Inverse analysis of constitutive models: biological soft tissues.

The paper describes a procedure for estimating the material parameters of biological soft tissue by fitting model prediction to experimental load-deformation data. This procedure minimizes the error between data and theoretical model prediction through systematically adjusting the parameters in the latter. The procedure uses commercially available software and is not specific to any particular model; nevertheless, for illustration purposes, we employ a six parameter fibril-reinforced poroelastic cartilage model. We are able to estimate any and all of these parameters by the procedure. Convergence of the parameters and convergence of the arbitrary initial stress relaxation to the data was demonstrated in all cases. Though we illustrate the optimization procedure here for unconfined compression only, it can be adapted easily to other experimental configurations such as confined compression, indentation and tensile test. Furthermore, the procedure can be applied in other areas of biomechanics where material parameters need to be extracted from experimental data.

[1]  R. Tyrrell Rockafellar,et al.  Lagrange Multipliers and Optimality , 1993, SIAM Rev..

[2]  C. M. Agrawal,et al.  Intraspecies and Interspecies Comparison of the Compressive Properties of the Medial Meniscus , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  V. Mow,et al.  Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Poroelastic creep response analysis of a lumbar motion segment in compression. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  A F Mak,et al.  The apparent viscoelastic behavior of articular cartilage--the contributions from the intrinsic matrix viscoelasticity and interstitial fluid flows. , 1986, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  A fibril-network-reinforced biphasic model of cartilage in unconfined compression. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  J P Laible,et al.  A dynamic material parameter estimation procedure for soft tissue using a poroelastic finite element model. , 1994, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[8]  V C Mow,et al.  Finite deformation biphasic material properties of bovine articular cartilage from confined compression experiments. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Kyriacos A. Athanasiou,et al.  Erratum: Biomechanical properties of hip cartilage in experimental animal models (Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1995) 316 (254-266)) , 1995 .

[10]  R. Spilker,et al.  Indentation analysis of biphasic articular cartilage: nonlinear phenomena under finite deformation. , 1994, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  E B Hunziker,et al.  Importance of the superficial tissue layer for the indentation stiffness of articular cartilage. , 2002, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  Gerard A Ateshian,et al.  Experimental verification of the roles of intrinsic matrix viscoelasticity and tension-compression nonlinearity in the biphasic response of cartilage. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  F. J. Dzida,et al.  Biomechanical Properties of Hip Cartilage in Experimental Animal Models , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  V. Mow,et al.  A transversely isotropic biphasic model for unconfined compression of growth plate and chondroepiphysis. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  A Oloyede,et al.  Is classical consolidation theory applicable to articular cartilage deformation? , 1991, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of cartilage in unconfined ramp compression using a fibril reinforced poroelastic model. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.