Economies of Scale, Scope, and Density in the Italian Water Sector: A Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Approach

Public utilities could improve their efficiency by pursuing specific strategies, such as growth, diversification of investments, or serving mainly high densely areas. For example, in the water sector, economies of scope and scale both appear possible, but extant literature does not offer clear or consensual findings. To address this lack of clarity, this article investigates the potential for efficiency improvement in the diverse Italian water sector, which comprises utilities of various sizes, operating in areas with various population densities and organized as mono- or multi-utilities. Technical and financial data from 64 different utilities were collected and then analyzed with a two-stage data envelopment analysis approach to reveal the impacts of different operational and exogenous variables on efficiency, including firm size, the degree of investment diversification, and customer density. The results obtained confirm the existence of all three types of economies (scale, scope and density), albeit with different impacts for each DEA score.

[1]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Resource-Use Efficiency in Public Schools: A Study of Connecticut Data , 1991 .

[2]  Kenneth R. Stanton.  Trends in relationship lending and factors affecting relationship lending efficiency , 2002 .

[3]  Takuya Urakami,et al.  Identifying network density and scale economies for Japanese water supply organizations , 2001 .

[4]  S. Grosskopf,et al.  Efficiency and Ownership: Further Evidence , 1986 .

[5]  William F. Fox,et al.  Using Homothetic Composed Error Frontiers to Measure Water Utility Efficiency , 1986 .

[6]  Alan M. Sear,et al.  Technical efficiency and the competitive behavior of hospitals , 1994 .

[7]  Giovanni Fraquelli,et al.  Costs and Structure of Technology in the Italian Water Industry , 2000 .

[8]  David Saal.  Investigation into evidence for economies of scale in the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: final report , 2004 .

[9]  Robert M. Clark,et al.  Economies of scale and scope in water supply , 1988 .

[10]  Francisco José González Gómez,et al.  Efficiency in the management of urban water services. What have we learned after four decades of research , 2008 .

[11]  Rui Cunha Marques,et al.  The influence of the operational environment on the efficiency of water utilities. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  Antonio Massarutto,et al.  Private management and public finance in the Italian water industry: A marriage of convenience? , 2008 .

[13]  Steven Renzetti,et al.  Municipal Water Supply and Sewage Treatment: Costs, Prices and Distortions , 1999 .

[14]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[15]  Alban Thomas,et al.  The Structure of Municipal Water Supply Costs: Application to a Panel of French Local Communities , 2001 .

[16]  Giovanni Fraquelli,et al.  Reforming the wastewater treatment sector in Italy: Implications of plant size, structure, and scale economies , 2003 .

[17]  R. Marques,et al.  Is big better? On scale and scope economies in the Portuguese water sector , 2011 .

[18]  D. Clark.  Public service reform: A comparative west European perspective , 2000 .

[19]  G. Grossi,et al.  Do ownership and size affect the performance of water utilities? Evidence from Estonian municipalities , 2013 .

[20]  Antonio Estache,et al.  Sector Organization, Governance, and the Inefficiency of African Water Utilities , 2002 .

[21]  B. Golany,et al.  Using rank statistics for determining programmatic efficiency differences in data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[22]  Rui Cunha Marques,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Designing performance incentives , an international benchmark study in the water sector , 2010 .

[23]  Rita Martins,et al.  Cost Structure of the Portuguese Water Industry: a Cubic Cost Function Application , 2006 .

[24]  Takuya Urakami.  Economies of vertical integration in the Japanese water supply industry , 2006 .

[25]  Bettina Campedelli,et al.  Factors affecting the performance of water utility companies , 2011 .

[26]  Lester C. Hunt,et al.  Privatisation and Efficiency in the UK Water Industry: An Empirical Analysis , 2009 .

[27]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[28]  Stephen P. Osborne,et al.  The New Public Governance? 1 , 2006 .

[29]  John K. Ashton,et al.  Capital Utilisation and Scale in the English and Welsh Water Industry , 2003 .

[30]  Euijune Kim,et al.  SPATIAL INTEGRATION OF URBAN WATER SERVICES AND ECONOMIES OF SCALE , 1998 .

[31]  R. Marques,et al.  Viability of Municipal Companies in the Provision of Urban Infrastructure Services , 2011 .

[32]  C. Kirkpatrick,et al.  STATE VERSUS PRIVATE SECTOR PROVISION OF WATER SERVICES IN AFRICA: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS , 2004 .

[33]  Kathy J. Hayes.  Cost structure of the water utility industry , 1987 .

[34]  Andrea Baranzini,et al.  The Cost Structure of Water Utilities in Switzerland , 2009 .

[35]  Johannes Sauer,et al.  Economies of scale and firm size optimum in rural water supply , 2005 .

[36]  R. Willig,et al.  Economies of scope , 1981 .

[37]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  Cost efficiency of Slovenian water distribution utilities: an application of stochastic frontier methods , 2008 .

[38]  David S. Saal,et al.  Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985–2000 , 2007 .

[39]  M. Knapp,et al.  Economics of scale in sewage purification and disposal. , 1978, The Journal of industrial economics.

[40]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluating Water Supply Services in Japan with RAM: a Range-adjusted Measure of Inefficiency , 1998 .

[41]  Tim Coelli,et al.  A multi-stage methodology for the solution of orientated DEA models , 1998, Oper. Res. Lett..

[42]  Ayoe Hoff,et al.  Second stage DEA: Comparison of approaches for modelling the DEA score , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  Giulia Romano,et al.  Measuring and comparing the efficiency of water utility companies: A data envelopment analysis approach , 2011 .

[44]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Politicians and Firms , 1994 .

[45]  Arnaud Reynaud,et al.  Measuring Economies of Vertical Integration in Network Industries: An Application to the Water Sector , 2007 .

[46]  I. García‐Sánchez,et al.  Efficiency Measurement in Spanish Local Government: The Case of Municipal Water Services , 2006 .

[47]  H Youn Kim.  Economies of Scale in Multi-product Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1987 .

[48]  Marcelo Resende,et al.  Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: an empirical study , 2004 .

[49]  Bruce Cohen,et al.  Productivity and efficiency in the water industry , 2009 .

[50]  David Parker,et al.  State Versus Private Sector Provision of Water Services in Africa: a Statistical, DEA and Stochastic Cost Frontier Analysis , 2006 .

[51]  Thomas R. Sexton,et al.  Improving Pupil Transportation in North Carolina , 1994 .

[52]  Chandler Stolp,et al.  Strengths and weaknesses of data envelopment analysis : an urban and regional perspective , 1990 .

[53]  Rui Cunha Marques,et al.  Quantitative studies of water and sanitation utilities: a benchmarking literature survey , 2011 .

[54]  Diane P. Dupont,et al.  Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Municipal Water Suppliers: The Role of Environmental Factors , 2009, Land Economics.

[55]  Catherine J. Morrison Paul,et al.  Driving forces for consolidation or fragmentation of the US water utility industry: A cost function approach with endogenous output , 2006 .

[56]  E. Lynk,et al.  Privatisation, joint production and the comparative efficiencies of private and public ownership: the UK water industry case , 1993 .

[57]  C. Kirkpatrick,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of State and Private-Sector Provision of Water Services in Africa. , 2006 .

[58]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[59]  Rangesan Narayanan,et al.  Specification and estimation of the effect of ownership on the economic efficiency of the water utilities , 1995 .

[60]  A. Guerrini,et al.  Ownership, Investment Policies and Funding Choices of Italian Water Utilities: An Empirical Analysis , 2013, Water Resources Management.

[61]  David Parker,et al.  The impact of privatization and regulation on the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: a translog cost function model , 2000 .

[62]  Michael Zschille,et al.  The performance of German water utilities: a (semi)-parametric analysis , 2011 .

[63]  R. Marques,et al.  Big and beautiful? On non-parametrically measuring scale economies in non-convex technologies , 2011 .

[64]  Rui Cunha Marques,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of water utilities: a cross-national comparison between Portugal and Italy , 2012 .

[65]  R. Marques,et al.  Quantitative Studies of Water and Sanitation Utilities: A Literature Survey , 2010 .

[66]  Ehsan H. Feroz,et al.  Governance of the Water Supply Systems in the Palestinian Territories: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach to the Management of Water Resources , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[67]  C. Hood.  A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS , 1991 .

[68]  Rui Cunha Marques,et al.  Performance of Portuguese water utilities: how do ownership, size, diversification and vertical integration relate to efficiency? , 2011 .

[69]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[70]  Giovanni Fraquelli,et al.  Scope and scale economies in multi-utilities: evidence from gas, water and electricity combinations , 2004 .

[71]  J L Ford,et al.  Cost Functions for the Water Industry , 1969 .

[72]  John Cubbin,et al.  Regression versus data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement: an application to the England and Wales regulated water industry , 1998 .

[73]  Céline Nauges,et al.  Economies of density, scale and scope in the water supply and sewerage sector: a study of four developing and transition economies , 2008 .

[74]  Arnold Reisman,et al.  Data envelopment analysis literature: a bibliography update (1951–2001) , 2004 .

[75]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  The use of a variable cost function in the regulation of the Italian water industry , 2001 .

[76]  F. González‐Gómez,et al.  Outsourcing and Efficiency in the Management of Rural Water Services , 2013, Water Resources Management.

[77]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Performance of the Bootstrap for DEA Estimators and Iterating the Principle , 2011 .

[78]  Douglas W. Caves,et al.  Productivity Growth, Scale Economies, and Capacity Utilization in U.S. Railroads, 1955-74 , 1981 .

[79]  Winston Harrington,et al.  Economies of scale in community water systems , 2006 .

[80]  Rui Cunha Marques,et al.  A Meta-Regression Analysis of Benchmarking Studies on Water Utilities Market Structure , 2011 .

[81]  R. Grabowski,et al.  Technical, Scale, and Allocative Efficiencies in U.S. Banking: An Empirical Investigation , 1990 .

[82]  Brian Dollery,et al.  The relative economic efficiency of urban water utilities in regional New South Wales and Victoria , 2010 .

[83]  Teofilo Ozuna,et al.  Can public sector reforms improve the efficiency of public water utilities? , 2002, Environment and Development Economics.