BEST PAPER: A Knowledge Task-Based Framework for Design and Evaluation of Information Visualizations

The design and evaluation of most current information visualization systems descend from an emphasis on a user's ability to "unpack" the representations of data of interest and operate on them independently. Too often, successful decision-making and analysis are more a matter of serendipity and user experience than of intentional design and specific support for such tasks; although humans have considerable abilities in analyzing relationships from data, the utility of visualizations remains relatively variable across users, data sets, and domains. In this paper, we discuss the notion of analytic gaps, which represent obstacles faced by visualizations in facilitating higher-level analytic tasks, such as decision-making and learning. We discuss support for bridging the analytic gap, propose a framework for design and evaluation of information visualization systems, and demonstrate its use

[1]  Robert Spence,et al.  The Attribute Explorer: information synthesis via exploration , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[2]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  An empirical comparison of three commercial information visualization systems , 2001, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2001. INFOVIS 2001..

[3]  Frank van Ham,et al.  Using multilevel call matrices in large software projects , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2003 (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8714).

[4]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Visual task characterization for automated visual discourse synthesis , 1998, CHI.

[5]  Ellen Yi-Luen Do,et al.  Developing architectural lighting representations , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2003 (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8714).

[6]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[7]  James J. Thomas,et al.  Visualizing the non-visual: spatial analysis and interaction with information from text documents , 1995, Proceedings of Visualization 1995 Conference.

[8]  Philip H. Marsden,et al.  Allocation of functions , 2004 .

[9]  P. Senge THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[10]  P. Fayers,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1990 .

[11]  Rachael Brady,et al.  BARD: a visualization tool for biological sequence analysis , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2003 (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8714).

[12]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces , 1990, CHI '90.

[13]  Freed Dh Is management still a science , 1992 .

[14]  Wesley M. Johnston,et al.  Model visualization , 2001 .

[15]  Ben Shneiderman Inventing discovery tools: combining information visualization with data mining? , 2002, Inf. Vis..

[16]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[17]  Stephen M. Casner,et al.  Task-analytic approach to the automated design of graphic presentations , 1991, TOGS.

[18]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  A problem-oriented classification of visualization techniques , 1990, Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Visualization: Visualization `90.

[19]  Jacques Bertin,et al.  Graphics and graphic information-processing , 1981 .

[20]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Solving the Multiple Instance Problem with Axis-Parallel Rectangles , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[21]  Stephen G. Eick,et al.  Visual Discovery and Analysis , 2000, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..