A Case Study of Enabling Factors in the Technology Integration Change Process

The purpose of this qualitative case study was to analyze enabling factors in the technology integration change process in a multi-section science methods course, SCIED 408 (pseudonym), from 1997 to 2003 at a large northeastern university in the United States. We used two major data collection methods, in-depth interviewing and document reviews. We interviewed seven participants who played the role of change agents twice during the six-year period of time and examined documents related to integrating science specific technology in this multi-section course. The formation of a sustained, shared leadership team, the formation of a learning community, and the positive influences from educational systems emerged as three enabling factors to facilitate and sustain the technology integration change process. The interaction of the three factors also appeared to encourage greater capacity to deal with change.

[1]  Mark Windschitl,et al.  Supporting the development of science inquiry skills with special classes of software , 2000 .

[2]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[3]  B. Posner,et al.  Exploring the relationship between learning and leadership , 2001 .

[4]  Peter Senge,et al.  Recapturing the Spirit of Learning through a Systems Approach. , 1991 .

[5]  Gordon Rowland.  The Concept of Sustainability in the Evolutionary Guidance of an Educational Institution , 2004 .

[6]  Carol A. Mullen,et al.  The Original Ten: A Multisite Case Study of Florida's Millennium High School Reform Model. , 2002 .

[7]  Mary Annette Rose,et al.  Under Review: Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices for the New Millennium , 2002 .

[8]  Linda Lambert,et al.  A Framework for Shared Leadership. , 2002 .

[9]  W. Burke,et al.  A Causal Model of Organizational Performance and Change , 1992 .

[10]  A. Michael Huberman,et al.  An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis , 1994 .

[11]  Jeannette R. LaFors,et al.  Instructional Leadership for Systemic Change: The Story of San Diego's Reform , 2004 .

[12]  유창조.  Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[13]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Envisioning a New System of Education. , 1992 .

[14]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Systemic Change in Education , 1994 .

[15]  R. Yin.  Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[16]  Bela H. Banathy.  We enter the twenty‐first century with schooling designed in the nineteenth , 2001 .

[17]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  FIVE REASONS WHY THE “BIG FIVE” ARTICLE HAS BEEN FREQUENTLY CITED , 1998 .

[18]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[19]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  The Imperative for Systemic Change. , 1992 .

[20]  Valerie L. Talsma,et al.  Supporting excellence in technology through communities of learners , 2003 .

[21]  Dorothy Andrews,et al.  The experience of a professional community: teachers developing a new image of themselves and their workplace , 2002 .

[22]  Ken Brown.  Technology Funding: A How-To Guide--Key Factors to Keep in Mind When Building Your Technology Plan. , 2007 .

[23]  Catherine R. Nesbit,et al.  In Their Own Words: What Science and Mathematics Teacher Leaders Say Are Important Aspects of Professional Development. , 2001 .

[24]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Research for educational Communications and Technology , 1997 .

[25]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[26]  Claudia A. Balach,et al.  The Growth of a Professional Learning Community through Collaborative Action Research. , 2003 .

[27]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[28]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Technology and science education: Starting points, research programs, and trends , 2003 .

[29]  Susan Brooks-Young.  Going Corporate: Corporations Can Be a Great Source for Grant Funding. , 2007 .

[30]  Bela H. Banathy,et al.  Systems Design of Education: A Journey to Create the Future , 1991 .

[31]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject , 2001 .

[32]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Banathy's Influence on the Guidance System for Transforming Education , 2002 .

[33]  Krista Glazewski,et al.  Integrating technology in a field-based teacher training program: The PT3@ASU project , 2003 .

[34]  W. Bennis,et al.  Leaders: Strategies for Taking Charge , 1985 .