Biomimetics from practical feedback to an interdisciplinary process

Biomimetics has been a subject of increasing interest but, where it has proven its scientific relevance and innovative potential from a theoretical standpoint, it remains rarely used in practice. Facing this lack of implementation, our work aimed at asking practitioners for their help to better understand the remaining impediments preventing biomimetics’ blooming. Thus, practitioners’ feedback and experts’ opinion on risks, adequacy and weaknesses of the current biomimetic practices were gathered and structured to present an extensive descriptive phase on biomimetic processes. Key levers for improvements, such as the need for a better risk management, the need for biological expertise and the need for clear guidance during the process, were then identified. Based on these insights various methodological contributions are prescribed. Among these inputs, the duration of the various steps of the biomimetic process was estimated through industrial projects’ feedback, semantics misunderstandings were tackled, and the integration of a new transdisciplinary profile combining an expertise in both design and biology is proposed. From these improvements, a new version of the unified problem-driven biomimetic process is proposed. A final descriptive phase performed through the evaluation of the new process by professionals underlined its relevancy along with the remaining research axes. Through the integration of a new profile matching the practitioners’ current needs and the adaptation of the process to their feedback, this article aims at proposing a biomimetic process fitting the reality of biomimetic practice in order to support its implementation.

[1]  Joost R. Duflou,et al.  A scalable approach for ideation in biologically inspired design , 2014, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[2]  Jacquelyn K. S. Nagel,et al.  Establishing Analogy Categories for Bio-Inspired Design , 2018, Designs.

[3]  Jon-Michael Deldin,et al.  The AskNature Database: Enabling Solutions in Biomimetic Design , 2014 .

[4]  S. Keshwani and A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Influence of Analogical Domains and Abstraction Levels on Novelty of Designs , 2015 .

[5]  F V VincentJulian,et al.  The trade-off: a central concept for biomimetics , 2017 .

[6]  R. Cooper Design research – Its 50-year transformation , 2019, Design Studies.

[7]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Assessing design creativity , 2011 .

[8]  Yoram Reich,et al.  Biomimetic Design Method for Innovation and Sustainability , 2016 .

[9]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Information-Processing Theories of Biologically Inspired Design , 2014 .

[10]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  DANE: Fostering Creativity in and through Biologically Inspired Design , 2011 .

[11]  David Alvargonzález,et al.  Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Sciences , 2011 .

[12]  L. H. Shu,et al.  Automatic Extraction of Causally Related Functions From Natural-Language Text for Biomimetic Design , 2012 .

[13]  Richard Hyde,et al.  A model based on Biomimicry to enhance ecologically sustainable design , 2012 .

[14]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Adaptive Evolution of Teaching Practices in Biologically Inspired Design , 2014 .

[15]  Malcolm Alan Compitello In This Issue , 2010, Biological Psychiatry.

[16]  Nigel Cross,et al.  A History of Design Methodology , 1993 .

[17]  E. Snell-Rood,et al.  Interdisciplinarity: Bring biologists into biomimetics , 2016, Nature.

[18]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Biologically inspired design: process and products , 2009 .

[19]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  Influence of information and knowledge from biology on the variety of technical solution ideas , 2015 .

[20]  John Clarkson,et al.  Models of designing , 2005 .

[21]  Améziane Aoussat,et al.  Biomimetics: process, tools and practice , 2017, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[22]  Ioannis Konstas,et al.  Towards a Design Process for Computer-Aided Biomimetics , 2018, Biomimetics.

[23]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  The Four-Box Method of Problem Specification and Analogy Evaluation in Biologically Inspired Design , 2014 .

[24]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[25]  Jacquelyn K. S. Nagel,et al.  Facilitation method for the translation of biological systems to technical design solutions , 2018 .

[26]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design , 1990, AI Mag..

[27]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Biologically-Inspired Innovation in Engineering Design: a Cognitive Study , 2007 .

[28]  Nicolas Maranzana,et al.  Biomimetics and its tools , 2017 .

[29]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  ENGINEERING DESIGN USING BIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES , 2004 .

[30]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas , 2005, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[31]  Améziane Aoussat,et al.  The new product design ‐ a transverse approach , 2000 .

[32]  Robert L. Nagel,et al.  Abstracting biology for engineering design , 2011 .

[33]  Daniel A. McAdams,et al.  The Characterization of Biological Organization, Abstraction, and Novelty in Biomimetic Design , 2018, Designs.

[34]  Saeema Ahmed-Kristensen,et al.  NATURALLY ORIGINAL: STIMULATING CREATIVE DESIGN THROUGH BIOLOGICAL ANALOGIES AND RANDOM IMAGES , 2014 .

[35]  Usama Kadri,et al.  A methodology for the generation of biomimetic design concepts , 2015 .

[36]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Comparing novelty of designs from biological-inspiration with those from brainstorming , 2017 .

[37]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Compound Analogical Design: Interaction between Problem Decomposition and Analogical Transfer in Biologically Inspired Design , 2008 .

[38]  Améziane Aoussat,et al.  Engineers’ and Biologists’ Roles during Biomimetic Design Processes, Towards a Methodological Symbiosis , 2019, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design.

[39]  Ethan Smith,et al.  Growing the practice of biomimicry: opportunities for mission-based organisations based on a global survey of practitioners , 2020, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[40]  M. Hoagland,et al.  The Way Life Works , 1995 .

[41]  Torben Anker Lenau Biomimetics as a Design Methodology - Possibilities and Challenges , 2009 .

[42]  Altshuller Creativity As an Exact Science , 1984 .

[43]  L. H. Shu,et al.  Abstraction of Biological Analogies for Design , 2004 .

[44]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[45]  Robert L. Nagel,et al.  EXPLORING THE USE OF FUNCTIONAL MODELS AS A FOUNDATION FOR BIOMIMETIC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN , 2007 .

[46]  Denis Cavallucci,et al.  Development of an Ontology of Biomimetics Based on Altshuller's Matrix , 2018, TFC.

[47]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of Novelty-SAPPhIRE Relationship , 2009 .

[48]  Améziane Aoussat,et al.  Biomimetics, where are the biologists? , 2019, Journal of Engineering Design.

[49]  Nicklas Svendsen,et al.  How Does Biologically Inspired Design Cope With Multi-Functionality , 2019 .

[50]  Daniel A. McAdams,et al.  Biologically Meaningful Keywords for Functional Terms of the Functional Basis , 2011 .

[51]  J. Nebelsick,et al.  Towards a theoretical clarification of biomimetics using conceptual tools from engineering design , 2017, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[52]  G. Altshuller Creativity as an exact science : the theory of the solution of inventive problems , 1984 .

[53]  Akhlesh Lakhtakia,et al.  Biologically inspired design for environment , 2020 .

[54]  J. Vincent,et al.  Biomimetics: its practice and theory , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[55]  L. H. Shu,et al.  Supporting Biomimetic Design by Embedding Metadata in Natural-Language Corpora , 2010 .

[56]  Robert L. Nagel,et al.  Function-based, biologically inspired concept generation , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[57]  Julian F.V. Vincent,et al.  TRIZ as a Primary Tool for Biomimetics , 2016 .

[58]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  DRM, a Design Research Methodology , 2009 .

[59]  Améziane Aoussat,et al.  Distinct and Combined Effects of Disciplinary Composition and Methodological Support on Problem Solving in Groups , 2018 .

[60]  Jean Piaget,et al.  Studies in Reflecting Abstraction , 2001 .

[61]  N. Maranzana,et al.  MODELING BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS TO FACILITATE THEIR SELECTION DURING A BIO-INSPIRED DESIGN PROCESS , 2015 .

[62]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Seeking bioinspiration online: A descriptive account , 2013 .