Dynamic Optimal Control of Transboundary Pollution Abatement under Learning-by-Doing Depreciation

This paper analyzes a dynamic Stackelberg differential game model of watershed transboundary water pollution abatement and discusses the optimal decision-making problem under non-cooperative and cooperative differential game, in which the accumulation effect and depreciation effect of learning-by-doing pollution abatement investment are taken into account. We use dynamic optimization theory to solve the equilibrium solution of models. Through numerical simulation analysis, the path simulation and analysis of the optimal trajectory curves of each variable under finite-planning horizon and long-term steady state were carried out. Under the finite-planning horizon, the longer the planning period is, the lower the optimal emission rate is in equilibrium. The long-term steady-state game under cooperative decision can effectively reduce the amount of pollution emission. The investment intensity of pollution abatement in the implementation of non-cooperative game is higher than that of cooperative game. Under the long-term steady state, the pollution abatement investment trajectory of the cooperative game is relatively stable and there is no obvious crowding out effect. Investment continues to rise, and the optimal equilibrium level at steady state is higher than that under non-cooperative decision making. The level of decline in pollution stock under finite-planning horizon is not significant. Under the condition of long-term steady state, the trajectories of upstream and downstream pollution in the non-cooperative model and cooperative model are similar, but cooperative decision-making model is superior to the non-cooperative model in terms of the period of stabilization and steady state.

[1]  Alain Haurie,et al.  A two-level dynamic game of carbon emission trading between Russia, China, and Annex B countries , 2008 .

[2]  Konstantin Kogan,et al.  Learning by doing with spillovers: Strategic complementarity versus strategic substitutability , 2016, Autom..

[3]  Zheng Wang,et al.  Modeling and Computation of Transboundary Industrial Pollution with Emission Permits Trading by Stochastic Differential Game , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  Norio Okada,et al.  Load control regulation of water pollution: an analysis using game theory , 1988 .

[5]  Xiaojun Pan,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Dynamic optimal control of process – product innovation with learning by doing , 2015 .

[6]  David W. K. Yeung,et al.  Dynamically Consistent Cooperative Solution in a Differential Game of Transboundary Industrial Pollution , 2007 .

[7]  D. Jorgenson The Economic Theory of Replacement and Depreciation , 1974 .

[8]  M. Breton,et al.  Equilibrium Investment Strategies in Foreign Environmental Projects , 2006 .

[9]  S. B. Youssef,et al.  Transboundary Pollution, R&D Spillovers and International Trade , 2003 .

[10]  Z. Griliches R&D and Productivity: The Unfinished Business , 1998 .

[11]  L. Fernandez Trade's Dynamic Solutions to Transboundary Pollution☆ , 2002 .

[12]  A. Clarke Learning-by-doing and aggregate fluctuations: Does the form of the accumulation technology matter? , 2006 .

[13]  Hassan Benchekroun,et al.  Transboundary pollution and clean technologies , 2014 .

[14]  Shoude Li,et al.  A dynamic analysis of investment in process and product innovation with learning-by-doing , 2016 .

[15]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[16]  Shoude Li,et al.  A dynamic general equilibrium model of pollution abatement under learning by doing , 2014 .

[17]  J. List,et al.  Optimal Institutional Arrangements for Transboundary Pollutants in a Second-Best World: Evidence from a Differential Game with Asymmetric Players , 2000 .

[18]  Ilhyung Kim,et al.  Depreciation and transfer of knowledge: an empirical exploration of a shipbuilding process , 2009 .

[19]  Shuhua Chang,et al.  Dynamic optimal strategies in transboundary pollution game under learning by doing , 2018 .

[20]  Yongxi Yi,et al.  Cournot competition and “green” innovation under efficiency-improving learning by doing , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[21]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises , 1995 .

[22]  Georges Zaccour,et al.  A differential game of joint implementation of environmental projects , 2004, Autom..

[23]  Georges Zaccour,et al.  Strategic price subsidies for new technologies , 2013, Autom..

[24]  Shoude Li,et al.  A Differential Game of Transboundary Industrial Pollution with Emission Permits Trading , 2014, J. Optim. Theory Appl..

[25]  Linda Argote,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Microstructure of Knowledge Acquisition and Transfer Through Learning by Doing , 1996, Oper. Res..

[26]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .

[27]  Yann Bramoullé,et al.  Allocation of pollution abatement under learning by doing , 2005 .

[28]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Choice of environmental policy in the presence of learning by doing , 2006 .

[29]  Leon A. Petrosyan,et al.  A cooperative stochastic differential game of transboundary industrial pollution , 2008, Autom..

[30]  C. L. Benkard Learning and Forgetting: the Dynamics of Aircraft Production , 1999 .

[31]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Optimal Abatement and Emission Permit Trading Policies in a Dynamic Transboundary Pollution Game , 2018, Dyn. Games Appl..

[32]  Noah D. Hall TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION: HARMONIZING INTERNATIONAL AND DOMESTIC LAW , 2006 .

[33]  Åsa Löfgren,et al.  The effect of uncertainty on pollution abatement investments: Measuring hurdle rates for Swedish industry , 2008 .

[34]  Genyuan Zhong,et al.  Product and process innovation with knowledge accumulation in monopoly: A dynamic analysis , 2018 .

[35]  Olli Tahvonen,et al.  Carbon dioxide abatement as a differential game , 1994 .

[36]  Asymmetric information, signaling and environmental taxes in oligopoly , 2009 .

[37]  Frans Berkhout Book review "Technological change and the environment, resources for the future" , 2005 .

[38]  Martina Stimming Capital accumulation subject to pollution control:Open‐loop versus feedback investment strategies , 1999, Ann. Oper. Res..

[39]  Ke Xu,et al.  Dynamic pricing and channel efficiency in the presence of the cost learning effect , 2011, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..