Measuring the Social Value of Nuclear Energy Using Contingent Valuation Methodology

As one of the promising energy sources for the next few decades, nuclear energy receives more attention than before as environmental issues become more important and the supply of fossil fuels becomes unstable. One of the reasons for this attention is based on the rapid innovation of nuclear technology which solves many of its technological constraints and safety issues. However, regardless of these rapid innovations, social acceptance for nuclear energy has been relatively low and unchanged. Consequently, the social perception has often been an obstacle to the development and execution of nuclear policy requiring enormous subsidies which are not based on the social value of nuclear energy. Therefore, in this study, we estimate the social value of nuclear energy-consumers' willingness-to-pay for nuclear energy--using the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) and suggest that the social value of nuclear energy increases approximately 68.5% with the provision of adequate information about nuclear energy to the public. Consequently, we suggest that the social acceptance management in nuclear policy development is important along with nuclear technology innovation.

[1]  Mary Jo Kealy,et al.  Contingent Valuation of Environmental Assets: Comparison with a Stimulated Market , 1983 .

[2]  Young-Eal Lee Analysis on the Role of Various Power Generation Resources for the Sustainable Development of Korean Electric Industry , 2006 .

[3]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Chapter 17 Contingent Valuation , 2005 .

[4]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[5]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[6]  William D. Schulze,et al.  The marginal value of job safety: A contingent valuation study , 1988 .

[7]  Daniel L. Rubinfeld,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies : Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods , 1997 .

[8]  P. Shackley,et al.  The impact of information on non-health attributes on willingness to pay for multiple health care programmes. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[9]  J. Olsen,et al.  Theory versus practice: a review of 'willingness-to-pay' in health and health care. , 2001, Health economics.

[10]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Incentive and informational properties of preference questions , 2007 .

[11]  Wallace E. Tyner Policy Alternatives for the Future Biofuels Industry , 2007 .

[12]  A. Vatn Environmental Valuation and Rationality , 2004, Land Economics.

[13]  Soon-Heung Chang,et al.  An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Fuel Cycle Technologies for the National Energy Security Enhancement in the Electricity Sector , 2009 .

[14]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence , 2000 .

[15]  J. Stoll,et al.  Public Environmental Amenity Benefits of Private Land: The Case of Prime Agricultural Land , 1985, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[16]  Trine Bille Hansen,et al.  The Willingness-to-Pay for the Royal Theatre in Copenhagen as a Public Good , 1997 .

[17]  J. Knetsch Gains, Losses, and the US-EPA Economic Analyses Guidelines: A Hazardous Product? , 2005 .

[18]  C. Spash Non-Economic Motivation for Contingent Values: Rights and Attitudinal Beliefs in the Willingness To Pay for Environmental Improvements , 2006, Land Economics.

[19]  U. S. Doe A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems , 2002 .

[20]  Joel Darmstadter,et al.  Winner, Loser, or Innocent Victim? Has Renewable Energy Performed As Expected? , 2000 .

[21]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Consumer's Surplus Measures and the Evaluation of Resources , 1979 .

[22]  I. Bateman,et al.  Household willingness to pay and farmers' willingness to accept compensation for establishing a recreational woodland. , 1996 .

[23]  Andrew D. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material for: Ethanol Can Contribute To Energy and Environmental Goals , 2006 .

[24]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses , 1984 .

[25]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  Efficient Estimation Methods for "Closed-ended' Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1987 .