Prenatal diagnosis and dysmorphic findings in mosaic trisomy 16

We report two cases of mosaic trisomy 16 diagnosed by amniocentesis, with dysmorphic findings in both cases evident upon delivery. Following elective termination, case 1 demonstrated a trisomy 16 cell line in fetal skin (4 per cent) and placental tissue (64 per cent). Molecular studies on the disomic cell line indicated that both chromosome 16s were maternal in origin, suggesting loss of the paternal chromosome 16 from a trisomic zygote (uniparental heterodisomy). At birth, case 2 demonstrated only disomic cells in skin and blood, with trisomy 16 present in 4 per cent of cells from the amnion. Molecular studies confirmed both maternal and paternal contributions of the chromosome 16s. We analysed DNA from one previously reported case of mosaic trisomy 16 (Williams et al., 1992) and failed to find signs of uniparental disomy in this child with congenital heart defects. These cases had distinctive but different dysmorphic features. We suggest that trisomy 16 embryos may revert to disomy during the course of pregnancy, allowing for longer survival with various abnormalities in growth and morphogenesis. The clinical significance of prenatally detected mosaic trisomy 16 may not be completely defined by additional cytogenetic, molecular, and ultrasound studies.

[1]  S. Langlois,et al.  Uniparental disomy for chromosome 16 in humans. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[2]  R. Erickson,et al.  Trisomy 15 with loss of the paternal 15 as a cause of Prader-Willi syndrome due to maternal disomy. , 1992, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  R. Richards,et al.  Isolation and characterisation of (AC)n microsatellite genetic markers from human chromosome 16. , 1992, Genomics.

[4]  T. Mohandas,et al.  Apparent non‐mosaic trisomy 16 in chorionic villi: Diagnostic dilemma or clinically significant finding? , 1992, Prenatal Diagnosis.

[5]  P. Ratcliffe,et al.  Rapid genetic analysis of families with polycystic kidney disease 1 by means of a microsatellite marker , 1991, The Lancet.

[6]  M. Pembrey,et al.  Uniparental paternal disomy in Angelman's syndrome , 1991, The Lancet.

[7]  T. Hassold,et al.  Molecular studies of non-disjunction in trisomy 16. , 1991, Journal of medical genetics.

[8]  D. Warburton,et al.  Chromosome anomalies and prenatal development : an atlas , 1991 .

[9]  I. Kovar,et al.  Mosaic trisomy 16 in a live newborn infant. , 1990, Archives of disease in childhood.

[10]  J. Knoll,et al.  Genetic imprinting suggested by maternal heterodisomy in non-deletion Prader-Willi syndrome , 1989, Nature.

[11]  L. Shulman,et al.  Resorbed co‐twin as an explanation for discrepant chorionic villus results: Non‐mosaic 47,XX, +16 in villi (direct and culture) with normal (46,XX) amniotic fluid and neonatal blood , 1989, Prenatal diagnosis.

[12]  R. Gardner,et al.  Trisomy 16 detected at chorion villus sampling , 1989, Prenatal diagnosis.

[13]  S. Latt,et al.  Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes share a common chromosome 15 deletion but differ in parental origin of the deletion. , 1989, American journal of medical genetics.

[14]  Y. Nakamura,et al.  Isolation and mapping of a polymorphic DNA sequence (pEKMDA2-I) on chromosome 16 [D16S83]. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  Purification of DNA from formaldehyde fixed and paraffin embedded human tissue. , 1985, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.