Incentives to Manipulate Demand Response Baselines With Uncertain Event Schedules

We study baseline-based demand response (DR) programs. In such programs, customers get rebates based on how much they reduce electricity consumption during DR events relative to a “baseline,” where this baseline is determined by their consumption during previous non-event days. Customers, or automated controls working on their behalf, can achieve higher DR payments by decreasing consumption during DR events (desired behavior), and by increasing consumption during non-event times (baseline manipulation). Importantly, the customers have imperfect knowledge of when future demand response events will occur. To understand customers’ incentives for baseline manipulation, we present a novel multi-stage stochastic dynamic programming model that optimizes customer actions for maximum expected rewards under uncertain event schedules. Analytical results for special cases show fundamental drivers of customer incentives. Simulation results reveal incentives to manipulate baselines and impacts to program performance for a realistic baseline-based demand response program, and how program and customer parameters affect incentives.

[1]  Fredy Ruiz,et al.  A novel incentive-based demand response model for Cournot competition in electricity markets , 2018, Energy Systems.

[2]  Vincent W. S. Wong,et al.  Advanced Demand Side Management for the Future Smart Grid Using Mechanism Design , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[3]  Na Li,et al.  Demand Response With Capacity Constrained Supply Function Bidding , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Leslie Aldridge,et al.  Money for nothing. , 2002, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[5]  Fredy Ruiz,et al.  Rational consumer decisions in a peak time rebate program , 2017, ArXiv.

[6]  Christos V. Verikoukis,et al.  A Survey on Demand Response Programs in Smart Grids: Pricing Methods and Optimization Algorithms , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[7]  Eilyan Bitar,et al.  Risk-Sensitive Learning and Pricing for Demand Response , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[8]  F. Wolak Residential Customer Response to Real-time Pricing: The Anaheim Critical Peak Pricing Experiment , 2007 .

[9]  Yuanzhang Xiao,et al.  Customer Incentives for Gaming Demand Response Baselines , 2019, 2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[10]  Giambattista Gruosso,et al.  Limiting gaming opportunities on incentive-based demand response programs , 2018, Applied Energy.

[11]  Vijay Gupta,et al.  A Contract Design Approach for Phantom Demand Response , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  Kameshwar Poolla,et al.  A Minimal Incentive-Based Demand Response Program With Self Reported Baseline Mechanism , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[13]  Na Li,et al.  Optimal demand response based on utility maximization in power networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[14]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  Mechanism Design for Demand Response Programs , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[15]  Vincent W. S. Wong,et al.  Autonomous Demand-Side Management Based on Game-Theoretic Energy Consumption Scheduling for the Future Smart Grid , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[16]  Zita Vale,et al.  Consumers performance evaluation of the participation in demand response programs using baseline methods , 2013, 2013 IEEE Grenoble Conference.