Recent Trends in Imaging for Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: What Is the Best Approach?

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to ascertain recent trends in noninvasive imaging utilization for suspected coronary artery disease. METHODS The Medicare Part B databases for 2001 to 2013 were reviewed. Current Procedural Terminology primary codes for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), stress echocardiography (SE), and coronary CT angiography (CCTA) were selected. Physician specialty codes were used to designate providers as radiologists, cardiologists, and all others as a group. Procedure volumes were tabulated, and utilization rates per 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries were calculated over the period of study. RESULTS Total MPI utilization rates per 1,000 rose rapidly from 63.4 in 2001 to a peak of 88.0 in 2006 but declined every year thereafter, dropping to 61.9 in 2013. SE rates generally held steady around 12 to 13 from 2001 to 2010 but then began to decline, reaching 10.8 in 2013. Cardiologists predominate in both MPI and SE. CCTA rates were far lower. They peaked at 2.1 in 2007, but then dropped before leveling off at 1.07 in both 2012 and 2013. Radiologists and cardiologists have approximately equal roles in this procedure. CONCLUSIONS Both MPI and SE seem to be declining in use in recent years. This is likely due to unfavorable reimbursement trends caused by code bundling and resulting in the closure of many private cardiology offices. CCTA use is far lower than the two other types of imaging and has also declined in recent years. This is puzzling, as it is a new and promising procedure that has some advantages over MPI and SE. In 2013, 58 times as many MPI studies as CCTA studies were performed.

[1]  Joel Stein,et al.  Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2014, Circulation.

[2]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Dudley J Pennell,et al.  Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  R. Berg,et al.  A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2010 .

[7]  J. Messenger,et al.  Hospital variability in the rate of finding obstructive coronary artery disease at elective, diagnostic coronary angiography. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  R. Morin,et al.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. , 2010, Circulation.

[9]  Vasken Dilsizian,et al.  Journey in evolution of nuclear cardiology: will there be another quantum leap with the F-18-labeled myocardial perfusion tracers? , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[10]  Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Noninvasive Testing for Coronary Artery Disease , 2011 .

[11]  A. Jemal,et al.  Temporal Trends in Mortality in the United States, 1969-2013. , 2015, JAMA.

[12]  Sharmila Dorbala,et al.  Myocardial perfusion imaging and multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography: appropriate for all patients with suspected coronary artery disease? , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  Alan S. Go,et al.  Population trends in the incidence and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  J. Min,et al.  Finding the Gatekeeper to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Coronary CT Angiography or Stress Testing? , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Tessa S Cook,et al.  Cardiac CT angiography in the emergency department. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  E. Braunwald,et al.  A tale of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  D. Berman,et al.  Expert Consensus Document Expert Consensus Document ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography , 2010 .

[18]  Daniel S. Berman,et al.  Mortality risk in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a prospective 2-center study of 2,583 patients undergoing 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  D. Spevack,et al.  Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computerized tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  D. Levin,et al.  Recent payment and utilization trends in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging: comparison between self-referral and referral to radiologists. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[21]  J. Tu,et al.  Predictors of normal coronary arteries at coronary angiography. , 2013, American heart journal.

[22]  E. Halpern,et al.  Triple-rule-out CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. , 2009, Radiology.

[23]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2014, Circulation.

[24]  T. Villines,et al.  Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  K. Chinnaiyan,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography after stress testing: results from a multicenter, statewide registry, ACIC (Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium). , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  P. Austin,et al.  Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease among patients undergoing elective coronary catheterization in New York State and Ontario. , 2013, JAMA.

[27]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  E. Halpern,et al.  The lack of growth in use of coronary CT angiography: is it being appropriately used? , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  Nir Harish,et al.  The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) Trial , 2011 .

[30]  Masataka Nakano,et al.  Acute Coronary Events , 2012, Circulation.

[31]  J. Fleg,et al.  Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.