Temporal frequency response characteristic of motion channels measured with three different psychophysical techniques

The temporal frequency response characteristic of motion-sensitive channels in human vision was studied with three different psychophysical techniques: (a) measurements of threshold flicker sensitivity to drifting sinusoidal gratings; (b) measurements of the amount of contrast possessed by one sinusoidal component of a composite adapting stimulus when it just hulled the motion aftereffect produced by a second reference component drifting in the opposite direction; and (c) measurements of velocity difference thresholds. The threshold flicker measurements la) and null contrast measurements (b) corresponded exactly throughout the entire range of temporal frequencies studied as long as the velocity of the reference component in the null contrast method was not too fast. The correspondence means that the two types of measurements very likely have a common substrate comprised of directionally selective channels. The correspondence is also interesting in that one set of measurements (a) was obtained at threshold levels, whereas the second set of measurements (b) was obtained at suprathreshold levels. At high temporal frequencies, the function describing velocity dilierence thresholds departs from that which describes the other two types of measurements, suggesting that velocity discriminations at high temporal frequencies depend upon different cues or motion channels.

[1]  N. Sutherland Figural After-Effects and Apparent Size , 1961 .

[2]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Aftereffect of Seen Motion with a Stabilized Retinal Image , 1963, Science.

[3]  A Pantle,et al.  Flicker adaptation. I. Effect on visual sensitivity to temporal fluctuations of light intensity. , 1971, Vision research.

[4]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  H. Barlow,et al.  Evidence for a Physiological Explanation of the Waterfall Phenomenon and Figural After-effects , 1963, Nature.

[6]  U. T. Keesey Flicker and pattern detection: a comparison of thresholds. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  R. Sekuler,et al.  The independence of channels in human vision selective for direction of movement. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  J. M. Notterman,et al.  Weber's Law and the Difference Threshold for the Velocity of a Seen Object , 1957, Science.

[9]  B G Breitmeyer,et al.  Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. , 1976, Psychological review.

[10]  W. E. Hick The Threshold for Sudden Changes in the Velocity of a Seen Object , 1950, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  P. Gouras Identification of cone mechanisms in monkey ganglion cells , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  D. Tolhurst Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and the movement of a moving visual stimulus , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  A Pantle,et al.  On the Capacity of Directionally Selective Mechanisms to Encode Different Dimensions of Moving Stimuli , 1978, Perception.

[15]  R. Woodworth,et al.  Woodworth & Schlosberg's Experimental psychology , 1972 .