Airline strategies for aircraft size and airline frequency with changing demand and competition: A simultaneous-equations approach for traffic on the north Atlantic

Airport planners need to know the forecast demand on the facilities provided airside at airports. For this they need to know how airlines will deal with traffic in terms of the size of aircraft and frequency of service. In response to increasing demand, airlines may increase capacity by increasing the frequency of flights or they may choose to increase aircraft size. This may yield operating cost economies. If the airports they operate from are capacity constrained they will be limited in the extent that they can change frequency that will limit their ability to compete with the number of frequencies offered. Consequently, these airports are excluded as are major hubs as frequencies will be influenced by connecting passengers. Routes are identified on the north Atlantic that can be analysed and conclusions are suggested on the basis of three stage least-squares estimates for pooled time series-cross section data. An increase in passengers on the whole will result in a larger increase in frequency than in aircraft size but the impact of competition does not yield significant results due to the strategy of excluding certain categories of airport.

[1]  Jan K. Brueckner,et al.  A MODEL OF SCHEDULING IN AIRLINE NETWORKS: HOW A HUB-AND-SPOKE SYSTEM AFFECTS FLIGHT FREQUENCY, FARES AND WELFARE , 2001 .

[2]  P. Rietveld,et al.  The environmental implications of airlines' choice of aircraft size , 2010 .

[3]  Milan Janic,et al.  LIBERALISATION OF EUROPEAN AVIATION: ANALYSIS AND MODELLING OF THE AIRLINE BEHAVIOUR , 1997 .

[4]  David A. Belsley Two- or three-stage least squares? , 1988 .

[5]  Mark Hansen,et al.  Impact of aircraft size and seat availability on airlines' demand and market share in duopoly markets , 2005 .

[6]  Keith J. Mason,et al.  Airframe manufacturers: Which has the better view of the future? , 2007 .

[7]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[8]  D. Pitfield,et al.  AIRLINE STRATEGIES FOR AIRCRAFT SIZE AND AIRLINE FREQUENCY WITH CHANGING DEMAND AND COMPETITION: A TWO-STAGE LEAST SQUARES ANALYSISFOR LONG HAUL TRAFFIC ON THE NORTH ATLANTIC , 2000 .

[9]  D. Pitfield Some Speculations and Empirical Evidence on the Oligopolistic Behaviour of Competing Low-Cost Airlines , 2005 .

[10]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Choice of Aircraft Size - Explanations and Implications , 2006 .

[11]  Kenneth Button,et al.  Recovering Costs by Increasing Market Share An Empirical Critique of the S-Curve , 2005 .

[12]  David Pitfield,et al.  Ryanair's Impact on Airline Market Share from the London Area Airports - a Time Series Analysis , 2007 .

[13]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[14]  J. B. Ramsey,et al.  Tests for Specification Errors in Classical Linear Least‐Squares Regression Analysis , 1969 .