  Rules for integrating fast changeover capabilities into new equipment design , 2002 .

[29]  J. Arnaldo,et al.  A COMPILATION OF COMPARISONS ON THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS AND OTHERS MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: SOME CASES DEVELOPED IN BRAZIL , 2001 .

[30]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Agility and production flow layouts: An analytical decision analysis , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[31]  W. J. Chen Scheduling with dependent setups and maintenance in a textile company , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[32]  Appa Iyer Sivakumar,et al.  Criteria selection and analysis for single machine dynamic on-line scheduling with multiple objectives and sequence-dependent setups , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[33]  Vincent F. Yu,et al.  An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria approach for the performance evaluation of multiple manufacturing plants , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[34]  Ashok Arora,et al.  RECONFIGURABLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEM: AN OVERVIEW , 2009 .

[35]  Dirk Van Goubergen Set-up Reduction for Lean Cells and Multi-Machine Situations , 2006, APMS.

[36]  T. Melton,et al.  The Benefits of Lean Manufacturing: What Lean Thinking has to Offer the Process Industries , 2005 .

[37]  Tamer Eren,et al.  A bicriteria flowshop scheduling problem with setup times , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[38]  Sandeep Grover,et al.  Application of preference selection index method for decision making over the design stage of production system life cycle , 2015 .

[39]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[40]  R. Khorshidi,et al.  Selection of an optimal refinement condition to achieve maximum tensile properties of Al–15%Mg2Si composite based on TOPSIS method , 2013 .

[41]  Faris M. AL-Oqla,et al.  Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Multi- Criteria Analysis of the Selection of Cranes , 2010 .

[42]  S. Seshadri,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on “Risk Management in Operations” , 2009 .