Microscale frictional response of bovine articular cartilage from atomic force microscopy.

The objective of this study was to compare micro- and macroscale friction coefficients of bovine articular cartilage. Microscale measurements were performed using standard atomic force microscopy (AFM) techniques, using a 5 microm spherical probe tip. Twenty-four cylindrical osteochondral plugs were harvested in pairs from adjacent positions in six fresh bovine humeral heads (4-6 months old), and divided into two groups for AFM and macroscopic friction measurements. AFM measurements of friction were observed to be time-independent, whereas macroscale measurements demonstrated the well-documented time-dependent increase from a minimum to an equilibrium value. The microscale AFM friction coefficient (mu(AFM), 0.152+/-0.079) and macroscale equilibrium friction coefficient (mu(eq), 0.138+/-0.036) exhibited no statistical differences (p=0.50), while the macroscale minimum friction coefficient (mu(min), 0.004+/-0.001) was significantly smaller than mu(eq) and mu(AFM) (p<0.0001). Variations in articular surface roughness (Rq= 462+/-216 nm) did not correlate significantly with mu(AFM), mu(eq) or mu(min). The effective compressive modulus determined from AFM indentation tests using a Hertz contact analysis was E*=45.8+/-18.8 kPa. The main finding of this study is that mu(AFM) is more representative of the macroscale equilibrium friction coefficient, which represents the frictional response in the absence of cartilage interstitial fluid pressurization. These results suggest that AFM measurements may be highly suited for exploring the role of boundary lubricants in diarthrodial joint lubrication independently of the confounding effect of fluid pressurization to provide greater insight into articular cartilage lubrication.

[1]  W M Lai,et al.  An analysis of the unconfined compression of articular cartilage. , 1984, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  N. Suh,et al.  The genesis of friction , 1981 .

[3]  W F Heinz,et al.  Relative microelastic mapping of living cells by atomic force microscopy. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[4]  V. Mow,et al.  Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  W. Kraus,et al.  Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  G. Marshall,et al.  The functional width of the dentino-enamel junction determined by AFM-based nanoscratching. , 2001, Journal of structural biology.

[7]  Albert C. Chen,et al.  Depth‐dependent confined compression modulus of full‐thickness bovine articular cartilage , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  W F Heinz,et al.  Spatially resolved force spectroscopy of biological surfaces using the atomic force microscope. , 1999, Trends in biotechnology.

[9]  B A Hills,et al.  Boundary lubrication in vivo , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[10]  G. Truskey,et al.  Atomic force and total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy for the study of force transmission in endothelial cells. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[11]  J Fisher,et al.  The influence of continuous sliding and subsequent surface wear on the friction of articular cartilage , 1999, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[12]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Micro/nanotribology using atomic force microscopy/friction force microscopy: State of the art , 1998 .

[13]  F. Silver,et al.  The molecular structure and lubricating activity of lubricin isolated from bovine and human synovial fluids. , 1985, The Biochemical journal.

[14]  J Fisher,et al.  The Influence of Loading Time and Lubricant on the Friction of Articular Cartilage , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[15]  B. Schumacher,et al.  Immunodetection and partial cDNA sequence of the proteoglycan, superficial zone protein, synthesized by cells lining synovial joints , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  G A Ateshian,et al.  Experimental verification and theoretical prediction of cartilage interstitial fluid pressurization at an impermeable contact interface in confined compression. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  R. McMullen,et al.  Investigation of human hair fibers using lateral force microscopy. , 2001, Scanning.

[18]  Wilson C. Hayes,et al.  Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics , 1995 .

[19]  G A Ateshian,et al.  A Conewise Linear Elasticity mixture model for the analysis of tension-compression nonlinearity in articular cartilage. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[20]  Rupal V Patel,et al.  Regional structural and viscoelastic properties of fibrocartilage upon dynamic nanoindentation of the articular condyle. , 2001, Journal of structural biology.

[21]  N. Amer,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of lateral and normal forces with an optical‐beam‐deflection atomic force microscope , 1990 .

[22]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Atomic-Scale Friction Measurements Using Friction Force Microscopy. Part 1. General Principles and New Measurement Techniques , 1994 .

[23]  Walter Herzog,et al.  An improved solution for the contact of two biphasic cartilage layers , 1997 .

[24]  A. Engel,et al.  Surface and subsurface morphology of bovine humeral articular cartilage as assessed by atomic force and transmission electron microscopy. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[25]  Bhanu P. Jena,et al.  Atomic force microscopy in cell biology , 2002 .

[26]  Manfred Radmacher,et al.  Measuring the elastic properties of living cells by the atomic force microscope. , 2002, Methods in cell biology.

[27]  J. Gong,et al.  Friction of gels , 1997 .

[28]  Tianbai He,et al.  Direct measurement of plowing friction and wear of a polymer thin film using the atomic force microscope , 2001 .

[29]  G. Ateshian,et al.  An automated approach for direct measurement of two-dimensional strain distributions within articular cartilage under unconfined compression. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[30]  Ferenc Horkay,et al.  Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[31]  G. Jay,et al.  Homology of lubricin and superficial zone protein (SZP): Products of megakaryocyte stimulating factor (MSF) gene expression by human synovial fibroblasts and articular chondrocytes localized to chromosome 1q25 , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[32]  Seonghun Park,et al.  Cartilage interstitial fluid load support in unconfined compression. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  K. Costa,et al.  Analysis of indentation: implications for measuring mechanical properties with atomic force microscopy. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[34]  Gerard A. Ateshian,et al.  The Role of Interstitial Fluid Pressurization and Surface Porosities on the Boundary Friction of Articular Cartilage , 1998 .

[35]  Rupal V Patel,et al.  Microstructural and elastic properties of the extracellular matrices of the superficial zone of neonatal articular cartilage by atomic force microscopy. , 2003, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[36]  Gerard A. Ateshian,et al.  Interstitial Fluid Pressurization During Confined Compression Cyclical Loading of Articular Cartilage , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  F. Tiberg,et al.  Normal and lateral forces between lipid covered solids in solution: correlation with layer packing and structure. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[38]  K. Kuettner,et al.  Articular cartilage superficial zone protein (SZP) is homologous to megakaryocyte stimulating factor precursor and Is a multifunctional proteoglycan with potential growth-promoting, cytoprotective, and lubricating properties in cartilage metabolism. , 1999, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[39]  Gerard A. Ateshian,et al.  Contact Creep of Biphasic Cartilage Layers , 1999 .

[40]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Comparison of surface roughness measurements by stylus profiler, AFM and non-contact optical profiler , 1995 .

[41]  C. McCutchen.  The frictional properties of animal joints , 1962 .

[42]  G. Somorjai,et al.  Friction studies of hydrogel contact lenses using AFM: non-crosslinked polymers of low friction at the surface. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[43]  G A Ateshian,et al.  A theoretical formulation for boundary friction in articular cartilage. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[44]  T. Nakamura,et al.  Role of uppermost superficial surface layer of articular cartilage in the lubrication mechanism of joints , 2001, Journal of anatomy.

[45]  J. Gong,et al.  Friction of Gels. 3. Friction on Solid Surfaces , 1999 .

[46]  G A Ateshian,et al.  A theoretical solution for the frictionless rolling contact of cylindrical biphasic articular cartilage layers. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[47]  D. E. Kramer,et al.  Plastic strain and strain gradients at very small indentation depths , 2001 .

[48]  G. Somorjai,et al.  AFM and SFG studies of pHEMA-based hydrogel contact lens surfaces in saline solution: adhesion, friction, and the presence of non-crosslinked polymer chains at the surface. , 2002, Biomaterials.