Microlevel Structuration in Computer-Supported Group Decision Making

The theory of Structuration focuses on how actions by members of social collectives create the structures that enable and constrain future action. Most previous research on Structuration in groups and organizations used qualitative case studies because Structuration is quite complex. This study introduces a method for the study of Structuration in larger samples of groups or organizations. A category system for the identification of structuring moves is described, along with several methods for characterizing short- and long-term trends in Structuration processes. The method is used to study how groups incorporate a computerized group decision support system (GDSS) into their decision processes. GDSSs are part of a class of new computer and communication technologies designed to help groups improve their meetings and make better decisions. Because GDSSs must be used by a group rather than an individual, social processes are critical in determining their effects on group outcomes. GDSSs influence groups by structuring their activities, and structurational processes are critical mediators of the impacts of GDSSs on group decision making. The study focused on the effects of restrictiveness of GDSS technology on Structuration processes and, in turn, on the relation of Structuration to a key group outcome, consensus change. The results suggest that two major types of structuring processes occur in computer-supported groups and that the nature of structuration is related to degree of consensus change.

[1]  M. Joseph,et al.  Rhetoric in Shakespeare's Time , 1962 .

[2]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[3]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[4]  Jay Hall,et al.  The Effects of a Normative Intervention on Group Decision-Making Performance , 1970 .

[5]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[6]  Stephen W. Littlejohn Theories of Human Communication , 1978 .

[7]  A. Giddens Central Problems In Social Theory , 1979 .

[8]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer , 1979 .

[9]  David W. Wright,et al.  Small group communication research of the 1970's: A synthesis and critique , 1980 .

[10]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  A Fuzzy Analysis of Consensus in Small Groups , 1980 .

[11]  A. Grimshaw Comprehensive discourse analysis: An instance of professional peer interaction , 1982, Language in Society.

[12]  Patricia Riley,et al.  A Structurationist Account of Political Culture , 1983 .

[13]  John Shotter,et al.  “Duality of Structure” and “Intentionality” in an Ecological Psychology , 1983 .

[14]  A. Giddens The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[15]  R. Rice,et al.  The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology. , 1984 .

[16]  Robert D. McPhee,et al.  Group decision‐making as a structurational process , 1985 .

[17]  L. Crocker,et al.  Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory , 1986 .

[18]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[19]  R. Watson A study of group decision support system use in three and four-person groups for a preference alloca , 1987 .

[20]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[21]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making , 1988, CSUR.

[22]  Robert Johansen,et al.  Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams , 1988 .

[23]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[24]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Comprehensiveness and restrictiveness in group decision heuristics: effects of computer support on consensus decision making , 1989, ICIS '89.

[25]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Decision Development in Small Groups IV A Typology of Group Decision Paths , 1989 .

[26]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .

[27]  S. Barley Images of Imaging: Notes on Doing Longitudinal Field Work , 1990 .

[28]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Do we have any theories of group communication , 1990 .

[29]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Methods for Studying Innovation Development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program , 1990 .

[30]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using computing to facilitate the quality improvemetn process: The IRS-Minnesota project , 1991 .

[31]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the differences in collaborative system use through appropriation analysis , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[32]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[33]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting in a computer supported meeting environment , 1991 .

[34]  Brad M. Jackson,et al.  Interpretive analysis of team use of group technologies , 1993 .