Distributed Consensus of Multiple Euler–Lagrange Systems Networked by Sampled-Data Information With Transmission Delays and Data Packet Dropouts

In this paper, the distributed consensus problem for a class of multiple Euler–Lagrange systems is solved. The considered issues are: 1) sampled-data information; 2) transmission delay; and 3) data packet dropouts. The considered mathematical models can describe a large number of practical systems in the actual engineering. In particular, all of the information exchanges are modeled by a sample-and-hold mechanism, which is more reliable and practical in applications. Moreover, this framework can deal with time-varying transmission delays and data packet dropouts by taking into account the limited communication capacity of information exchanges. By utilizing model transformation and applying the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional method, sufficient conditions are first established with single-packet information exchanges to ensure that the networked Euler-Lagrange systems can achieve consensus under undirected communication topology. Then, the obtained results are further extended to the multiple-packet transmission case. Finally, an example of four two-link manipulators with time-varying transmission delays and data packet dropouts is addressed to verify the effectiveness and applicability of our theoretical results.Note to Practitioners—The motivation of this paper is to investigate a practical networking strategy for the cooperative control of multiple Euler–Lagrange systems that have been widely applied in modeling robotic manipulators, autonomous underwater vehicles, and spacecrafts. Existing approaches are mainly based on the continuous-time communication network, which are difficult to be implemented in the real-world applications. In addition, energy consumption problems for multi-agent systems have received increasing attention in recent years, which also motivate us to carry out the present study. Since continuous-time communications inevitably consume much energy, how to find an effective way to reduce energy cost is an urgent task. Therefore, this paper presents a novel method for communications among multiple Euler–Lagrange systems based on the sampled-data information, where discrete-time communications are used instead of continuous-time communications. Another advantage of the proposed method is that it can significantly reduce the transmission energy consumption. Furthermore, both transmission delays and data packet dropouts are taken into account which make our results more applicable in practice.

[1]  Petter Ögren,et al.  Cooperative control of mobile sensor networks:Adaptive gradient climbing in a distributed environment , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[2]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Multi-AUV Control. and Adaptive Sampling in , 2004 .

[3]  Emilia Fridman,et al.  Robust sampled-data stabilization of linear systems: an input delay approach , 2004, Autom..

[4]  John J. Leonard,et al.  Cooperative Localization for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[5]  Alexandre Seuret,et al.  Taking into account period variations and actuator saturation in sampled-data systems , 2012, Syst. Control. Lett..

[6]  Guanghong Yang,et al.  Jensen integral inequality approach to stability analysis of continuous-time systems with time-varying delay , 2008 .

[7]  Peng Shi,et al.  Sampled-data control of networked linear control systems , 2007, Autom..

[8]  E.M. Atkins,et al.  A survey of consensus problems in multi-agent coordination , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005..

[9]  Long Wang,et al.  Asynchronous Consensus in Continuous-Time Multi-Agent Systems With Switching Topology and Time-Varying Delays , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[10]  Reza Olfati-Saber,et al.  Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  Identification with stochastic sampling time jitter , 2008, Autom..

[13]  J.K. Hedrick,et al.  An overview of emerging results in cooperative UAV control , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[14]  Steven X. Ding,et al.  A Review on Basic Data-Driven Approaches for Industrial Process Monitoring , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  Min Wu,et al.  Improved stabilisation method for networked control systems , 2007 .

[16]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Stability of networked control systems , 2001 .

[17]  Ziyang Meng,et al.  Leaderless and Leader-Following Consensus With Communication and Input Delays Under a Directed Network Topology , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[18]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  A survey of multi-agent organizational paradigms , 2004, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[19]  Emilia Fridman,et al.  A refined input delay approach to sampled-data control , 2010, Autom..

[20]  R. Ortega,et al.  On passivity-based output feedback global stabilization of Euler-Lagrange systems , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[21]  R. Mehra,et al.  Robust Tracking Control Design for Spacecraft Under Control Input Saturation , 2004 .

[22]  Fernando de Oliveira Souza,et al.  Consensus of multi-agent systems with nonuniform non-differentiable time-varying delays , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).

[23]  R. Ortega Passivity-based control of Euler-Lagrange systems : mechanical, electrical and electromechanical applications , 1998 .

[24]  Kamesh Subbarao,et al.  Adaptive Output Feedback Control for Spacecraft Rendezvous and Docking Under Measurement Uncertainty , 2006 .

[25]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  DISTRIBUTED COOPERATIVE CONTROL OF MULTIPLE VEHICLE FORMATIONS USING STRUCTURAL POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS , 2002 .

[26]  E. Fridman,et al.  A direct frequency domain approach to stability of linear systems with time-varying delays , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Symposium on, Mediterrean Conference on Control and Automation Intelligent Control, 2005..

[27]  H. Nijmeijer,et al.  Bounded output feedback tracking control of fully actuated Euler-Lagrange systems , 1998 .

[28]  M. Akella Rigid body attitude tracking without angular velocity feedback , 2000 .

[29]  Giovanni Muscato,et al.  Kinematics, dynamics and control of a hybrid robot Wheeleg , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[30]  Jonghoon Park,et al.  Analytic nonlinear H∞ inverse-optimal control for Euler-Lagrange system , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..