Techniques for virtual lung nodule insertion: volumetric and morphometric comparison of projection-based and image-based methods for quantitative CT.

Virtual nodule insertion paves the way towards the development of standardized databases of hybrid CT images with known lesions. The purpose of this study was to assess three methods (an established and two newly developed techniques) for inserting virtual lung nodules into CT images. Assessment was done by comparing virtual nodule volume and shape to the CT-derived volume and shape of synthetic nodules. 24 synthetic nodules (three sizes, four morphologies, two repeats) were physically inserted into the lung cavity of an anthropomorphic chest phantom (KYOTO KAGAKU). The phantom was imaged with and without nodules on a commercial CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition Flash, Siemens) using a standard thoracic CT protocol at two dose levels (1.4 and 22 mGy CTDIvol). Raw projection data were saved and reconstructed with filtered back-projection and sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE, strength 5) at 0.6 mm slice thickness. Corresponding 3D idealized, virtual nodule models were co-registered with the CT images to determine each nodule's location and orientation. Virtual nodules were voxelized, partial volume corrected, and inserted into nodule-free CT data (accounting for system imaging physics) using two methods: projection-based Technique A, and image-based Technique B. Also a third Technique C based on cropping a region of interest from the acquired image of the real nodule and blending it into the nodule-free image was tested. Nodule volumes were measured using a commercial segmentation tool (iNtuition, TeraRecon, Inc.) and deformation was assessed using the Hausdorff distance. Nodule volumes and deformations were compared between the idealized, CT-derived and virtual nodules using a linear mixed effects regression model which utilized the mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] of the regional Hausdorff distance. Overall, there was a close concordance between the volumes of the CT-derived and virtual nodules. Percent differences between them were less than 3% for all insertion techniques and were not statistically significant in most cases. Correlation coefficient values were greater than 0.97. The deformation according to the Hausdorff distance was also similar between the CT-derived and virtual nodules with minimal statistical significance in the ([Formula: see text]) for Techniques A, B, and C. This study shows that both projection-based and image-based nodule insertion techniques yield realistic nodule renderings with statistical similarity to the synthetic nodules with respect to nodule volume and deformation. These techniques could be used to create a database of hybrid CT images containing nodules of known size, location and morphology.

[1]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  J. Solomon,et al.  Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability. , 2015, Medical physics.

[3]  P. V. van Ooijen,et al.  Small irregular pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: observer detection sensitivity and volumetry accuracy. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  A multi-resolution technique for comparing images using the Hausdorff distance , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[5]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Lesion insertion in projection domain for computed tomography image quality assessment , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Evaluating variability in tumor measurements from same-day repeat CT scans of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. , 2009, Radiology.

[7]  Chi Wan Koo,et al.  Evaluation of a projection-domain lung nodule insertion technique in thoracic CT , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Lesion insertion in the projection domain: Methods and initial results. , 2015, Medical physics.

[9]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Seamless Lesion Insertion for Data Augmentation in CAD Training , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  A methodology for image quality evaluation of advanced CT systems. , 2013, Medical physics.

[11]  B. Ginneken,et al.  A comparison of six software packages for evaluation of solid lung nodules using semi-automated volumetry: What is the minimum increase in size to detect growth in repeated CT examinations , 2009, European Radiology.

[12]  M. Robins,et al.  Volumetric quantification of lung nodules in CT with iterative reconstruction (ASiR and MBIR). , 2013, Medical physics.

[13]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[14]  Patrick Pérez,et al.  Poisson image editing , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[15]  Rozemarijn Vliegenthart,et al.  Sensitivity and accuracy of volumetry of pulmonary nodules on low-dose 16- and 64-row multi-detector CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study , 2012, European Radiology.

[16]  P. Joseph.  An Improved Algorithm for Reprojecting Rays through Pixel Images , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  P M A van Ooijen,et al.  Inter- and intrascanner variability of pulmonary nodule volumetry on low-dose 64-row CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study. , 2013, The British journal of radiology.

[18]  M. McNitt-Gray,et al.  Variability in CT lung-nodule volumetry: Effects of dose reduction and reconstruction methods. , 2015, Medical physics.

[19]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  MESH: measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[20]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  A generic framework to simulate realistic lung, liver and renal pathologies in CT imaging , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  J. Gore.  Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers and their Emerging Role , 2013 .

[22]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Noncalcified lung nodules: volumetric assessment with thoracic CT. , 2009, Radiology.

[23]  Martin Tall,et al.  Characterizing search, recognition, and decision in the detection of lung nodules on CT scans: elucidation with eye tracking. , 2015, Radiology.

[24]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Quantitative CT: technique dependence of volume estimation on pulmonary nodules , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Seamless lesion insertion for data augmentation in CAD training. , 2016, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[26]  Jingyan Xu,et al.  Task-based image quality evaluation of iterative reconstruction methods for low dose CT using computer simulations , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Pediatric MDCT: towards assessing the diagnostic influence of dose reduction on the detection of small lung nodules. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[28]  Mithat Gönen,et al.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers: A review of statistical methods for technical performance assessment , 2015, Statistical methods in medical research.

[29]  N. Petrick,et al.  Volume estimation of low-contrast lesions with CT: a comparison of performances from a phantom study, simulations and theoretical analysis , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  M. Christian,et al.  [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors]. , 2000, Bulletin du cancer.

[31]  Rongping Zeng,et al.  Seamless Insertion of Pulmonary Nodules in Chest CT Images , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  H. Barnhart,et al.  The emerging science of quantitative imaging biomarkers terminology and definitions for scientific studies and regulatory submissions , 2015, Statistical methods in medical research.