Developmental outcome of preterm infants with transient neuromotor abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE To determine the relationship between transiently abnormal neurologic findings in preterm infants and subsequent cognitive outcome at 4 years of age. DESIGN Prospective 4-year follow-up. SETTING Regional perinatal center in Syracuse, NY. PARTICIPANTS One hundred thirty-one of 135 consecutively born infants of no more than 32 weeks of gestational age; 98% followed up from birth to 4 years of age. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Based on neuromotor evaluations performed at 6 and 15 months of age, two groups of infants were identified. One group had abnormal neurologic findings at 6 months of age that had resolved by 15 months of age (transiently abnormal group). The other group had normal neuromotor findings at both 6 and 15 months of age (normal group). The transiently abnormal group had significantly poorer scores on the Bayley Mental scale at 6 months of age (90 +/- 15 vs 108 +/- 10; P < .001), 15 months (91 +/- 21 vs 105 +/- 12; P < .001), and 24 months (91 +/- 19 vs 101 +/- 17; P < .001). However, at 4 years of age, cognitive performance on the McCarthy Scales was similar for the transiently abnormal and normal groups (General Cognitive index, 93 +/- 13 and 95 +/- 14, respectively). The incidence of poor cognitive outcome (Cognitive index < 84) decreased from 39% at 2 years of age to 18% at 4 years of age in the group with a history of transient neurologic abnormalities but remained unchanged (16% to 18%) in the normal group. CONCLUSION Early neurologic abnormalities that are transient did not predict cognitive delays at 4 years of age in preterm infants.

[1]  R. Sauve,et al.  Early Indicators of Learning Problems in High-Risk Children , 1990, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[2]  S. Gross,et al.  Cingulate Sulcus Development in Preterm Infants , 1989, Pediatric Research.

[3]  N. Robinson,et al.  Transient Neurologic Signs in Infancy and Motor Outcomes at 4 1/2 Years in Children Born Biologically At Risk , 1988 .

[4]  P. Ellison.  Scoring sheet for the Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB). Suggestion from the field. , 1986, Physical therapy.

[5]  P. Ellison,et al.  Construction of an Infant Neurological International Battery (Infanib) for the assessment of neurological integrity in infancy. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[6]  A. Fanaroff,et al.  The very low birth weight infant: the broader spectrum of morbidity during infancy and early childhood. , 1983, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[7]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  Children who "outgrew' cerebral palsy. , 1982, Pediatrics.

[8]  Y. Burns,et al.  Minor neurological abnormalities during the first year of life in infants of birth weight <1500g , 1981 .

[9]  R. Rubin,et al.  Infant Neurological Abnormalities as Indicators of Cognitive Impairment , 1980, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[10]  C. Drillien,et al.  Low‐birthweight Children at Early School‐age: A Longitudinal Study , 1980, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[11]  M. Roulet,et al.  Psychological and neurodevelopmental outcome of high risk newborn infants. , 1976, Helvetica paediatrica acta.

[12]  C. Drillien.  Abnormal Neurologic Signs in the First Year of Life in Low‐birthweight Infants: Possible Prognostic Significance , 1972, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[13]  L M Dubowitz,et al.  Clinical assessment of gestational age in the newborn infant. , 1970, The Journal of pediatrics.

[14]  G. Solomons,et al.  The changing picture of cerebral dysfunction in early childhood. , 1963, The Journal of pediatrics.